Skip to main content
Log in

Adhesion-enhancing coating embedded with osteogenesis-promoting PDA/HA nanoparticles for peri-implant soft tissue sealing and osseointegration

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Bio-Design and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following dental implantation, the characteristic bacterial milieu of the oral cavity may lead to peri-implant inflammation, which can negatively impact osseointegration and cause implant failure. To improve soft tissue sealing around the implant, enhance osseointegration, and improve implant success rates, this paper proposes a composite multifunctional coating (PHG) prepared using gelatin and polydopamine/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles, investigates the effects of this novel coating on cell adhesion, proliferation, antibacterial activity, osteogenic differentiation, and evaluates its immune-related properties. The PHG coating was proved to have satisfactory hydrophilicity and wettability for cell attachment. Furthermore, it improved the expression of adhesion-related genes and proteins in human gingival fibroblasts, indicating its adhesion-promoting effect. Additionally, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells exhibited strong osteogenic differentiation potential and mineralization on PHG-coated surfaces. Notably, the PHG coating exhibited antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans, as well as anti-inflammatory effects, potentially via the regulation of macrophages. Therefore, the proposed PHG coating may promote soft tissue sealing and bone bonding, providing a potential strategy for the surface modification of dental implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papathanasiou E, Finkelman M, Hanley J et al (2016) Prevalence, etiology and treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a survey of periodontists in the United States. J Periodontol 87(5):493–501. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2015.150476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Parma-Benfenati S, Roncati M, Tinti C (2013) Treatment of peri-implantitis: surgical therapeutic approaches based on peri-implantitis defects. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 33(5):627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Das S, Dholam K, Gurav S et al (2019) Accentuated osseointegration in osteogenic nanofibrous coated titanium implants. Sci Rep 9(1):17638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53884-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M et al (1999) The effect of heat treatment on bone-bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium. Biomaterials 20(5):491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(98)90203-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoppe A, Will J, Detsch R et al (2014) Formation and in vitro biocompatibility of biomimetic hydroxyapatite coatings on chemically treated carbon substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(1):193–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iezzi G, Scarano A, Petrone G et al (2007) Two human hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants retrieved after a 14-year loading period: a histologic and histomorphometric case report. J Periodontol 78(5):940–947. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pang X, Huang Y (2012) Physical properties of nano-HAs/ZrO2 coating on surface of titanium materials used in dental-implants and its biological compatibility. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 12(2):902–910. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2012.5666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yazdani J, Ahmadian E, Sharifi S et al (2018) A short view on nanohydroxyapatite as coating of dental implants. Biomed Pharmacother 105:553–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe B, Venkatesan J, Anil S et al (2016) Preparation and characterization of chitosan-natural nano hydroxyapatite-fucoidan nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 93(Pt B):1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.02.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu Q, Xu M, Lin CY et al (2019) Metal coordination-mediated functional grading and self-healing in mussel byssus cuticle. Adv Sci (Weinh) 6(23):1902043. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201902043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carter PH, Scherle PA, Muckelbauer JK et al (2001) Photochemically enhanced binding of small molecules to the tumor necrosis factor receptor-1 inhibits the binding of TNF-alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(21):11879–11884. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.21117839812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Meyle J (2012) Mechanical, chemical and laser treatments of the implant surface in the presence of marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantol 5(Suppl):S71–S81

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang M, Wu H, Li Q et al (2019) Novel aptamer-functionalized nanoparticles enhances bone defect repair by improving stem cell recruitment. Int J Nanomed 14:8707–8724. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S223164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshinari M, Hayakawa T, Matsuzaka K et al (2006) Oxygen plasma surface modification enhances immobilization of simvastatin acid. Biomed Res 27(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.2220/biomedres.27.29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fassina L, Saino E, Visai L et al (2010) Use of a gelatin cryogel as biomaterial scaffold in the differentiation process of human bone marrow stromal cells. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010:247–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang F, Zhao SF, Zhang F et al (2011) Simvastatin-loaded porous implant surfaces stimulate preosteoblasts differentiation: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 111(5):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu J, Zheng A, Liu Y et al (2019) Enhanced bone regeneration of the silk fibroin electrospun scaffolds through the modification of the graphene oxide functionalized by BMP-2 peptide. Int J NanoMed 14:733–751. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S187664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu J, Cao L, Liu Y et al (2019) Functionalization of silk fibroin electrospun scaffolds via BMSC affinity peptide grafting through oxidative self-polymerization of dopamine for bone regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interf 11(9):8878–8895. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b22123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiao D, Cao L, Liu Y et al (2019) Synergistic osteogenesis of biocompatible reduced graphene oxide with methyl vanillate in BMSCs. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 5(4):1920–1936. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He J, Zhu X, Qi Z et al (2015) Killing dental pathogens using antibacterial graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interf 7(9):5605–5611. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shibata Y, Suzuki D, Omori S et al (2010) The characteristics of in vitro biological activity of titanium surfaces anodically oxidized in chloride solutions. Biomaterials 31(33):8546–8555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen TW, Ramachandran R, Chen SM et al (2020) Graphene and perovskite-based nanocomposite for both electrochemical and gas sensor applications: an overview. Sensors (Basel) 20(23):6755. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20236755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho CC, Ding SJ (2013) The pH-controlled nanoparticles size of polydopamine for anti-cancer drug delivery. J Mater Sci Mater Med 24(10):2381–2390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4994-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saita M, Ikeda T, Yamada M, Kimoto K, Lee MC, Ogawa T (2016) UV photofunctionalization promotes nano-biomimetic apatite deposition on titanium. Int J Nanomed 11:223–234

