Affordances guiding Forest School practice: the application of the ecological dynamics approach

  • Vinathe Sharma-Brymer
  • Eric Brymer
  • Tonia Gray
  • Keith Davids
Original Paper


Forest School focuses on child development underlining nature-connection and play pedagogy. Practitioners facilitate child-led learning through a deep observation approach. However, challenges and assumptions exist in such approaches. Additionally, a critical examination of the practice reveals that it may be lacking a solid theoretical underpinning that can respond to diverse contexts and participants while escaping a one-size-fits-all approach encouraged by commercialisation. Ecological Dynamics offers a theoretical framework that has the potential to guide Forest School practice and clarify its effectiveness. Specifically, notions of affordances combined with analysis at the level of person-environment relationships could guide future design and implementation of activities. Benefits could include realising and attuning to affordances which have sociocultural and individual connotations, thereby respecting local cultures and their community resources. The role of the Forest School practitioner becomes one of facilitating diverse populations in their perception of affordances in nature for individualised benefits, including well-being.


Forest School Ecological dynamics Affordances Person-environment relationships 


  1. Aadland, H., Arnesen, T., & Nerland, J. (2009). Friluftsliv in the Norwegian lower secondary school. In H. Ibsen (Eds.), The birth of friluftsliv conference proceedings: a 150 year international dialogue (pp. 1–14). North Troendelag University College, Levanger, Norway, September 14–19. Available from:
  2. Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2011). What exactly is acquired during skill acquisition? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 7–23.Google Scholar
  3. Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature of udeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Educaiton & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentsen, P., Mygind, E. & Randrup, T. (2008). Towards an understanding of Udeskole: education outside the classroom in a Danish context. Paper presented at the 4th International Mountain and Outdoor Sports Conference, November 20th–23, Hrubá Skála (CZ) Czech Republic, Scholar
  5. Bentsen, P., Ho, S., Gray, T., & Waite, S. (2017). A global view of learning outside the classroom. In S. Waite (Ed.), Children learning outside the classroom (2nd ed., pp. 53–66). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bruineberg, J., & Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(599), 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Brymer, E., & Davids, K. (2013). Ecological dynamics as a theoretical framework for development of sustainable behaviours towards the environment. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), pp. 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brymer, E., & Davids, K. (2014). Experiential learning as a constraints-led process: an ecological dynamics perspective. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brymer, E., & Davids, K. (2016). Designing environments to enhance physical activity and psychological wellbeing. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 925–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brymer, E., Davids, K., & Mallabon, L. (2014). Understanding the psychological health and well-being benefits of physical activity in nature: an ecological dynamics analysis. Ecopsychology, 6, 189–197.Google Scholar
  11. Chow, J.-Y., Davids, K., Hristovski, R., Araújo, D., & Passos, P. (2011). Nonlinear pedagogy: learning design for self-organizing neurobiological systems. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clough, P., Houge Mackenzie, S., Mallabon, E., & Brymer, E. (2016). Adventurous physical activity environments: a mainstream intervention for mental health. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 963–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cordovil, R., Araújo, D., Pepping, G.-J., et al. (2015). An ecological stance on risk and safe behaviors in children: the role of affordances and emergent behaviors. New Ideas in Psychology, 36, 50–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cree, J., & McCree, M. (2012). A brief history of FS in the UK-part 2. Horizons, No. 62,
  15. Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: a constraints led approach. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  16. Davids, K., Araújo, D., & Brymer, E. (2016). Designing affordances for physical activity: an ecological dynamics perspective. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 933–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davies, G. (2013, January 2). History of Forest School. Retrieved from
  18. Dunwoody, P. T. (2006). The neglect of the environment by cognitive psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26, 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ewert, A. W., Sibthorp, J., & Sibthorp, R. J. (2014). Outdoor adventure education: foundations, theory, and research. Champaign: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  20. Forest School Association. (n.d.) History of Forest School. Accessed 12/9/2016.
  21. Gelter, H. (2000) Friluftsliv: the Scandinavian philosophy of outdoor life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 77–90, [Online]. Available from:
  22. Gelter, H. (2009). Friluftsliv as slow and peak experiences in the transmodern society. Henrik Ibsen: The Birth of “Friluftsliv”, A 150 Year International Dialogue Conference Jubilee Celebration. North Troendelag University College, Levanger, Norway. September 14–19.Google Scholar
  23. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Gill, T. (2007). No fear: growing up in a risk averse society. London: CalousteGulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsburry Publishing Plc.Google Scholar
