Abstract
In Canada, women are a minority in university mathematics programmes, and this situation has not improved in the past several years. To examine this situation, research was conducted to investigate the experiences of women who might be considered “success stories” in mathematics—those who persevered beyond their initial years of university study—to understand the supports and challenges that they faced. Elise, a master’s student in mathematics, participated in this study. Although by external standards Elise was a very successful student and perhaps even a “model” of a successful woman in this field, her interview provided evidence that she was very anxious and nervous, and felt extreme pressure to succeed and be “perfect”. By examining Elise’s experiences, a better understanding of the tension between Elise’s outward success and internal anxieties can be garnered. Additionally, a re-examination of traditional definitions of women’s success in fields dominated by men is provided. We also discuss considerations that should be taken into account when interacting with high-achieving students.
Résumé
Au Canada, les femmes sont en minorité dans les programmes de mathématiques à l’université, et la situation ne s’est guère améliorée dans les dernières années. Pour analyser cette situation, une recherche a été menée afin d’examiner l’expérience de femmes qu’on peut considérer comme des exemples de réussite en mathématiques – celles qui ont persévéré au-delà des premières années d’études universitaires – dans le but de mieux comprendre le soutien qu’elles ont reçu et les défis qu’elles ont relevés. Elise, étudiante à la maîtrise en mathématiques, a participé à cette étude. Même si, selon les critères standards, Elise était une excellente étudiante, voire un modèle de femme ayant réussi dans cette discipline, l’entrevue réalisée avec elle indique qu’elle était très anxieuse et nerveuse, et qu’elle sentait une forte pression l’obligeant à réussir et à être « parfaite ». En analysant l’expérience d’Elise, nous sommes en mesure de mieux comprendre la tension qui existe entre les signes extérieurs de la réussite et l’anxiété profonde. En outre, nous proposons une remise en question des définitions traditionnelles lorsqu’il s’agit de la réussite des femmes dans des disciplines dominées par les hommes. Nous nous penchons également sur certains facteurs dont il faudrait tenir compte lorsqu’on interagit avec des étudiants très performants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the Statistics Canada database, mathematics, computer science, and information science are aggregated.
Whilst we view gender as a spectrum, some of the authors and sources that we cite, particularly regarding statistics and large-scale datasets, treat gender as a binary, so we report their findings as such.
References
Alcock, L., Attridge, N., Kenny, S., & Inglis, M. (2014). Achievement and behaviour in undergraduate mathematics: Personality is a better predictor than gender. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.874094
Applebaum, P. M. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Becker, J. R., & Jacobs, J. E. (2001). Introduction. In J. E. Jacobs, J. R. Becker, & G. F. Gilmer (Eds.), Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives on gender (pp. 1–7). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Bench, S. W., Lench, H. C., Liew, J., Miner, K., & Flores, S. A. (2015). Gender gaps in overestimation of math performance. Sex Roles, 72(11–12), 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0486-9
Boaler, J., & Sengupta-Irving, T. (2006). Nature, neglect and nuance: Changing accounts of sex, gender and mathematics. In C. Skeleton, B. Francis, & L. Smulyan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of gender and education (pp. 207–220). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Burton, L. (1995). Moving towards a feminist epistemology of mathematics. In P. Rogers & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Equity in mathematics education: Influences of feminism and culture (pp. 209–225). London, England: Routledge Falmer.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1999). Subjects of sex/gender/desire. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 340–358). London, England: Routledge.
Cornell, D. G., Callahan, C. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1991a). Personality growth of female early college entrants: A controlled prospective study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500305
Cornell, D. G., Callahan, C. M., & Loyd, B. H. (1991b). Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500202
Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Creswell, J. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Sydney, Australia: Pearson.
Damarin, S. K. (2008). Toward thinking feminism and mathematics together. Signs, 34(1), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1086/588470
Donmoyer, R. (1990). Generalizability and the single case study. In E. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: The debate continues (pp. 175–199). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLOS One, 11(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157447
Ernest, P. (1998). Images of mathematics, values, and gender: A philosophical perspective. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social justice and mathematics education: Gender, class, ethnicity and the politics of schooling (pp. 45–58). Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
Fennema, E., & Hart, L. E. (1994). Gender and the JRME. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.2307/749577
de Freitas, E. (2008). Mathematics and its other: (Dis)locating the feminine. Gender and Education, 20(3), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250801964189
Gill, K. (2000). Young women’s decision to pursue non-traditional science: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and contextual influences (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Gross, M. U. M., & van Vliet, H. E. (2005). Radical acceleration and early entry to college: A review of the research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620504900205
Hall, J. (2012). Gender issues in mathematics: An Ontario perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 8(1), 59–72. Retrieved from https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/JTL
Hanna, G. (2003). Reaching gender equity in mathematics education. The Educational Forum, 67(3), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720309335034
Henrion, C. (1997). Women in mathematics: The addition of difference. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Herbert, J., & Stipek, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children’s perceptions of their academic competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.007
Herzig, A. H. (2002). Where have all the doctoral students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(2), 177–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021126424414
Herzig, A. H. (2004). Becoming mathematicians: Women and students of color choosing and leaving doctoral mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 171–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074002171
Herzig, A. H. (2010). Women belonging in the social worlds of graduate mathematics. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2 & 3), 177–208. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/the-mathematics-enthusiast
Hollander, J. A., Renfrow, D. G., & Howard, J. A. (2011). Gendered situations, gendered selves: A gender lens on social psychology (2nd ed.). Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Rowman and Littlefield.
