Back to the Garten: Ontario kindergarteners learn and grow through schoolyard pedagogy

Original paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Grounded in the new sociology of childhood and thus valuing the perspectives of young children, this study examined how outdoor, inquiry-based schoolyard pedagogy is experienced by kindergarten students. The study explored two primary research questions: (1) what do students report about their experiences in an outdoor, inquiry-based classroom setting?; and (2) what do teachers report about their observations of children’s experiences in an outdoor, inquiry-based classroom setting? The study employed a phenomenographic methodology consisting of interviews and inductive analysis. Three major themes emerged: 1) student-led experiences in the outdoor classroom, 2) lessons experienced in the outdoor classroom, and 3) boundaries to learning in the outdoor classroom. Subthemes included learning through play, interpersonal learning, connecting with nature, inquiry-based curriculum, and resources. These themes provide insights regarding the structures of learning spaces, the roles of teachers, and the linkages between schoolyard pedagogy and emancipatory knowledge.

Keywords

New sociology of childhood Transdisciplinary outdoor/inquiry-based learning Kindergarten students Phenomenography 

References

  1. Akerlind, G. (2012). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(1), 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvestad, M. (2011). You can learn something every day! Children talk about learning in kindergarten: Traces of learning cultures. International Journal of Childhood, 43(3), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anfara, V. A., & Mertz, N. T. (2015). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Ashworth, P., & Lucas, U. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowden, J. (2005). Reflections on the phenomenographic research process. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 11–31). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Breunig, M. (2008). The historical roots of experiential education theory and practice. In K. Warren, T. A. Loeffler, & D. Mitten (Eds.), Theory and practice of experiential education (5th ed., pp. 77–92). Boulder: Association for Experiential Education.Google Scholar
  8. Breunig, M. (2013). Environmental sustainability and environmental justice: From buzzwords to emancipatory pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Sustainability Education, 5, 232–248.Google Scholar
  9. Breunig, M. (2014). The impact of integrated environmental studies programs: are students motivated to act pro-environmentally? Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breunig, M. (2017). Experientially teaching and learning in a student-directed classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 40(3), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchanan, S., Harlan, M. A., Bruce, C., & Edwards, S. (2016). Inquiry-based learning models, information literacy, and student engagement: A literature review. School Libraries Worldwide, 22(2), 23–40.Google Scholar
  12. Chawla, L. (2009). Growing up green: Becoming an agent of care for the natural world. The Journal of Developmental Processes, 4(1), 6–23.Google Scholar
  13. Childs, E. A. (2011). Impact of school gardens on student attitudes and beliefs. (Graduate Theses and Dissertations, Iowa State University), Digital Repository.Google Scholar
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2002). Revisiting garden based learning in basic education: Philosophical roots, historical foundations, best practices and products, impacts, outcomes, and future directions. Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations; International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. In M. L. Borrowman (Ed.), Teacher education in America: A documentary history (pp. 140–171). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: H. Holt & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dillon, J., & Dickie, I. (2012). Learning in the natural environment: Review of social and economic benefits and barriers. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number 092.Google Scholar
  21. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., & Teamey, K. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: Eevidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87(320), 107–112.Google Scholar
  22. Duncan-Andrade, J., & Morrell, E. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools, 285. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Dyment, J. (2005). Green school grounds as sites for outdoor learning: Barriers and opportunities. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(1), 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 14(1), 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feille, K. (2013). Getting outside: three teachers’ stories of using the schoolyard as an integrated tool for elementary teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Fenwick, T. (2001). Experiential learning: A theoretical critique from five perspectives. Information Series No. 385. ERIC Clearing house on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. Google Scholar
  27. Fielding, M. (2012). Beyond student voice: Patterns of partnership and the demands of deep democracy. Revista de Educación, 359, 45–65.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher-Maltese, C., & Zimmerman, T. D. (2015). A garden-based approach to teaching life science produces shifts in students’ attitudes toward the environment. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(1), 51–66.Google Scholar
  29. Galt, R., Parr, D., Kim, J., Beckett, J., Lickter, M., & Ballard, H. (2013). Transformative food systems education in a land-grant college of agriculture: the importance of learner-centered inquiries. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(1), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghent, C., Trauth-Nare, A., Dell, K., & Haines, S. (2014). The influence of a statewide green school initiative on student achievement in K–12 classrooms. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 13(4), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gill, T. (2011). Children and nature: A quasi-systematic review of the empirical evidence. Sustainable Development Commission: London.Google Scholar
  32. Gordon, M. (2009). Toward a pragmatic discourse of constructivism: Reflections on lessons from practice. Educational Studies, 45(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Greene & Hogan. (2005). Researching Children's Experience : Approaches and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris, F. (2015). The nature of learning at forest school: practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 3–13.Google Scholar
  35. Hickey-Moody, A. (2016). Youth agency and adult influence: A critical revision of little publics. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 38(1), 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hugh, G. (1994). Niagara's changing landscapes. Carlton University Press. Google Scholar
  37. Itin, C. (1999). Reasserting the philosophy of experiential education as a vehicle for change in the 21st century. The Journal of Experimental Education, 22(2), 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacobi-Vessels, J. L. (2013). Discovering nature: The benefits of teaching outside of the classroom. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 41(3), 1–7.Google Scholar