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lu M, Chen H, Yuan B, Zhou Y, Min L, Xiao Z et al (2020) Electrochemical deposition of nanostructured hydroxyapatite coating on titanium with enhanced early stage osteogenic activity and osseointegration. Int J Nanomed 15:6605–6618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma H, Luo J, Sun Z et al (2016) 3D printing of biomaterials with mussel-inspired nanostructures for tumor therapy and tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 111:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mezu-Ndubuisi OJ, Maheshwari A (2021) The role of integrins in inflammation and angiogenesis. Pediatr Res 89(7):1619–1626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-01177-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian J, Zhang FJ, Lei GH (2015) Role of integrins and their ligands in osteoarthritic cartilage. Rheumatol Int 35(5):787–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-014-3137-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ye J, Huang B, Gong P (2021) Nerve growth factor-chondroitin sulfate/hydroxyapatite-coating composite implant induces early osseointegration and nerve regeneration of peri-implant tissues in Beagle dogs. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02177-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karimi Z, Ghorbani M, Hashemibeni B et al (2015) Evaluation of the proliferation and viability rates of nucleus pulposus cells of human intervertebral disk in fabricated chitosan-gelatin scaffolds by freeze drying and freeze gelation methods. Adv Biomed Res 4:251. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9175.170676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saidin S, Chevallier P, Abdul KM et al (2013) Polydopamine as an intermediate layer for silver and hydroxyapatite immobilisation on metallic biomaterials surface. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 33(8):4715–4724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sang L, Huang J, Luo D et al (2010) Bone-like nanocomposites based on self-assembled protein-based matrices with Ca2+ capturing capability. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21(9):2561–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4117-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu P, Bao RY, Shi XJ et al (2017) Self-assembled high-strength hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym 155:507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fukuda A, Takemoto M, Saito T et al (2011) Bone bonding bioactivity of Ti metal and Ti-Zr-Nb-Ta alloys with Ca ions incorporated on their surfaces by simple chemical and heat treatments. Acta Biomater 7(3):1379–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.09.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cosmidis J, Benzerara K, Nassif N et al (2015) Characterization of Ca-phosphate biological materials by scanning transmission X-ray microscopy (STXM) at the Ca L2,3-, P L2,3- and C K-edges. Acta Biomater 12:260–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lim ZW, Chen WL (2020) Exploring the association of bone alkaline phosphatases and hearing loss. Sci Rep 10(1):4006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60979-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Trowsdale J, Martin D, Bicknell D et al (1990) Alkaline phosphatases. Biochem Soc Trans 18(2):178–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-005-5435-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gao G, Jiang YW, Jia HR et al (2019) Near-infrared light-controllable on-demand antibiotics release using thermo-sensitive hydrogel-based drug reservoir for combating bacterial infection. Biomaterials 188:83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yao C, Webster TJ, Hedrick M (2014) Decreased bacteria density on nanostructured polyurethane. J Biomed Mater Res A 102(6):1823–1828. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gao Q, Rhee C, Maruyama M et al (2021) The effects of macrophage phenotype on osteogenic differentiation of MSCs in the presence of polyethylene particles. Biomedicines 9(5):499. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Xu R, Shen X, Si Y et al (2018) MicroRNA-31a-5p from aging BMSCs links bone formation and resorption in the aged bone marrow microenvironment. Aging Cell 17(4):e12794. https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sun H, Dai K, Tang T et al (2009) Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by slit2 in osteoblastic cells. Cells Tissues Organs 190(2):69–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000178020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Darcy A, Meltzer M, Miller J et al (2012) A novel library screen identifies immunosuppressors that promote osteoblast differentiation. Bone 50(6):1294–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81801006, 31870953, 81901048, 81620108006, 81991505, 81921002, 81801023, and 82100963), Shanghai Rising-Star Program (21QA1405400), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC1102900), and Innovative Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai (No. SSMU-ZDCX20180900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, XZX and AZ; methodology, TSS; software, XW; data curation, LJP; writing—original draft preparation, AZ; writing—review and editing, LYC; visualization, AZ and JW; funding acquisition, XZX and XQJ. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianzhen Xin or Xinquan Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there were no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.

Ethical approval

All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed. All experimental protocols involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and followed the procedure for Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection of the Ninth People’s Hospital, which is affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SCXK (Shanghai) [201866]).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 269 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, T., Zheng, A., Cao, L. et al. Adhesion-enhancing coating embedded with osteogenesis-promoting PDA/HA nanoparticles for peri-implant soft tissue sealing and osseointegration. Bio-des. Manuf. 5, 233–248 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00184-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-022-00184-5

Keywords

Navigation