Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized shearing strategy for heavy plate based on contour recognition

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shearing line is the key to improve the quality and efficiency of heavy plates. A model of contour recognition and intelligent shearing strategy for the heavy plate was proposed. Firstly, multi-array binocular vision linear cameras were used to complete the image acquisition. Secondly, the total length of the steel plate after cooling was predicted by back propagation neural network algorithm according to the contour data. Finally, using the scanning line and a new camber description method, the shearing strategy including head/tail irregular shape length and rough dividing strategy was calculated. The practical application shows that the model and strategy can effectively solve the problems existing in the shearing process and can effectively improve the yield of steel plates. The maximum error of detection width, length, camber, and the length of the irregular deformation area at the head/tail of the plate are all less than 5 mm. The correlation coefficient of the length prediction model based on the back propagation neural network is very high. The reverse ratio result of edge cutting failure using the proposed rough dividing strategy is 1/401 = 0.2%, which is 2% higher than that by human.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.H. Zhang, L. Deng, L.Z. Che, J. Manuf. Process. 75 (2022) 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Chen, Q.W. Cai, B.S. Xie, Y. Yang, Z.Y. Zhao, Steel Res. Int. 89 (2018) 1800409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Schausberger, A. Steinboeck, A. Kugi, IEEE Tran. Control Syst. Technol. 26 (2017) 842–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X.M. He, T.X. Zhao, F. Shen, Q. Liu, Y. Fang, Q.H. Hu, Biosyst. Eng. 201 (2021) 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Li, X. Wang, L. Ji, in: 2019 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacturing, Dublin, Ireland, 2019, pp. 19264717.

  6. J.G. Ding, G.Q. Wang, Y. He, L. Kong, Z. Zhao, Steel Res. Int. 91 (2020) 1900345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Bahrami, M.K. Khouzani, S. Mokhtari, S. Zareh, M. Mehr, Metals 9 (2019) 801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Sun, Y. An, in: 2009 International Conference on Test and Measurement, Hong Kong, China, 2009, pp. 161–164.

  9. M. Kim, W. Lee, J. Yoo, P. Park, in: 2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Busan, Korea (South), 2015, 15680799.

  10. N. Kong, J. Yoo, J. Lee, S. Yun, J. Nae, P. Park, Optical Eng. 50 (2011) 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Fraga, R. Gonzalez, J. Cancelas, L. Enguita, L. Loredo, in: Conference Record of the 2004 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, 39th IAS Annual Meeting, Seattle, USA, 2004, 8213390.

  12. Y. Yang, C. Chen, C. Ho, W. Li, J. Wu, in: 2008 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, IEEE, Edmonton, Canada, 2008, 10323104.

  13. J. Ding, Y. He, L. Kong, W. Peng, ISIJ Int. 61 (2021) 2540–2551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kumar, S. Rath, M. Kumar, Materials Today: Proceedings 42 (2021) 650–659.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Gerasimova, O. Mishedchenko, V. Devyatiarova, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 709 (2020) 022016.

  16. G. Wang, K. Qian, Acta Opt. Sin. 40 (2020) 181–193.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Ruan, L. Zhang, S. Gu, W. He, S. Chen, Ironmak. Steelmak. 41 (2014) 199–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. B. Wang, Z. Wang, B. Wang, G. Wang, R. Misra, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46 (2015) 2834–2843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Z. Zhou, Machine learning, Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Z.Y. Dong, W.M. Xu, J. Xu, H. Zhuang, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 310 (2019) 022036.

  21. Z. Dong, X. Li, F. Luan, D. Zhang, J. Manuf. Process. 77 (2022) 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. X. Han, Z. Wei, B. Zhang, Y. Li, T. Du, H. Chen, Journal of Hydrology 596 (2021) 126104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper was prepared under the support of the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (Grant No. 2022-MS-277). This research was also financially supported by the Youth Project of Foundation of Liaoning Province Education Administration (Grant No. lnqn202016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-zhao Cao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, Jz., Wang, Yx., Huang, Sw. et al. Optimized shearing strategy for heavy plate based on contour recognition. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 30, 1821–1833 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-023-00936-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-023-00936-2

Keywords

Navigation