Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Beginner Teachers’ Sources of Knowledge for Teaching Literature in ESL Classrooms

英語新手教師之課室研究 : 文學教學的知識來源

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
English Teaching & Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify beginner teachers’ sources of knowledge for teaching literature in the English Second Language (ESL) classroom. A review of the literature on ESL teachers’ knowledge indicated a paucity of studies that focus specifically on teaching knowledge for Literature as a stand-alone subject in ESL. In addition, ESL teacher training in most countries seemingly focuses on preparing pre-service teachers for language teaching rather than literature. To identify the sources of teaching knowledge for Literature teachers, this study adopted an interpretivist epistemological worldview and used a qualitative single case study design. Data were collected using non-participant observations and semi-structured interviews from four purposively selected Literature in English beginner teachers. Quality and ethical considerations were upheld in this study using a number of strategies. Inductive thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The analysis resulted in three sources of ESL Literature teaching, namely, theory of language education, the nature of the subject and problematic areas in Literature teaching. The findings may be of benefit to ESL teacher preparation programmes which could use them to provide pre-service teachers with multiple contexts as sources of teaching knowledge.

本研究旨在發現新手教師在英語為第二語言教室的文學教學知識來源。根據以英語為第二語言教師知識的文獻回顧, 發現在文獻上, 缺乏以英語為第二語言的文學教學知識之獨立學科研究。在大部分的國家, 以英語為第二語言的教師培訓似乎著重於職前教師的語言教學, 而非文學教學。為了發現文學教師的教學知識來源, 本研究採用詮釋主義的認識論觀點及質性單一個案研究設計。研究資料蒐集使用非參與觀察研究以及半結構式訪談等方法。然後, 選出四名英語文學教學的新手教師來進行訪談。本研究使用許多策略來維持品質和倫理的考量。研究資料分析採用歸納主題分析法。最後本研究獲致了以下三項以英語為第二語言文學教學的知識來源:一、語言教育理論; 二、學科性質; 三、文學教學的相關問題。上述研究結果將有利於以英語為第二語言的教師預備課程; 進而提供職前教師多樣性背景為教學知識來源。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buitink, J. (2009). What and how do student teachers learn during school-based teacher education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead J. 1996. Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. Retrieved 12, December 2016, from www.psycnet.apa.org.

  • Cheng, M. M., Tang, S. Y., & Cheng, A. Y. (2012). Practicalising theoretical knowledge in student teachers’ professional learning in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 781–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, F. M., Clandinin, D. J., & He, F. (1997). Teachers’ personal practical knowledge on the professional knowledge landscape. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(7), 665–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGraff, T. L., Schmidt, C. M., & Waddell, J. H. (2015). Field-based teacher education in literacy: preparing teachers in real classroom contexts. Teaching Education, 26(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiYanni, R. (2000). Literature: reading fiction, poetry, and drama. Columbus: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: a study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. P., & Strevens, D. (2015). English teaching in secondary schools: linking theory and practices (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli, M. (2015). Becoming an English language teacher: linguistic knowledge, anxieties and the shifting sense of identity. Language and Education, 29(5), 416–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. (2012). More than canons: teacher knowledge and the literary domain of secondary English curriculum. Educational Research, 54(4), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., & McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S. (2000). Teaching as a knowledge-based activity. Oxford Review of Education, 26(4), 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanyongo, G. Y. (2005). Zimbabwe’s public education system reforms: successes and challenges. International Education Journal, 6(1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: what do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2010). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlynn-Stewart, M. (2015). From student to beginning teacher: learning strengths and teaching challenges. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamine, T. (2007). Reconceptualising teacher knowledge and belief based on social constructivism. Journal of the Faculty of Letters, Prefectural University of Kumamoto, 13(66), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, J. (2007). Analysing qualitative data. In K. Maree (Ed.), First steps in research (pp. 98–122). Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivero, M. M. (2015). Multilingualism in an EFL practicum: increasing student teachers’ pedagogical knowledge. TESOL Journal, 6(2), 382–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suter, W. N. (2006). Introduction to educational research: a critical thinking approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner-Bisset, R. (1999). The knowledge bases of the expert teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzun, L. (2016). Evaluation of the latest English language teacher training programme in Turkey: teacher trainees’ perspective. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1147–1165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimbabwean Ordinary Level Literature Syllabus (2013). Retrieved on 7, December 2015, from http://www.mopse.gov.zw/index.php/o-level?download=227:o-level-english-literature-pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nhlanhla Mpofu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mpofu, N., de Jager, L. Exploring Beginner Teachers’ Sources of Knowledge for Teaching Literature in ESL Classrooms. English Teaching & Learning 42, 57–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0003-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-018-0003-7

Keywords

Navigation