Abstract
Effectiveness studies regarding mobile integration in teaching and learning L2 listening have shown positive results in listening comprehension and in listening strategy development. The present study furthered this line of research by investigating whether metacognitive strategy instruction and mobile-based exercises could improve adolescent EFL learners’ listening abilities and metacognitive awareness. The study recruited three intact classes of 12th graders in a high school in Taiwan to participate in an English listening program for 10 weeks. The participants had a low English proficiency level but were proficient with their smartphones. Each of the three classes had 30 students and was randomly assigned to the metacognitive and mobile experimental group (mobile), the metacognitive experimental group (non-mobile), and the control group. During the 10-week treatment period, both experimental groups of mobile and non-mobile received intensive metacognitive strategy instruction in class, and the mobile group received mobile-based exercises after classes for extra listening practices. The control group received neither. All three groups took a listening proficiency test and completed the metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire before and after the listening program. Some selected students from both experimental groups were interviewed after the program ended. The results did not reveal significant effects of the metacognitive strategy instruction and the mobile-based exercises between the two experimental groups. When compared with the control group, the mobile group yielded a significant effect in listening comprehension and both experimental groups excelled significantly in metacognitive awareness. From their interviews, our adolescent EFL learners approved the listening program focusing on metacognitive strategies and praised the convenience of mobile-based exercises.
行動科技對第二語言的聽力學習不管是理解或是策略兩方面都已有正向結果。本研究旨在接續此項研究,繼續探討結合後設認知策略與行動科技的聽力教學,是否能夠增進臺灣青少年聽力的學習及後設認知的知覺。研究的對象是臺灣某公立高中職的高三學生三班,學生們的英語能力頗低但是使用手機的能力很強。這三班每班皆為卅人,隨機將這三班分為三組,分別是:後設認知策略及手機組(行動組)、後設認知策略(非行動組)、及控制組。在十週的聽力課程中,兩組實驗組都在課堂中接受後設認知策略的聽力教學,而行動組另外在課後從手機接受額外的聽力練習。控制組則兩者皆無。三組在實驗前、後都進行聽力測驗以及聽力的後設認知知覺問卷測驗。兩組實驗組的部分學生在實驗結束後接受訪談。研究結果顯示,兩組實驗組在後設認知聽力教學及行動科技輔助練習上,沒有顯著差異。在與控制組的比較方面,行動組在聽力測驗的成就上優於控制組,兩個實驗組則在後設認知知覺上高於控制組的表現。而在訪談的結果中,學生們肯定後設認知策略的聽力教學,同時也對手機上聽力練習的便利性讚賞不已。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95.
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211021821. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211021821
Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 266–280.
Barjesteh, H., & Ghaseminia, M. (2019). Effects of pre-listening task types on the development of EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. International Journal of Listening, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1654867
Becker, S. R. (2021). Metacognitive instruction in L2 French: An analysis of listening performance and automaticity. Foreign Language Annals, 54(1), 9–26.
Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149–161.
Burston, J. (2014). The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103–125.
Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.
Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408–416.
Cross, J. (2014). Promoting autonomous listening to podcasts: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 8–32.
de la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners’ attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: The role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261–276.
Demouy, V., & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217–232.
Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence. Erlbaum.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9–12.
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232.
Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75.
Hwang, G. J., & Fu, Q. K. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: A review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567–581.
Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Schuck, S. (2019). Disrupting education using smart mobile pedagogies. In Didactics of Smart Pedagogy (pp. 139–157). Springer.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165.
Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revised and updated version]. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley.
Maftoon, P., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2020). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1–20.
Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1–13.
Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 323–348.
Nah, K. C., White, P., & Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using a mobile phone to access the Internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. ReCALL, 20(3), 331–347.
O’Brien, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Integrating CALL into the classroom: The role of podcasting in an ESL listening strategies course. ReCALL, 19(2), 162–180.
Panagiotidis, P. (2021, July). Podcasts in language learning research review and future perspective. In: Proceedings of EDULEARN21 Conference (Vol. 5, p. 6th).
Read, T., & Barcena, E. (2016). Metacognition as scaffolding for the development of listening comprehension in a social MALL App. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 103–120.
Read, T., & Kukulska-Hume, A. (2015). The role of a mobile app for listening comprehension training in distance learning to sustain student motivation. Journal of Universal Computer Science = J.UCS, 21(10), 1327–1338.
Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. (2011). ‘Teacher, the tape is too fast!’ Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59.
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting “podagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 471–492.
Salmon, G., & Nie, M. (2008). Doubling the life of iPods. Podcasting for Learning in Universities, 1–11.
Şendağ, S., Gedik, N., & Toker, S. (2018). Impact of repetitive listening, listening-aid and podcast length on EFL podcast listening. Computers & Education, 125, 273–283.
Shadiev, R., Liu, T., & Hwang, W. Y. (2020). Review of research on mobile-assisted language learning in familiar, authentic environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 709–720.
Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Yang, J. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84.
Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive pedagogical sequence for less-proficient Thai EFL listeners: A comparative investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103.
Vandergrift, L. (2003a). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students: Through the process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 59(3), 425–440.
Vandergrift, L. (2003b). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463–496.
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462.
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497.
Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hung, Yh., Lin, Cc. Metacognitive Strategy Instruction and Mobile-Based Exercises for Adolescent EFL Listeners in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning 47, 241–262 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00112-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00112-x
Keywords
- EFL listening
- Metacognitive awareness
- Mobile-assisted language learning
- Mobile-assisted listening learning