Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How do Cats Resist Landing Injury: Insights into the Multi-level Buffering Mechanism

Journal of Bionic Engineering volume 17, pages 600–610 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

When humans jump down from a high position, there is a risk of serious injury to the lower limbs. However, cats can jump down from the same heights without any injury because of their excellent ability to attenuate impact forces. The present study aims to investigate the macro/micro biomechanical features of paw pads and limb bones of cats, and the coordination control of joints during landing, providing insights into how cats protect themselves from landing injury. Accordingly, histological analysis, radiological analysis, finite element method, and mechanical testing were performed to investigate the mechanical properties, microstructure, and biomechanical response of the pads and limb bones. In addition, using a motion capture system, the kinematic/kinetic data during landing were analysed based on inverse dynamics. The results show that the pads and limb bones are major contributors to non-impact-injuries, and cats actively couple their joints to adjust the parameters of movement to dissipate the higher impact. Therefore, the paw pads, limb bones, and coordinated joints complement each other and constitute a multi-level buffering mechanism, providing the cat with the sophisticated shock absorption system. This biomechanical analysis can accordingly provide biological inspiration for new approaches to prevent human lower limb injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Vnuk D, Pirkić B, Matičić D, Radišić B, Stejskal M, Babić T, Kreszinger M, Lemo N. Feline high-rise syndrome: 119 cases (1998–2001). Journal of Feline Medicine & Surgery, 2004, 6, 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fontanella C G, Carniel E L, Frigo A, Macchi V, Natali A N. Investigation of biomechanical response of Hoffa’s fat pad and comparative characterization. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2017, 202, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fontanella C G, Nalesso F, Carniel E L, Natali A N. Biomechanical behavior of plantar fat pad in healthy and degenerative foot conditions. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2016, 54, 653–661.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mihai L A, Alayyash K, Goriely A. Paws, pads and plants: The enhanced elasticity of cell-filled load-bearing structures. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, 2015, 471, 20150107.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu X Q, Pei B Q, Pei Y Y, Hao Y, Zhou K Y, Wang W. Comprehensive biomechanism of impact resistance in the cat’s paw pad. BioMed Research International, 2019, 2019, 2183712.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chi K-J. Functional Morphology and Biomechanics of Mammalian Footpads. PhD thesis, ProQuest, Ann Arbor, USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pei B Q, Wang W, Dunne N, Li X M. Applications of carbon nanotubes in bone tissue regeneration and engineering: SuPeriority, concerns, current advancements, and prospects. Nanomaterials, 2019, 9, 1501.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li X M, Huang Y, Zheng L S, Liu H F, Niu X F, Huang J, Zhao F, Fan Y B. Effect of substrate stiffness on the functions of rat bone marrow and adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014, 102, 1092–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruimerman R, Huiskes R, Van Lenthe G, Janssen J. A computer-simulation model relating bone-cell metabolism to mechanical adaptation of trabecular architecture. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2001, 4, 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang S H, Yang X, Wang M. The role of body fluid shifts on hindlimb bone loss in tail suspended rats using a novel body fluid alteration device. Acta Astronautica, 2019, 159, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Metcalf L M, Dall’Ara E, Paggiosi M A. Validation of calcaneus trabecular microstructure measurements by HR-pQCT. Bone, 2018, 106, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Best A, Holt B, Troy K, Joseph H. Trabecular bone in the calcaneus of runners. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12, e0188200.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tsegai Z J, Skinner M M, Gee A H. Trabecular and cortical bone structure of the talus and distal tibia in Pan and Homo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2017, 163, 784–805.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meachen-Samuels J A, Blaire V V, Allen F A. Radiographs reveal exceptional forelimb strength in the sabertooth cat, smilodon fatalis. PLOS ONE, 2010, 5, e11412–.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Farrell B J, Bulgakova M A, Sirota M G. Accurate stepping on a narrow path: Mechanics, EMG and motor cortex activity in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 2015, 114, 2682–2702.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown N P, Bertocci G E, Cheffer K A. A three dimensional multiplane kinematic model for bilateral hind limb gait analysis in cats. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13, e0197837.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kane T R, Scher M P. A dynamical explanation of the falling cat phenomenon. International Journal of Solids & Structures, 1969, 5, 663–666.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Z Q, Yu H, Yang J L, Wang L L, Yang L M. How cat lands: Insights into contribution of the forelimbs and hindlimbs to attenuating impact force. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59, 3325–3332.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mckinley P A, Smith J L. Visual and vestibular contributions to prelanding EMG during jump-downs in cats. Experimental Brain Research, 1983, 52, 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leyva-Mendivil M F, Page A, Bressloff N W, Limbert G. A mechanistic insight into the mechanical role of the stratum corneum during stretching and compression of the skin. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2015, 49, 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sims A M, Stait-Gardner T, Fong L, Morley J W, Price W S, Hoffman M, Simmons A, Schindhelm K. Elastic and viscoelastic properties of porcine subdermal fat using MRI and inverse FEA. Biomechanics & Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2010, 9, 703–711.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sun L W, Fan Y B, Li D Y, Zhao F, Xie T, Yang X, Gu Z T. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of rat bone under simulated microgravity using nanoindentation. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5, 3506–3511.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu X Q, Pei B Q, Pei Y Y, Wu N, Zhou K Y, Hao Y, Wang W. Contributions of limb joints to energy absorption during landing in cats. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 2019, 2019, 3815612.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoy M G, Zernicke R F. Modulation of limb dynamics in the swing phase of locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1985, 18, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miao H B, Fu J, Qian Z H, Ren L Q, Ren L. How does paw pad of canine attenuate ground impacts? A multi-layer cushion system. Biology Open, 2017, 6, 1889–1896.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qian Z H, Ren L, Ren L Q. A coupling analysis of the biomechanical functions of human foot complex during locomotion. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S150–S157.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hubbard C, Naples V, Ross E, Carlon B. Comparative analysis of paw pad structure in the clouded leopard (Neofelis nebulosa) and domestic cat (Felis catus). Anatomical Record, 2010, 292, 1213–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weissengruber G, Egger G, Hutchinson J, Groenewald H B, Elsässer L, Famini D, Forstenpointner G. The structure of the cushions in the feet of African elephants (Loxodonta africana). Journal of Anatomy, 2006, 209, 781–792.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer W, Bartels T, Tsukise A, Neurand K. Histochemical aspects of stratum corneum function in the feline foot pad. Archives of Dermatological Research, 1990, 281, 541–543

