Skip to main content
Log in

“I Gotta Touch that?” Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Pre-Service Teachers Regarding Scary or Disgusting Science

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focused on our teaching efforts in regard to preparing preservice teachers to one day teach children about ecological concepts that many find scary or disgusting. Specifically, we examined the attitudes these preservice teachers had towards certain invertebrates. These attitudes were compared to their self-efficacy towards teaching about them. A multiple case study design was used, involving both qualitative and quantitative data. Participants were categorized as having positive, neutral, or negative attitudes towards the invertebrates and activities. Self-efficacy for participants’ perceived ability to teach these concepts were categorized as high, medium, or low. Correlations were run to examine relationships between variables of attitudes and self-efficacy. Participants demonstrated more negative than positive reactions towards the invertebrates. Positive correlations between attitudes towards invertebrates and their self-efficacy towards teaching about them were found. This indicates that if we want future teachers to be comfortable teaching about the scary and disgusting aspects of an ecosystem, we need to find ways to help them improve their attitudes towards those aspects of the outdoors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albion, P. R., & Spence, K. G. (2013). Primary connections in a provincial Queensland school system: Relationships to science teaching self-efficacy and practices. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 8, 501–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1978). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. K. (2013). Science instructional time is declining in elementary schools: What are the implications for student achievement and closing the gap? Science Education, 97, 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgi, M., & Cirulli, F. (2015). Attitudes toward animals among kindergarten children: Species preferences. Anthrozoös, 28(1), 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botella, C., Pérez-Ara, M. Á., Bretón-López, J., Quero, S., García-Palacios, A., & Baños, R. M. (2016). In vivo versus augmented reality exposure in the treatment of small animal phobia: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 11(2), e0148237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broeren, S., Lester, K. J., Muris, P., & Field, A. P. (2011). They are afraid of the animal, so therefore I am too: Influence of peer modeling on fear beliefs and approach – Avoidance behaviors towards animals in typically developing children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, G. B., Schlegal, J., Kauf, P., & Rupf, R. (2015). The importance of being colorful and able to fly: Interpretation and implications of children’s statements on selected insects and other invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2664–2687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2016). An analysis of zoo visitors’ favourite and least favourite animals. Tourism Management Perspectives, 20, 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colléony, A., Clayton, S., Couvet, D., Saint Jalme, M., & Prévot, A. (2017). Human preferences for species conservation: Animal charisma trumps endangered status. Biological Conservation, 206, 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V., & Biran, A. (2001). Dirt, disgust, and disease: Is hygiene in our genes? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey, G. C. L. (2011). Disgust: The disease-avoidance emotion and its dysfunctions. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 366(1583), 3453–3465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draheim, M. M., Patterson, K. W., Rockwood, L. L., Guagnano, G. A., & Parsons, E. C. M. (2013). Attitudes of college undergraduates towards coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban landscape: Management and public outreach implications. Animals, 3, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drissner, J., Simonte, M., & Hille, K. (2016). Attitudes of school children in Germany and Costa Rica towards invertebrates –a comparison. Research Journal of Education, 2(3), 34–37.

  • Dunne, G., & Askew, C. (2013). Vicarious learning and unlearning of fear in childhood via mother and stranger models. Emotion, 13, 974–980.

  • Eidietis, L., Gray, S., Riggs, L., West, B., & Coffman, M. (2007). Goodbye critter jitters: Preservice teachers discover the benefits of using invertebrates to support inquiry. Science and Children, 45(1), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazzah, L., Bath, A., Dolrenry, S., Dickman, A., & Frank, L. (2017). From attitudes to actions: Predictors of lion killing by Maasai warriors. PLoS One, 12(1), e0170796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehl, S., & Pauen, S. (2017). Do infants associate spiders and snakes with fearful facial expressions? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IUCN. (2017). The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2017-3: Summary statistics. Retrieved from http://www.iucnredlist.org/about/summary-statistics#Tables_1_2

