Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metacognitive Strategy Instruction and Mobile-Based Exercises for Adolescent EFL Listeners in Taiwan

結合後設認知策略與行動科技的聽力教學對臺灣青少年學習英語聽力的影響

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
English Teaching & Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effectiveness studies regarding mobile integration in teaching and learning L2 listening have shown positive results in listening comprehension and in listening strategy development. The present study furthered this line of research by investigating whether metacognitive strategy instruction and mobile-based exercises could improve adolescent EFL learners’ listening abilities and metacognitive awareness. The study recruited three intact classes of 12th graders in a high school in Taiwan to participate in an English listening program for 10 weeks. The participants had a low English proficiency level but were proficient with their smartphones. Each of the three classes had 30 students and was randomly assigned to the metacognitive and mobile experimental group (mobile), the metacognitive experimental group (non-mobile), and the control group. During the 10-week treatment period, both experimental groups of mobile and non-mobile received intensive metacognitive strategy instruction in class, and the mobile group received mobile-based exercises after classes for extra listening practices. The control group received neither. All three groups took a listening proficiency test and completed the metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire before and after the listening program. Some selected students from both experimental groups were interviewed after the program ended. The results did not reveal significant effects of the metacognitive strategy instruction and the mobile-based exercises between the two experimental groups. When compared with the control group, the mobile group yielded a significant effect in listening comprehension and both experimental groups excelled significantly in metacognitive awareness. From their interviews, our adolescent EFL learners approved the listening program focusing on metacognitive strategies and praised the convenience of mobile-based exercises.

行動科技對第二語言的聽力學習不管是理解或是策略兩方面都已有正向結果。本研究旨在接續此項研究,繼續探討結合後設認知策略與行動科技的聽力教學,是否能夠增進臺灣青少年聽力的學習及後設認知的知覺。研究的對象是臺灣某公立高中職的高三學生三班,學生們的英語能力頗低但是使用手機的能力很強。這三班每班皆為卅人,隨機將這三班分為三組,分別是:後設認知策略及手機組(行動組)、後設認知策略(非行動組)、及控制組。在十週的聽力課程中,兩組實驗組都在課堂中接受後設認知策略的聽力教學,而行動組另外在課後從手機接受額外的聽力練習。控制組則兩者皆無。三組在實驗前、後都進行聽力測驗以及聽力的後設認知知覺問卷測驗。兩組實驗組的部分學生在實驗結束後接受訪談。研究結果顯示,兩組實驗組在後設認知聽力教學及行動科技輔助練習上,沒有顯著差異。在與控制組的比較方面,行動組在聽力測驗的成就上優於控制組,兩個實驗組則在後設認知知覺上高於控制組的表現。而在訪談的結果中,學生們肯定後設認知策略的聽力教學,同時也對手機上聽力練習的便利性讚賞不已。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdous, M. H., Camarena, M. M., & Facer, B. R. (2009). MALL technology: Use of academic podcasting in the foreign language classroom. ReCALL, 21(1), 76–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2021). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211021821. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211021821

  • Alm, A. (2013). Extensive listening 2.0 with foreign language podcasts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barjesteh, H., & Ghaseminia, M. (2019). Effects of pre-listening task types on the development of EFL learners’ listening comprehension ability. International Journal of Listening, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1654867

  • Becker, S. R. (2021). Metacognitive instruction in L2 French: An analysis of listening performance and automaticity. Foreign Language Annals, 54(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149–161.

  • Burston, J. (2014). The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO Journal, 31(1), 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65(4), 408–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J. (2014). Promoting autonomous listening to podcasts: A case study. Language Teaching Research, 18(1), 8–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente, M. J. (2014). Learners’ attention to input during focus on form listening tasks: The role of mobile technology in the second language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(3), 261–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demouy, V., & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: Using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217–232.

  • Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The Nature of Intelligence. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2005). Skype and podcasting: Disruptive technologies for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., & Fu, Q. K. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: A review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M., Burden, K., & Schuck, S. (2019). Disrupting education using smart mobile pedagogies. In Didactics of Smart Pedagogy (pp. 139–157). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2018). Mobile-assisted language learning [Revised and updated version]. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maftoon, P., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2020). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1–13.

  • Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 323–348.

  • Nah, K. C., White, P., & Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using a mobile phone to access the Internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. ReCALL, 20(3), 331–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, A., & Hegelheimer, V. (2007). Integrating CALL into the classroom: The role of podcasting in an ESL listening strategies course. ReCALL, 19(2), 162–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidis, P. (2021, July). Podcasts in language learning research review and future perspective. In: Proceedings of EDULEARN21 Conference (Vol. 5, p. 6th).

  • Read, T., & Barcena, E. (2016). Metacognition as scaffolding for the development of listening comprehension in a social MALL App. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(1), 103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, T., & Kukulska-Hume, A. (2015). The role of a mobile app for listening comprehension training in distance learning to sustain student motivation. Journal of Universal Computer Science = J.UCS, 21(10), 1327–1338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renandya, W. A., & Farrell, T. S. (2011). ‘Teacher, the tape is too fast!’ Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting “podagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 471–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, G., & Nie, M. (2008). Doubling the life of iPods. Podcasting for Learning in Universities, 1–11.

  • Şendağ, S., Gedik, N., & Toker, S. (2018). Impact of repetitive listening, listening-aid and podcast length on EFL podcast listening. Computers & Education, 125, 273–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadiev, R., Liu, T., & Hwang, W. Y. (2020). Review of research on mobile-assisted language learning in familiar, authentic environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(3), 709–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sung, Y., Chang, K., & Yang, J. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive pedagogical sequence for less-proficient Thai EFL listeners: A comparative investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2003a). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students: Through the process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes, 59(3), 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2003b). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53(3), 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40(3), 191–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60(2), 470–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Explaining listening comprehension among L2 learners of English: The contribution of general language proficiency, vocabulary knowledge and metacognitive awareness. System, 65, 139–150.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-cheng Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Sample lesson and titles of all lessons
Table 5 Procedure of metacognitive strategy instruction
Table 6 Questions for the semi-structured interviews

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hung, Yh., Lin, Cc. Metacognitive Strategy Instruction and Mobile-Based Exercises for Adolescent EFL Listeners in Taiwan. English Teaching & Learning 47, 241–262 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00112-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-022-00112-x

Keywords

關鍵詞

Navigation