  26. Guerin, S., & Kunkle, D. (2004). Emergence of constraint in self-organized systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 131–146.Google Scholar
  27. Gurholt, K. (2014). Joy of nature, friluftsliv education and self: combining narrative and cultural–ecological approaches to environmental sustainability. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 14(3), 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harris, F. (2017). The nature of learning at FS: practitioners’ perspective. Education, 3–13, 45(2), 272–291.Google Scholar
  29. Hart, V., Whatman, S., McLaughlin, J., & Sharma-Brymer, V. (2012). Pre-service teachers’ pedagogical relationships and experiences of embedding Indigenous Australian knowledge in teaching practicum. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 42(5), 703–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, B. (2002). A Playworker’s taxonomy of play type (2nd ed.). London: PlayLink.Google Scholar
  31. Jordet, A. (2009). What is outdoor learning? In OUTLiNES: outdoor learning in elementary schools, from grassroot to curriculum in teacher education. A didactic manual developed by Comenius Project, European Commission.Google Scholar
  32. Knight, S. (2009). Forest Schools and outdoor learning in the early years. London: Sage Publications Inc..Google Scholar
  33. Knight, S. (2011). Forest School as a way of learning in the outdoors in the UK. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), 1(1), 590–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laevers, F. (2015). Making care and education more effective through wellbeing and involvement. An introduction to Experiential Education. Available online:
  35. Leather, M. (2018). A critique of “Forest School” or something lost in translation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 21(1), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maitney, P. T. (2002). Mind in the gap: summary of research exploring ‘inner’ influences on pro-sustainability learning and behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Massey, S. (2005). The benefits of a Forest School experience for children in their early years. Action Research, Topic, 33, 27–34.Google Scholar
  38. Maynard, T. (2007). Forest Schools in Great Britain: an initial exploration. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 8(4), 320–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muñoz, S.A. (2009). Children in the outdoors: a literature review. Sustainable Development Research Centre.
  40. Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of co-ordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor development in children: aspects of co-ordination and control. Dodrech: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  41. O’Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2006). A marvellous opportunity for children to learn: a participatory evaluation of Forest School in England and Wales (p. 52). Forest Research: Surrey.Google Scholar
  42. O’Brien, L., & Murray, R. (2007). Forest School and its impacts on young children: case studies in Britain. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Brien, L. (2009). Learning outdoors: the Forest School approach. Education, 3–13, 37(1), 45–60.Google Scholar
  44. Pinder, R. A., Davids, K., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2011). Representative learning design and functionality of research and practice in sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 33, 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Playwork. (n.d.). Accessed 23 Nov 2016.
  46. Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26, 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The emotional affordances of forest settings: an investigation in boys with extreme behavioural problems. Landscape Research, 36(5), 535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Said, I. (2012). Affordances of nearby forest and orchard on children’s performances. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 38, 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sharma-Brymer, V., & Bland, D. (2016). Bringing Nature to schools to promote children’s physical activity. Sports Medicine, 46(7), 955–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sharma-Brymer, V., Brymer, E., & Davids, K. (2015). The relationship between physical activity in green space and human health and wellbeing: an ecological dynamics perspective. Journal of Physical Education Research, 2(I), 7–22.Google Scholar
  51. Stewart, A. (2008). Whose place, whose history? Outdoor environmental education pedagogy as ‘reading’ the landscape. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 8(2), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stoffregen, T. A. (2003). Affordances as properties of the animal-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waite, S., Bølling, M., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Comparing apples and pears? A conceptual framework for understanding forms of outdoor learning through comparison of English Forest Schools and Danish udeskole. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 868–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Whap, G. (2001). A Torres Strait Islander perspective on the concept of Indigenous Knowledge. Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 29(2), 22–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Withagen, R., De Poel, H. J., Araújo, D., & Pepping, G. (2012). Affordances can invite behaviour: reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(2), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Outdoor Education Australia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinathe Sharma-Brymer
    • 1
  • Eric Brymer
    • 1
  • Tonia Gray
    • 2
  • Keith Davids
    • 3
  1. 1.Leeds Beckett UniversityLeedsUK
  2. 2.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations