Advertisement

Journal of Hydrodynamics

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 106–113 | Cite as

SPH numerical investigation of the characteristics of an oscillating hydraulic jump at an abrupt drop

  • Diana De Padova
  • Michele Mossa
  • Stefano Sibilla
Special Column on SPHERIC2017 (Guest Editors Mou-bin Liu, Can Huang, A-man Zhang)

Abstract

This paper shows the results of the smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) modelling of the hydraulic jump at an abrupt drop, where the transition from supercritical to subcritical flow is characterised by several flow patterns depending upon the inflow and tailwater conditions. SPH simulations are obtained by a pseudo-compressible XSPH scheme with pressure smoothing; turbulent stresses are represented either by an algebraic mixing-length model, or by a two-equation k-ε model. The numerical model is applied to analyse the occurrence of oscillatory flow conditions between two different jump types characterised by quasi-periodic oscillation, and the results are compared with experiments performed at the hydraulics laboratory of Bari Technical University. The purpose of this paper is to obtain a deeper understanding of the physical features of a flow which is in general difficult to be reproduced numerically, owing to its unstable character: in particular, vorticity and turbulent kinetic energy fields, velocity, water depth and pressure spectra downstream of the jump, and velocity and pressure cross-correlations can be computed and analysed.

Keywords

Hydraulic jumps smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) models oscillating characteristics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Pagliara S. Transition from supercritical to subcritical flow at an abrupt drop [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1992, 30(3): 428–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Nebbia G. Su taluni fenomeni alternativi in correnti libere [J] L’Energia Elettrica, 1942, XIX(1): 1–10.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Abdel Ghafar A., Mossa M., Petrillo A. Scour from flow downstream of a sluice gate after a horizontal apron [C]. 6th International Symposium on River Sedimentation-Management of Sediment-Philosophy, Aims, and Techniques, New Delhi, India, 1995, 1069–1088.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Mossa M. On the oscillating characteristics of hydraulic jumps [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1999, 37(4): 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Wang H., Chanson H. Experimental study of turbulent fluctuations in hydraulic jumps [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2015, 141(7): 04015010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Mossa M., Petrillo A., Chanson H. Tailwater level effects on flow conditions at an abrupt drop [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2003, 41(1): 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dalrymple R. A., Rogers B. D. Numerical modelling of waves with the SPH method [J]. Coastal Engineering, 2006, 53(2-3): 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Capone T., Panizzo A., Monaghan J. J. SPH modelling of water waves generated by submarine landslides [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2010, 48(Suppl. 1): 80–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    De Padova D., Dalrymple R. A., Mossa M. Analysis of the artificial viscosity in the smoothed particle hydrodynamics modelling of regular waves [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2014, 52(6): 836–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Espa P., Sibilla S., Gallati M. SPH simulations of a vertical 2-D liquid jet introduced from the bottom of a free-surface rectangular tank [J]. Advances Application Fluid Mechanics, 2008, 3(2): 105–140.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. et al. 3D SPH modelling of hydraulic jump in a very large channel [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2013, 51(2): 158–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Jonsson P., Andreassona P., Hellström J. G. I. et al. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic simulation of hydraulic jump using periodic open boundaries [J]. Applied Mathatical Modelling, 2016, 40(19-20): 8391–8405.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. SPH modelling of hydraulic jump oscillations at an abrupt drop [J]. Water, 2017, 90: 790–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. SPH numerical investigation of characteristics of hydraulic jumps [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechahics, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9566-4.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. SPH numerical investigation of the velocity field and vorticity generation within a hydrofoil-induced spilling breaker [J]. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 16(1): 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Mossa M., Tolve U. Flow visualization in bubbly twophase hydraulic jump [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1998, 120(1): 160–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Mossa M. Discussion on “Relation of surface roller eddy formation and surface fluctuation in hydraulic jumps” by K. M. Mok [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2005, 43(5): 588–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Mossa M., Petrillo A., Chanson H. Discussion on the “Tailwater level effects on flow conditions at an abrupt drop” [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2004, 43(2): 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Mossa M. Experimental study of the flow field with spilling type breaking [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2008, 46(Suppl. 1): 81–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Liu G. R., Liu M. B. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: A meshfree particle methods [M]. Singapore: World Scientific, 2005.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Monaghan J. J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1992, 110(2): 399–406.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Sibilla S. An algorithm to improve consistency in smoothed particle hydrodynamics [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2015, 118: 148–158.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. Laboratory experiments and SPH modelling of hydraulic jumps [C]. Proceedings of the 4th SPHERIC Workshop, Nantes, France, 2009, 255–257.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    De Padova D., Mossa M., Sibilla S. et al. Hydraulic jump simulation by SPH [C]. Proceedings of the 5th SPHERIC Workshop, Manchester, UK, 2010, 50–55.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Launder B. E., Spalding D. B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2): 269–289.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Dehnen W., Aly H. Improving convergence in smoothed particle hydrodynamics simulations without pairing instability [J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2012, 425(2): 1068–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    De Padova D., Dalrymple R. A., Mossa M. et al. An analysis of SPH smoothing function modelling a regular breaking wave [C]. Proceedings of the National Conference XXXI Convegno Nazionale di Idraulica e Costruzioni Idrauliche, Perugia, Italy, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© China Ship Scientific Research Center 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana De Padova
    • 1
  • Michele Mossa
    • 1
  • Stefano Sibilla
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental Land, Building Engineering and ChemistryPolytechnic University of BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations