Skip to main content
Log in

CFD simulations of three-dimensional violent sloshing flows in tanks based on MPS and GPU

  • Special Column on the 2020 Spheric Harbin International Workshop (Guest Editors A-Man Zhang, Shi-Ping Wang, Peng-Nan Sun)
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For violent sloshing, the flow field becomes complicated and 3-D effect is non-negligible. In addition to the excitation direction, the wave can also propagate perpendicular to the excitation direction. Due to the superposition of waves from different directions, the impact pressure imposed on the wall of the tank may increase. In this paper, our in-house solver MPSGPU-SJTU based on moving particle semi-implicit (MPS) method coupled with GPU techniques is employed for the liquid sloshing simulation, to study the factors leading to the 3-D effect. Firstly, a series of sloshing simulations are carried out to validate the reliability of present solver. Then, the sensitivity of 3-D effect against some parameters, such as excitation frequency, dimensions of the tank and filling ratio, is checked through numerical simulations. Time histories of pressure obtained by 2-D and 3-D simulations are compared to judge the occurrence of 3-D effect. It concludes that effects of those parameters are all significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim Y., Shin Y. S., Lee K. H. Numerical study on slosh-induced impact pressures on three-dimensional prismatic tanks [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2004, 26(5): 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee D. H., Kim M. H., Kwon S. H. et al. A parametric sensitivity study on LNG tank sloshing loads by numerical simulations [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2007, 34(1): 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Panigrahy P. K., Saha U. K., Maity D. Experimental studies on sloshing behavior due to horizontal movement of liquids in baffled tanks [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36(3–4): 213–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Graczyk M., Moan T. A. Probabilistic assessment of design sloshing pressure time histories in LNG tanks [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2008, 35(8–9): 834–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Belakroum R., Kadja M., Mai T. H. et al. An efficient passive technique for reducing sloshing in rectangular tanks partially filled with liquid [J]. Mechanics Research Communications, 2010, 37(3): 341–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen B. F., Wu C. H. Effects of excitation angle and coupled heave-surge-sway motion on fluid sloshing in a three-dimensional tank [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2011, 16(1): 22–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali Goudarzi M., Reza Sabbagh-Yazdi S. Investigation of nonlinear sloshing effects in seismically excited tanks [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 43: 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Song Y. K., Chang K. A., Ryu Y. et al. Experimental study on flow kinematics and impact pressure in liquid sloshing [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2013, 54(9): 1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cho I. H., Kim M. H. Effect of dual vertical porous baffles on sloshing reduction in a swaying rectangular tank [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2016, 126: 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Seo M. G., Kim Y., Park D. M. Effect of internal sloshing on added resistance of ship [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(1): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhuang Y., Wan D. Numerical study on ship motion fully coupled with LNG tank sloshing in CFD method [J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2019, 16(6): 1840022.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Stephen J. J., Sannasiraj S. A., Sundar V. Numerical modeling of nonlinear sloshing of liquid in a container coupled with barge subjected to regular excitation [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(5): 999–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X. S., Wang J. H., Wan D. C. Numerical techniques for coupling hydrodynamic problems in ship and ocean engineering [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(2): 212–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delorme L., Colagrossi A., Souto-Iglesias A. et al. A set of canonical problems in sloshing, Part I: Pressure field in forced roll-comparison between experimental results and SPH [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36(2): 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koh C. G., Luo M., Gao M. et al. Modelling of liquid sloshing with constrained floating baffle [J]. Computers and Structures, 2013, 122: 270–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen Z., Zong Z., Li H. T. et al. An investigation into the pressure on solid walls in 2D sloshing using SPH method [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 59: 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wen X., Wan D. Numerical simulation of three-layer-liquid sloshing by multiphase MPS method [C]. Proceedings of the ASME 2018 37th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, (OMAE2018), Madrid, Spain, 2018.

  18. Chen X., Zhang Y., Wan D. Numerical study of 3-D liquid sloshing in an elastic tank by MPS-FEM coupled method [J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 63(3): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Koshizuka S., Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid [J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123(3): 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang Y. X., Wan D. C., Hino T. Comparative study of MPS method and level-set method for sloshing flows [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(4): 577–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka M., Masunaga T. Stabilization and smoothing of pressure in MPS method by quasi-compressibility [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2010, 229(11): 4279–4290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X., Wan D. GPU accelerated MPS method for large-scale 3-D violent free surface flows [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 171: 677–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen X., Wan D. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional violent free surface flows by GPU-based MPS method [J]. International Journal of Computational Methods, 2019, 16(4): 1843012.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kang D. H., Lee Y. B. Summary report of sloshing model test for rectangular model [M]. Daewoo Ship Building and Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. (DSME), 2019.

  25. Xie F., Wan D. Comparison of liquid sloshing in different tanks based on MPS method [C]. The 10th International Conference on Computational Methods (ICCM2019), Singapore, 2019.

  26. Zhao W. W., Wang J. H., Wan D. C. Vortex identification methods in marine hydrodynamics [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(2): 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J. H., Zhao W. W., Wan D. C. Development of naoe-FOAM-SJTU solver based on OpenFOAM for marine hydrodynamics [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(1): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-cheng Wan.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51909160, 51879159), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2019YFB1704200, 2019YFC0312400), the Chang Jiang Scholars Program (Grant No. T2014099) and the Innovative Special Project of Numerical Tank of Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (Grant No. 2016-23/09).

Biography: Feng-ze Xie (1995-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xie, Fz., Zhao, Ww. & Wan, Dc. CFD simulations of three-dimensional violent sloshing flows in tanks based on MPS and GPU. J Hydrodyn 32, 672–683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0039-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0039-8

Key words

Navigation