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ker R F. The design of soft collagenous load-bearing tissues. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1999, 202, 3315–3324.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yamashita M, Gotoh M. Impact behavior of honeycomb structures with various cell specifications-numerical simulation and experiment. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 32, 618–630.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Burlayenko V, Sadowski T. Effective elastic properties of foam-filled honeycomb cores of sandwich panels. Composite Structures, 2010, 92, 2890–2900.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ciarelli M, Goldstein S, Kuhn J, Cody D, Brown M. Evaluation of orthogonal mechanical properties and density of human trabecular bone from the major metaphyseal regions with materials testing and computed tomography. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991, 9, 674–682.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dalén N, Hellström L-G, Jacobson B. Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 1976, 47, 503–508.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wang L Z, Zhang H Q, Fan Y B. Comparative study of the mechanical properties, micro-structure, and composition of the cranial and beak bones of the great spotted woodpecker and the lark bird. Science China Life Sciences, 2011, 54, 1036–1041.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L Z, Niu X F, Ni Y K, Xu P, Liu X Y, Lu S, Zhang M, Fan Y B. Effect of microstructure of spongy bone in different parts of woodpecker’s skull on resistance to impact injury. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2013, 2013, 924564.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Perilli E, Baleani M, Öhman C, Baruffaldi F, Viceconti M. Structural parameters and mechanical strength of cancellous bone in the femoral head in osteoarthritis do not depend on age. Bone, 2007, 41, 760–768.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Z Q, Yang J L, Yu H. Effect of flexible back on Energy absorption during landing in cats: A biomechanical investigation. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2014, 11, 506–516.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Müller R, Andrada E. Skipping on uneven ground: Trailing leg adjustments simplify control and enhance robustness. Royal Society Open Science, 2018, 5, 172114.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Miller S, Van Der Burg J, Van Der Meche F. Coordination of movements of the hindlimbs and forelimbs in different forms of locomotion in normal and decerebrate cats. Brain Research, 1975, 91, 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Betts B, Smith J L, Edgerton R, Collatos T C. Telemetered EMG of fast and slow muscles in cats. Brain research, 1976, 117, 529–533.

    Google Scholar 

  42. McKinley P, Smith J, Gregor R. Responses of elbow extensors to landing forces during jump downs in cats. Experimental Brain Research, 1983, 49, 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  43. English A W. An electromyographic analysis of forelimb muscles during overground stepping in the cat. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1978, 76, 105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Konow N, Azizi E, Roberts T J. Muscle power attenuation by tendon during energy dissipation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2011, 279, 1108–1113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work is financially supported by the Defense Industrial Technology Development Program under the Grant JCKY2018601B106 and JCKY2017205B032.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xueqing Wu, Baoqing Pei, Wei Wang, Yan Hao & Kaiyuan Zhou

  2. Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Xueqing Wu, Baoqing Pei, Wei Wang, Yan Hao & Kaiyuan Zhou

  3. School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, China

    Yuyang Pei

Authors
  1. Xueqing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Baoqing Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuyang Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yan Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kaiyuan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoqing Pei.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary material, approximately 5.63 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 3.57 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 3.61 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 5.41 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 3.21 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 5.04 MB.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, X., Pei, B., Pei, Y. et al. How do Cats Resist Landing Injury: Insights into the Multi-level Buffering Mechanism. J Bionic Eng 17, 600–610 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0048-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-020-0048-x

Keywords

search

Navigation