  • Johns, R. A. & Pontes, R. (2019). Parks, rhetoric and environmental education: Challenges and opportunities for enhancing ecoliteracy. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-0029-x

  • Kazempour, M. (2014). I can’t teach science! A case study of an elementary pre-service teacher’s intersection of science experiences, beliefs, attitude, and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1984). American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update. In M. W. Fox & L. D. Mickley (Eds.), Advances in animal welfare science 1984/85 (pp. 177–213). Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallan, K. M., Lipp, O. V., & Cochrane, B. (2013). Slithering snakes, angry men and out-group members: What and whom are we evolved to fear? Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1168–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, N., Bobilya, A. J., Faircloth, W. B., Mitten, D., & Chandler, R. M. (2018). The effect of an outdoor orientation program on participants’ biophilic expressions. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21, 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, A., & Esson, M. (2010). Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biology, 29, 715–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Bodden, D., Merckelback, H., Ollendick, T. H., & King, N. (2003). Fear of the beast: A prospective study on the effects of negative information on childhood fear. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., Mayer, B., Huijding, J., & Konings, T. (2008). A dirty animal is a scary animal! Effects of disgust-related information on fear beliefs in children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muris, P., van Zwol, L., Huijding, J., & Mayer, B. (2010). Mom told me scary things about this animal: Parents installing fear beliefs in their children via the verbal information pathway. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plous, S. (1993). Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 11–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Özel, M., & Uşak, M. (2009). Cross-culutral comparison of student attitudes toward snakes. Society and Animals, 17, 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokop, P., Tolarovičová, A., Camerik, A. M., & Peterková, V. (2010). High school students’ attitudes towards spiders: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Science Education, 32, 1665–1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randler, C., Hummel, E., & Prokop, P. (2012). Practical work at school reduces disgust and fear of unpopular animals. Society & Animals, 20, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonfelder, M. L., & Bogner, F. X. (2017). Individual perception of bees: Between perceived danger and willingness to protect. PLoS One, 12(6), e0180168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sia, A. P. (1992, October). Preservice elementary teachers’ perceived efficacy in teaching environmental education: a preliminary study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ECO-ED North American Association for Environmental Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • Silva, A., & Minor, E. S. (2017). Adolescents’ experience and knowledge of, and attitudes toward, bees: Implications and recommendations for conservation. Anthrozoös, 30(1), 19–32.

  • Sowder, M., & Harward, S. (2011). Time for science? A study on the use of instructional time for teaching science at the elementary level. Journal of the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts, & Letters, 88, 186–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theimer, S., & Ernst, J. (2012). Fostering “connectedness to nature” through U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service education and outreach programming: A qualitative evaluation. Applied Environmental Education& Communication, 11(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomažič, I., Pihler, N., & Strgar, J. (2017). Pre-service biology teachers’ reported fear and disgust of animals and their willingness to incorporate live animals into their teaching trhough study years. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 337–349.

  • Trauth-Nare, A. (2017). Influence of an intensive, field-based life science course on preservice teachers’ self-efficacy for environmental science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(5), 497–519.

  • Wagler, R. (2010). The association between preservice elementary teacher animal attitude and the likelihood of animal incorporation in future science curriculum. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(3), 353–375.

  • Wagler, R., & Wagler, A. (2011). Arthropods: Attitudes and incorporation in preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(3), 229–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagler, R., & Wagler, A. (2015). Assessing the attitudes and beliefs of preservice middle school science teachers toward biologically diverse animals. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10, 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth, A. W. (2012). An investigation into the determining factors of zoo visitor attendances in UK zoos. PLoS One, 7(1), e29839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Designs and methods (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nichole Nageotte.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was unfunded. It gained IRB approval. Participants provided consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nageotte, N., Buck, G. “I Gotta Touch that?” Attitudes and Self-Efficacy of Pre-Service Teachers Regarding Scary or Disgusting Science. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 23, 173–190 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00054-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-020-00054-7

Keywords

Navigation