Janos, P. M., Robinson, N. M., Carter, C., Chapel, A., Cufley, R., Curland, M.,... Wise, A. (1988). A cross-sectional developmental study of the social relations of students who enter college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200105
Jungwirth, H. (2003). What is a gender-sensitive mathematics classroom? In L. Burton (Ed.), Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 3–26). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Kleanthous, I., & Williams, J. (2013). Perceived parental influence and students’ dispositions to study mathematically-demanding courses in higher education. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2013.763608
Leder, G. (1992). Mathematics and gender: Changing perspectives. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 597–622). Reston, VA: NCTM.
Leder, G. (2011). Mathematics taught me Einstein’s old cocktail of inspiration and perspiration: Mathematically talented teenagers as adults. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2011.548897
Mendick, H. (2005). Mathematical stories: Why do more boys than girls choose to study mathematics at AS-level in England?. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142569042000294192
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
Mendick, H., Epstein, D., & Moreau, M.-P. (2007). Mathematical images and identities: Education, entertainment, social justice. Swindon, England: Economic and Social Research Council.
Mendick, H., Moreau, M.-P., & Hollingworth, S. (2008, July). “Who says you can’t do maths in stockings?”: An exploration of representations of women doing mathematics in popular culture. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Mathematics Education (ICME-11), Monterrey, Mexico.
Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2016). “I used to fall asleep in class… but physics is fascinating”: The use of large-scale longitudinal data to explore the educational experiences of aspiring girls in mathematics and physics. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(4), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1235743
Muratori, M., Colangelo, N., & Assouline, S. (2003). Early-entrance students: Impressions of their first semester of college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700306
Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: An unknown quantity? In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In A. M. Gallagher & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294-315). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2008). Images of mathematicians: A new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(4), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0126-8
Piatek-Jimenez, K. (2015). On the persistence and attrition of women in mathematics. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 5(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201501.03
Picker, S. H., & Berry, J. S. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017523230758
Picker, S. H., & Berry, J. S. (2001). Your students’ images of mathematicians and mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(4), 202–208. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/publications/toc.aspx?jrnl=mtms
Pryzgoda, J., & Chrisler, J. C. (2000). Definitions of gender and sex: The subtleties of meaning. Sex Roles, 43(7/8), 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007123617636
Rodd, M., & Bartholomew, H. (2006). Invisible and special: Young women’s experiences as undergraduate mathematics students. Gender and Education, 18(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250500195093
Rodd, M., Rice, M., & Mujtaba, T. (2014). Qualified, but not choosing STEM at university: Unconscious influences on choice of study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(4), 330–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2014.938838
Sheldrake, R., Mujtaba, T., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Students’ intentions to study non-compulsory mathematics: The importance of how good you think you are. British Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 462–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3150
Stage, F. K., & Maple, S. A. (1996). Incompatible goals: Narratives of graduate women in the mathematics pipeline. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033001023
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Statistics Canada. (2017a). Table 477-0029 – Postsecondary enrolments, by program type, credential type, Classification of Instructional Programs, Primary Grouping (CIP_PG), registration status and sex, annual (number), CANSIM (database). Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a47
Statistics Canada. (2017b). Table 477-0030 – Postsecondary graduates, by program type, credential type, Classification of Instructional Programs, Primary Grouping (CIP_PG) and sex, annual (number), CANSIM (database). Retrieved from http://www5.statcan.gc.ca/cansim/a47
Stepp, L. S. (2007). Introduction. In Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love and lose at both (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Sumpter, L. (2015). Why Sarah left academia. In H. Silfverberg, T. Lӓrki, & M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education: Proceedings of NORMA14 (pp. 371–380). Turku, Finland: University of Turku, Department of Teacher Education
Vale, C. (2008, July). Trends and factors concerning gender and mathematics in Australasia. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress on Mathematics Education (ICME-11), Monterrey, Mexico.
Weiner, S. E. (2008). The Impostor Phenomenon: An exploratory study of the socializing factors that contribute to feelings of fraudulence among high achieving, diverse female undergraduates (Unpublished master’s thesis). Smith College, Northampton, MA.
Wilson, T. (2009). Understanding media users: From theory to practice. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 215–246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312037001215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, J., Suurtamm, C. Behind the “Success Story”: Exploring the Experiences of a Woman Mathematics Major. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ. 18, 342–354 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0032-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0032-1