  39. Kalvaitis, D., & Monhardt, R. (2012). The architecture of children’s relationships with nature: A phenomenographic investigation seen through drawings and written narratives of elementary students. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kellert, S. (2002). Reflections on Children’s Experience of Nature. Children & Nature Network Leadership Writing Series, 1(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  41. Kiewra, C., Reeble, T., & Rosenow, N. (2011). Growing with nature: Supporting whole-child learning in outdoor classrooms. Lincoln: Dimensions in Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  42. Kirk, D. (2007). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: a literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(7), 1250–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knapp, C. (1992). Lasting lessons: A teacher's guide to reflecting on experience. Charleston: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.Google Scholar
  44. Leavy, P. (2011). Essentials of transdisciplinary research: Using problem-centered methodologies. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lloyd, A., & Gray, T. (2014). Place-based outdoor learning and environmental sustainability within Australian Primary School. Journal of Sustainability Education, vol. September 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mason, J., & Hood, S. (2010). Exploring issues of children as actors in social research. Children and Youth Services Review, 43(4), 490–495.Google Scholar
  48. Matthews. (2007). A window on the ‘new’ sociology of childhood. Social Compass, 1(1), 322–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maynard, T., Waters, J., & Clement, J. (2013). Moving outdoors: further explorations of “child-initiated” learning in the outdoor environment. Education 3-13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education 41(3), 282–289.Google Scholar
  50. McLean, G. N. (2011). Writing theory, conceptual, and position articles for publication. In T. S. Rocco & T. Hatcher (Eds.), The Handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 209–221). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  51. Meynert, M. (2014). Conceptualizations of childhood, pedagogy and educational research in the postmodern - A critical interpretation. Department of Sociology: Lund University.Google Scholar
  52. Michalopoulou, A. (2014). Inquiry-based learning through the creative thinking and expression in early years education. Creative Education, 5, 377–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, D. L., Tichota, K., & White, J. (2013). Young children's authentic play in a nature explore classroom supports goundational learning: A single case study. Lincoln: Dimensions Educational Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Moore, R., & Cosco, N. (2014). Growing up green and healthy: Naturalization as a health promotion strategy in early childhood outdoor learning environments. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 168–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nairn, A., & Clarke, B. (2012). Researching children: are we getting it right? A discussion of ethics. International Journal of Market Research, 54(2), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Novak, J. (2010). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Ontario Ministry of Education, (2013). Inquiry-based learning. Capacity Building Series 32.Google Scholar
  58. Ozer. (2006). The effects of school gardens on students and schools: Conceptualization and donsiderations for maximizing healthy development. Health Education and Behaviour, 34(6), 846–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Palaiologou, I. (2014). ‘Do we hear what children want to say?’ Ethical praxis when choosing research tools with children under five. Early Child Development and Care, 184, 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  61. Roberts, J. W. (2011). Beyond learning by doing: Theoretical currents in experiential education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Samarapungavan, A., Patrick, H., & Mantzicopoulos, P. (2011). What kindergarten students learn in inquiry-based science classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 416–470.Google Scholar
  63. Samborski, S. (2010). Biodiverse or barren school grounds: Their effects on children. Children, Youth and Environments, 20(2), 67–115.Google Scholar
  64. Savery, J. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Scott, G., Boyd, M., & Colquhoun, D. (2013). Changing spaces, changing relationships: the positive impact of learning out of doors. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 17(1), 47–53.Google Scholar
  66. Sharma, M., Stewart, C., & Prosser, M. (2006). On the use of phenomenography in the analysis of qualitative data. Physics Education Research Conference, 720(1), 41–44.Google Scholar
  67. Skelly, S. M., & Bradley, J. C. (2007). The growing phenomenon of school gardens: Measuring their variation and their affect on students' sense of responsibility and attitudes toward science and the environment. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 6(1), 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, C., & Landry, M. (2013). The wonder of worms: inquiry-based learning for early elementary students. Science and Children, 6(58), 58–63.Google Scholar
  69. Stan, I., & Humberstone, B. (2012). An ethnography of the outdoor classroom - how teachers manage risk. Ethnography and Education, 6(2), 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Toronto District School Board, & Evergreen. (2013). Landscape and child development: A design guide for early years-kindergarten play-learning environments. Toronto.Google Scholar
  71. Valley, W., Wittman, H., Ahmed, S., Jordan, N., Galt, R. (2017). An emerging signature pedagogy for sustainable food systems education. Renewable Agriculture And Food Systems, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170517000199.
  72. Wake, S. (2008). ‘In the best interests of the child’: Juggling the geography of children’s gardens (between adult agendas and children’s needs). Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1999). School gardening: Improving environmental attitudes of children through hands-on learning. Journal of environmental horticulture.Google Scholar
  74. Walker, A., Leary, H., Hmelo-Silver, C., & Ertmer, P. A. (Eds.). (2015). Essential readings in problem-based learning: Exploring and extending the legacy of Howard S. Barrows. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Warren, K. (2005). A path worth taking: The development of social justice in outdoor experiential education. Equity & Excellence in Education: University of Massachusetts School of Education Journal, 38, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Warren, K., Roberts, N., Breunig, M., & Alvaraz, M. (2014). Social justice in outdoor experiential education: A state of knowledge review. The Journal of Experimental Education, 37(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Williams, D., & Dixon, P. (2013). Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Outdoor Education Australia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brock UniversitySt. CatherinesCanada

Personalised recommendations