Skip to main content

Ship maneuvering prediction based on virtual captive model test and system dynamics approaches

Abstract

The maneuvering simulation is carried out through the continuous captive model test and the system dynamics approach. The mathematical maneuvering group (MMG) model is implemented in the virtual captive model tests by using the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques. The oblique towing test (OTT), the circular motion test (CMT), the rudder force test and the open water test are performed to obtain the hydrodynamic derivatives of the hull, the rudder and the propeller, and the results are validated by experimental data. By designing the tests, the number of cases is reduced to a low level, to allow us to evaluate the maneuverability with a low cost and in a short time. Using these obtained coefficients, the system-based maneuvering simulations are conducted to calculate the position and the attitude of the ship, with results in agreement with the free running test results. This procedure can also be used for other hull forms, with reduced workload and with convenience for maneuvering simulation tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Carrica P. M., Mofidi A., Eloot K. et al. Direct simulation and experimental study of zigzag maneuver of kcs in shallow water [J]. Ocean engineering, 2016, 112: 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mofidi A., Carrica P. M. Simulations of zigzag maneuvers for a container ship with direct moving rudder and propeller [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 96: 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubbioso G., Muscari R., Ortolani F. et al. Analysis of propeller bearing loads by CFD. Part I: Straight ahead and steady turning maneuvers [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 130: 241–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broglia R., Dubbioso G., Durante D. et al. Turning ability analysis of a fully appended twin screw vessel by CFD. Part I: Single rudder configuration [J]. Ocean engineering, 2015, 105: 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang J., Zou L., Wan D. Numerical simulations of zigzag maneuver of free running ship in waves by rans-overset grid method [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 162: 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shen Z., Wan D., Carrica P. M. Dynamic overset grids in openfoam with application to kcs self-propulsion and maneuvering [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2015, 108: 287–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J., Wan D. CFD study of ship stopping maneuver by overset grid technique [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 197: 106895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carrica P. M., Ismail F., Hyman M. et al. Turn and zigzag maneuvers of a surface combatant using a urans approach with dynamic overset grids [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2013, 18(2): 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yasukawa H., Yoshimura Y. Introduction of MMG standard method for ship maneuvering predictions [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2015, 20(1): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ITTC. Recommended procedures and guidelines: Captive model test [C]. Manoeuvring Committee of the 28th ITTC, Wuxi, China, 2017.

  11. ITTC. Recommended procedures and guidelines: Captive model test procedure [C]. Manoeuvring Committee of the 27th ITTC, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2014.

  12. Stern F., Agdrup K., Kim S. Y. et al. Experience from simman 2008—The first workshop on verification and validation of ship maneuvering simulation methods [J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2011, 55(2): 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simonsen C. D., Otzen J. F., Klimt C. et al. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using cfd generated pmm data [C]. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2012, 26–31.

  14. Sakamoto N., Carrica P. M., Stern F. Urans simulations of static and dynamic maneuvering for surface combatant: Part 1. verification and validation for forces, moment, and hydrodynamic derivatives [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2012, 17(4): 422–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo W., Soares C. G., Zou Z. Parameter identification of ship maneuvering model based on support vector machines and particle swarm optimization [J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2016, 138(3): 031101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sutulo S., Soares C. G. An algorithm for offline identification of ship manoeuvring mathematical models from freerunning tests [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 79: 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X., Zou Z., Xu F. et al. Sensitivity analysis and parametric identification for ship manoeuvring in 4 degrees of freedom [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2014, 19(4): 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khanh T. T., Ouahsine A., Naceur H. et al. Assessment of ship manoeuvrability by using a coupling between a nonlinear transient manoeuvring model and mathematical programming techniques [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(5): 788–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Du P., Ouahsine A., Toan K. T. et al. Simulation of ship maneuvering in a confined waterway using a nonlinear model based on optimization techniques [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 142: 194–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang X., Wang J., Wan D. Euler—lagrange study of bubble drag reduction in turbulent channel flow and boundary layer flow [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2020, 32(2): 027101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X. S., Wang J. H., Wan D. C. Numerical techniques for coupling hydrodynamic problems in ship and ocean engineering [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(2): 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S. P., Zhang A. M., Liu Y. L. et al. Bubble dynamics and its applications [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(6): 975–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xie Z., Zhang Y., Zhou J. et al. Theoretical and experimental research on the micro interface lubrication regime of water lubricated bearing [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 151: 107422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang J., Li H., Guo W. et al. Rayleigh—Taylor instability of cylindrical water droplet induced by laser-produced cavitation bubble [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 919: A42.

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Du P., Ouahsine A., Hoarau Y. Solid body motion prediction using a unit quaternion-based solver with actuator disk [J]. Comptes Rendus Mécanique, 2018, 346(12): 1136–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515110863), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3102020HHZY030004), the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shanxi (Grant No. 2020JC-18) and the Shanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2021KW-38).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hai-bao Hu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51979226, 52171324).

Biography: Peng Du (1989-), Male, Ph. D., Associate Professor

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Du, P., Cheng, L., Tang, Zj. et al. Ship maneuvering prediction based on virtual captive model test and system dynamics approaches. J Hydrodyn 34, 259–276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0029-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0029-0

Key words

  • Maneuvering simulation
  • captive model test (CMT)
  • system dynamics
  • computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
  • Hydrodynamic derivatives