Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 368–378 | Cite as

Investigation of the stability and hydrodynamics of Tetrosomus gibbosus carapace in different pitch angles

  • Mahyar Malekidelarestaqi
  • Alireza RiasiEmail author
  • Hadi Moradi
  • Mohammad Samadpour


In this paper, stability properties of Tetrosomus gibbosus have been experimentally and numerically studied in pitching movements. This fish lives in southern offshores of Iran. Boxfishes usually live in extremely turbulent parts of seas and oceans, with high stability and maneuverability that has caught the attention of scientists. Their body shape let them swim with a quite rapid speed. Studies on Boxfishes have had influences on automotive and marine industries. The CAD file of the boxfish was created using optical CMM. Also a model was built and tested in a subsonic wind tunnel and a numerical study was conducted in virtual wind tunnel. The experimental results are consistent with the numerical ones and also support the findings of other studies on similar boxfishes. These results show that the flow around the fish, which is a consequence of its body shape, tries to maintain the stable position of the fish by resisting against the external force tilting the fish from its stable horizontal posture. The ventral and dorsal keels of the boxfish generate column-like vortices in horizontal direction which play an imperative role in maintaining the stability of the fish.

Key words

Boxfish Tetrosomus gibbosus humpback turretfish hydrodynamic stability experimental fluid mechanics bio-inspired engineering 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



We would like to thank Aref Vandadi, Hassan Nikpey, Mohammadreza DaqiqShirazi and Sina Meftah for their contribution to this research and their kindest helps and supports.


  1. [1]
    Blake R. W. On ostraciiform locomotion [J]. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 1977, 57(4): 1047–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Walker J. A. Does a rigid body limit maneuverability? [J]. J. Exp. Biol., 2000, 203(Pt 22): 3391–3396.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Gordon M. S., Hove J. R., Webb P. W. et al. Boxfishes as unusually well–controlled autonomous underwater vehicles [J]. Physiol. Biochem. Zool., 2000, 73(6): 663–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hove J. R. The biomechanics, energetics and hydrodynamics of ostraciiform locomotion [D]. University of California, 1999.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bartol I. K., Gharib M., Weihs D. et al. Hydrodynamic stability of swimming in ostraciid fishes: role of the carapace in the smooth trunkfish Lactophrys triqueter (Teleostei: Ostraciidae) [J]. J. Exp. Biol., 2003, 206(Pt 4): 725–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bartol I. K., Gharib M., Webb P. W. et al. Body–induced vortical flows: A common mechanism for self–corrective trimming control in boxfishes [J]. J. Exp. Biol., 2005, 208: 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Weihs D. Stability versus maneuverability in aquatic locomotion [J]. Integr. Comp. Biol., 2002, 42(1): 127–134.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Webb P. W. Buoyancy, Locomotion, and movement in fishes (Farrell F. P. Maneuverability) [M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 2011, 575–580.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Fish F. E., Lauder [J]. Passive and active flow control by swimming fishes and mammals [J]. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 2006, 38(1): 193–224.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Smith T. H. E., Caldwell G. S. Computational assessment of the fluid flow around coasting mature male blue sharks, prionace glauca (L.) [J]. J. Mar. Biol., 2009, 2009: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bartol I. K. et al. Flow patterns around the carapaces of rigid–bodied, multi–propulsor boxfishes (Teleostei: Ostraciidae) [J]. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 2002, 42(5): 971–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Bartol I. K., Gordon M. S., Webb P. et al. Evidence of self–correcting spiral flows in swimming boxfishes [J]. Bioinspir. Biomim., 2008, 3(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Deng X., Avadhanula S. Biomimetic micro underwater vehicle with oscillating fin propulsion: System design and force measurement [C]. Proc.–IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2005, 3312–3317.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kodati P., Deng X. Experimental studies on the hydrodynamics of a robotic ostraciiform tail fin [C]. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robot. Syst., 2006, 5418–5423.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kodati P., Deng X. Towards the body shape design of a hydrodynamically stable robotic boxfish [C]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006, 5412–5417.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kodati P., Hintle J., Deng X. Micro autnonomous robotic ostraciiform, design and fabrication [C]. Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, 2007, 10–14.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kodati P., Hinkle J., Winn A. et al. Microautonomous robotic ostraciiform (MARCO): Hydrodynamics, design, and fabrication [J]. IEEE Trans. Robot., 2008, 24(1): 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Kodati P., Deng X. Bio–inspired robotic fish with multiple fins (Inzartsev A. V. Underwater vehicles) [M]. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 2009, 97–109.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Hu Y. H., Zhao W., Xie G. M. et al. Development and target following of vision–based autonomous robotic fish [J]. Robotica, 2009, 27: 1075–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Pi L. Attitude control of a bio–inspired robotic fish with flexible pectoral fins [D]. University of Delaware, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Lachat D., Crespi A., Ijspeert A. J. BoxyBot: A swimming and crawling fish robot controlled by a central pattern generator [C]. Proc. First IEEE/RAS–EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatronics, 2006, 643–648.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Crespi A., Lachat D., Pasquier A. et al. Controlling swimming and crawling in a fish robot using a central pattern generator the fish robot BoxyBot [J]. Auton. Robots, 2008, 25(1–2): 1–10.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Wang W., Guo J., Wang Z. et al. Neural controller for swimming modes and gait transition on an ostraciiform fish robot [C]. 2013 IEEE/ASME Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatronics Mechatronics Hum. Wellbeing, AIM 2013, 2013, 1564–1569.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Wang W., Xie G. CPG–based locomotion controller design for a boxfish–like robot [J]. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst., 11(1): 2014.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Wang W., Xie G., Shi H. Dynamic modeling of an ostraciiform robotic fish based on angle of attack theory [C]. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, 2014, 3944–3949.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Deng H., Wang W., Luo W. et al. Yaw Angle Control of a Boxfish–like Robot Based on Cascade PID Control Algorithm [C]. 2015 6th International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA), 2015, 1–5.Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Wang W., Zhang X., Zhao J. et al. Sensing the neighboring robot by the artificial lateral line of a bio–inspired robotic fish [J]. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2015, 1565–1570.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Wang W., Li Y., Zhang X., Wang C. et al. Speed evaluation of a freely swimming robotic fish with an artificial lateral line [C]. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, 4737–4742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Hanlon M. The bionic car project, 2005. [Online]. Available: (Accessed: 24-Jul-2016).
  30. [30]
    Kozlov A., Chowdhury H., Mustary I. Bio–inspired design: aerodynamics of boxfish [J]. Procedia Eng., 2015, 105: 323–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Lawrence K. L. ANSYS workbench tutorial release 14 [M]. SDC publications, 2012.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Schlichting H., Truckenbrodt E. A. Aerodynamik des Flugzeuges [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1969.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahyar Malekidelarestaqi
    • 1
  • Alireza Riasi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hadi Moradi
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mohammad Samadpour
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Intelligent Systems Research InstituteSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.School of Electrics and Computer EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  4. 4.School of Mechanical EngineeringAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations