Gravitation-enabled Forward Acceleration during Flap-bounding Flight in Birds
Flap-bounding, a form of intermittent flight, is often exhibited by small birds over their entire range of flight speeds. Its purpose is unclear during low to medium speed (2 m·s−1–8 m·s−1) flight: aerodynamic models suggest continuous flapping would require less power output and lower cost of transport. To explore its functional significance at low speeds, we measured body trajectory and kinematics of wings and tail of two zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) during flights between two perches in a laboratory. The flights consisted of three phases: initial, descending and ascending. Zebra finch first accelerated using continuous flapping, then descended, featuring intermittent bounds. The flight was completed by ascending using nearly-continuous flapping. When exiting bounds in descending phase, they achieved higher velocity than that of pre-bound forward by swinging their body forward similar to pendular motion with conserved mechanical energy. We recorded takeoffs of three black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) in the wild and also found similar kinematics. Our modeling of power output indicated finch achieved higher velocity (13%) with lower cost of transport (9%) when descending, compared with continuous flapping in previously studied pigeons. Flap-bounding could be useful for unmanned aerial vehicle design by mimicking descending flight to achieve rapid take-off and transition to forward flight.
Keywordszebra finch intermittent flight aerodynamics power unmanned aerial vehicle
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
All procedures involving the animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Montana. We thank Anne Davis for assistance with preliminary research that motivated the present study and Mathew Gutierrez and Gaëlle Lefeuvre for assistance with video recording indoors and outdoors, respectively. Supported by NSF CMMI 1234747.
- Tobalske B W. Morphology, velocity, and intermittent flight in birds. American Zoologist, 2001, 41, 177–187.Google Scholar
- Csicsáky M J. Body-gliding in the zebra finch. Fortschritte der Zoologie, 1977, 24, 275–286.Google Scholar
- Rayner J M V, Viscardi P W, Ward S, Speakman J R. Aerodynamics and energetics of intermittent flight in birds. American Zoologist, 2001, 41, 188–204.Google Scholar
- Lighthill M J. Introduction to the scaling of aerial locomotion. In: Scale Effects in Animal Locomotion, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1977, 365–404.Google Scholar
- Alexander R McN. Optima for Animals, Arnold, London, UK, 1982.Google Scholar
- DeJong M J. Bounding Flight in Birds, Ph.D dissertation, University of Wisconsin, USA, 1983.Google Scholar
- Pennycuick C J. Modelling the Flying Bird, 1st ed., Academic Press, New York, USA, 2008.Google Scholar
- Tobalske B W, Peacock W L, Dial K P. Kinematics of flap-bounding flight in the zebra finch over a wide range of speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1999, 202, 1725–1739.Google Scholar
- Dunning J B. CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992.Google Scholar
- Johnson W. Helicopter Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA, 1980.Google Scholar
- Askew G N, Marsh R L, Ellington C P. The mechanical power output of the flight muscles of blue-breasted quail during take-off. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2001, 204, 3601–3619.Google Scholar
- Keennon M, Klingebiel K, Won H, Andriukov A. Development of the nano hummingbird: A tailless flapping wing micro air vehicle. Proceedings of the 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Nashville, USA, 2012.Google Scholar