Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

To Teach or Not to Teach? Teacher-Researchers Cope With Learners’ Misconceptions in Interview Setting

  • Published:
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is concerned with tensions that teachers who are studying for a graduate degree in mathematics education experience when conducting a research project. Specifically, we focused on the tensions that emerge in situations where teacher-researchers encounter the mathematical misconceptions and difficulties of their interviewees. The analysis of participants’research reports and reflections revealed that these situations are loaded with tensions between their desire to help their interviewees with mathematics and to collect data for their projects. Based on the modified analytic induction, we explained participants’decision making with situated learning theory. Possible sources of participants’tensions are discussed in terms of their methodological knowledge.

Résumé

Cet article traite des tensions qu’éprouvent les enseignants qui poursuivent leurs études de deuxième ou troisième cycle en didactique des mathématiques lorsqu’ils dirigent un projet de recherche. En particulier, nous centrons notre attention sur les tensions qui émergent dans les situations où les enseignants-chercheurs sont aux prises avec les idées erronées et les difficultés de leurs répondants. Une analyse des rapports de recherche et des considérations révèle que ces situations sont chargées de tensions provenant du désir d’aider les participants en mathématiques et de celui de recueillir des données pour leur projet de recherche. Grâce à l’induction analytique modifiée, nous expliquons le processus de prise de décision des participants au moyen de la théorie de l’apprentissage en situation. Les sources possibles de tensions chez les participants sont analysée en termes de leurs connaissances méthodologiques et de la transposition des connaissances entre l’enseignement et les communautés de recherche pratique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arzarello, F., Robutti, O., Sabena, C., Cusi, A., Garuti, R., Malara, N., & Martignone, F. (2014). Meta-didactical transportation: A theoretical model for teacher education programmes. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era (pp. 277–295). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atay, D. (2008). Teacher research for professional development. ELT Journal, 62(2), 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., Ball, D. L., & Even, R. (2003). Preparing researchers for disciplined inquiry: Learning from, in, and for practice. In A. Bishop & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 491–521). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilbert, D., Lane, R., & Van Bergen, P. (2015). Understanding student engagement with research: A study of pre-service teachers’ research perceptions, research experience, and motivation. Asia–Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(2), 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handley, K., Clark, T., Fincham, R., & Sturdy, A. (2007). Researching situated learning participation, identity and practices in client–consultant relationships. Management Learning, 38(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T. (1988). Research paradigms in education. Interchange, 19, 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontorovich, I. (2015). Learning from the experts in mathematics education research. Far East Journal of Mathematics Education, 15, 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontorovich, I. (2016). Theoretical framework of researcher knowledge development in mathematics education. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malara, N. A., & Zan, R. (2002). The problematic relationship between theory and practice. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 553–580). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E. (2015). “Not like a big gap, something we could handle”: Facilitating shifts in paradigm in the supervision of mathematics graduates upon entry into mathematics education. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(1), 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassoli de Bianchi, M. S. (2013). The observer effect. Foundations of Science, 18, 213–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2008). Research methods in (mathematics) education. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 467–519). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubauer-Leoni, M. L., & Grossen, M. (1993). Negotiating the meaning of questions in didactic and experimental contracts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Hazzan, O. (1998). Interviewing in mathematics education research: Choosing the questions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor’ Kontorovich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kontorovich, I., Rouleau, A. To Teach or Not to Teach? Teacher-Researchers Cope With Learners’ Misconceptions in Interview Setting. Can J Sci Math Techn 18, 9–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0004-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0004-5

Navigation