Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated lifting line/surface panel method for optimal propeller design with consideration of hub effect

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An optimal marine propeller design method is proposed, which integrates the lifting line and surface panel method and is characterized by the use of the surface panel method to take the hub effect into consideration. By developing an integrated approach instead of an iterative method for the calculation of the interaction between the hub and the designed blades, the hub effects on the optimal circulation can be accounted for throughout the theoretical design procedure. This new integrated method provides a fast and accurate enough method to model the straight forward hub surface, in the optimal propeller design. A systematic design procedure from the basic design inputs to the blade geometry determination is performed and the designed propellers are validated by the surface panel method and the RANS method. The design and analysis cases are considered by different approaches with comparison and validation. And a comparative study including different hub geometries is also performed to reveal the mechanism of the hub effect on the distributions of the propeller optimal loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dang J., Dong G., Chen H. An exploratory study on the working principles of energy saving devices (ESDs): PIV, CFD investigations and ESD Design Guidelines [C]. ASME 2012, International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012, 1280–1287.

  2. Mewis F., Guiard T. Mewis Dust®-new developments, solutions and conclusions [C]. Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Humberg, German, 2011, 64–71.

  3. Shin H. J., Lee K. H., Han M. R. et al. Pre-swirl duct of fuel oil saving device design and analysis for ship [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 2013, 50(3): 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miao F., Huang G. Numerical research of circumferential arrangement of stators in pre-swirl duct [J]. Ship and Ocean Engineering, 2013, 42(5): 16–20(in Chinese).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim J. H., Choi J. E., Choi B. J. et al. Development of energy-saving devices for a full slow-speed ship through improving propulsion performance [J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2015, 7(2): 390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho H. N., Choi J. E., Chun H. H. Parametric designs of a pre-swirl duct for the 180 000DWT bulk carrier using CFD [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 2016, 53(5): 343–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ni B. Y., Huang G. F., Li P. C. et al. Design and application of high efficiency propeller integrated with HVAF for retrofit on a 20000 DWT bulk carrier [J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2016, 57(4): 34–43(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim H., Yang C. A new surface modification approach for CFD-based hull form optimization [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(5): 520–525.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang L., Huang F., Yang C. et al. Hydrodynamic optimization of a wedge hull [C]. Proceedings of the FAST2015, Washington DC, USA, 2015.

  10. Yang C., Huang F. An overview of simulation-based hydrodynamic design of ship hull forms [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(6): 947–960.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao F., Li S. Z., Yang L. et al. The ship hydrodynamic configurations design driven by a global flow optimization [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 32(4): 395–407(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang L., Li S. Z., Zhao F. et al. An integrated optimization design of a fishing ship hullform at different speeds [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(6): 1174–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vasudev K. L., Sharma R., Bhattacharyya S. K. Shape optimization of an AUV with ducted propeller using GA integrated with CFD [J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2018, 13(3): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaggero S., Villa D., Viviani M. An extensive analysis of numerical ship self-propulsion prediction via a coupled BEM/RANS approach [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2017, 66: 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sánchez-Caja A., Martio J., Siikonen T. A coupled potential–viscous flow approach for the prediction of propeller effective wakes in oblique flow [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2019, 24(3): 799–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vesting F., Bensow R. E. Propeller optimization considering cavitation and hull interaction [C]. Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Humberg, German, 2011, 79–88.

  17. Sun W. Y., Yang L., Wei J. F. et al. Powering performance orientated propeller optimization for large container ship with a coupling potential and RANS approach [C]. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Hydrodynamics, Incheon, Korea, 2018, 501–510.

  18. Epps B., Kimball R. Unified rotor lifting line theory [J]. Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 57(4): 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaggero S., Grassi D., Brizzolara S. From single to multi-stage marine propulsor: A fully numerical design approach [C]. Second International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Humberg, German, 2011, 409–419.

  20. Brizzolara S., Grassi D., Tincani E. Design of contrarotating propellers for high speed stern thrusters [J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2008, 2(1): 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Epps B. On the rotor lifting line wake model [J]. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 2017, 33(1): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang M. Hub effects in propeller design and analysis [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Cambridge, USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.

  23. Brizzolara S., Gaggero S., Grassi D. Hub effect in propeller design and analysis [C]. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 2013, 110–119.

  24. Sun W. Y., Huang G. F. Hub effect in propeller performance analysis and optimal design [J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2016, 57(1): 19–30(in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoshino T. Hydrodynamic analysis of propellers in steady flow using a surface panel method [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1989, 166: 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoshino T. Hydrodynamic analysis of propellers in steady flow using a surface panel method, 2nd report: Flow field around propeller [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1989, 166: 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Koyama K. Relation between the lifting surface theory and the lifting line theory in the design of an optimum screw propeller [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2013, 18(2): 145–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jessup S. D. An experimental investigation of viscous aspects of propeller blade flow [D]. Doctoral Thesis, Washington DC, USA: The Catholic University of America, 1989.

Download references

Acknowledgement

Thanks are due to Prof. Shi-tang Dong for his valuable guidance and discussion in this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-fu Huang.

Additional information

Project supported by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of China (Grant No. [2016]25).

Biography: Wen-yu Sun (1991-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Wy., Huang, Gf. Integrated lifting line/surface panel method for optimal propeller design with consideration of hub effect. J Hydrodyn 31, 1218–1230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0051-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-019-0051-z

Key words

Navigation