Journal of Bionic Engineering

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 481–493 | Cite as

Coupling Effect of Morphology and Mechanical Properties Contributes to the Tribological Behaviors of Snake Scales

  • Long Zheng
  • Yinghui Zhong
  • Yihang Gao
  • Jiayi Li
  • Zhihui Zhang
  • Zhenning Liu
  • Luquan Ren
Article

Abstract

It is known that the tribological behaviors of snake skins are contributed by the synergistic action of multiple factors, such as surface morphology and mechanical properties, which has inspired fabrication of scale-like surface textures in recent years. However, the coupling effect and mechanism remain to be elucidated. In this work, the morphology and mechanical properties of the scales from different body sections (leading body half, middle trunk and tailing body half) and positions (dorsal, lateral and ventral) of Boa constrictor and Eryx tataricus were characterized and compared to investigate the corresponding effects on the tribological behaviors and to probe the possible coupling mechanism. The morphological characterizations of scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy revealed significant differences between the two species that the scales from Boa constrictor are rougher in general. The mechanical properties measured by nanoindentation corroboratively demonstrated substantial differences in elastic modulus and hardness. Interestingly, the ventral scales with lower surface roughness, together with relatively larger elastic modulus and hardness, manifest higher friction coefficients. A “double-crossed” hypothesis was proposed to explain the observed coupling effect of morphology and mechanical properties on friction, which may afford valuable insights for the design of bionic surface with desirable tribological performance.

Keywords

bionics coupling effect friction coefficient morphology mechanical properties snake scales 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51375204 and U1601203), Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department (20140101056JC), and Province Joint Fund (SXGJSF2017-2-4 and SXGJQY2017-1) and JLUSTIRT Program of Jilin University.

References

  1. [1]
    Ball P. Engineering shark skin and other solutions. Nature, 1999, 400, 507–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Meyers M A, Chen P-Y, Lin A Y-M, Seki Y. Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties. Progress in Materials Science, 2008, 53, 1–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wong T-S, Kang S H, Tang S K Y, Smythe E J, Hatton B D, Grinthal A, Aizenberg J. Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature, 2011, 477, 443–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Huang H, Zhang Y, Ren L Q. Particle Erosion resistance of bionic samples inspired from skin structure of desert lizard, Laudakin stoliczkana. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2012, 9, 465–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Comanns P, Winands K, Pothen M, Bott R A, Wagner H, Baumgartner W. The Texas horned lizard as model for robust capillary structures for passive directional transport of cooling lubricants. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 2016, 979711, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2218873. Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Evans S E. At the feet of the dinosaurs: The early history and radiation of lizards. Biological Reviews, 2003, 78, 513–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Klein M-C G, Gorb S N. Ultrastructure and wear patterns of the ventral epidermis of four snake species (Squamata, Serpentes). Zoology, 2014, 117, 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Abdel-Aal H A, Vargiolu R, Zahouani H, El Mansori M. Preliminary investigation of the frictional response of reptilian shed skin. Wear, 2012, 290-291, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Hazel J, Stone M, Grace M S, Tsukruk V V. Nanoscale design of snake skin for reptation locomotions via friction anisotropy. Journal of Biomechanics, 1999, 32, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R. From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003, 100, 10603–10606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Rechenberg I. Tribological characteristics of sandfish. Nature as Engineer and Teacher: Learning for Technology from Biological Systems, 2003, 8–11.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Rocha-Barbosa O, Moraes e Silva R. Analysis of the microstructure of Xenodontinae snake scales associated with different habitat occupation strategies. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 2009, 69, 919–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Berthé R, Westhoff G, Bleckmann H, Gorb S. Surface structure and frictional properties of the skin of the Amazon tree boa Corallus hortulanus (Squamata, Boidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2009, 195, 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Klein M-C G, Deuschle J K, Gorb S N. Material properties of the skin of the Kenyan sand boa Gongylophis colubrinus (Squamata, Boidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2010, 196, 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Benz M J, Kovalev A E, Gorb S N. Anisotropic frictional properties in snakes. SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, 2012, 83390X, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.916972. Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Klein M-C G, Gorb S N. Epidermis architecture and material properties of the skin of four snake species. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2012, 9, 3140–3155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Marvi H, Hu D L. Friction enhancement in concertina locomotion of snakes. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2012, 9, 3067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Abdel-Aal H, El Mansori M. Reptilian Skin as a Biomimetic Analogue for the Design of Deterministic Tribosurfaces, Springer, 2011. (in Germany)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Abdel-Aal H A, El Mansori M. Tribological analysis of the ventral scale structure in a Python regius in relation to laser textured surfaces. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 2013, 1, 015001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Baum M J, Heepe L, Fadeeva E, Gorb S N. Dry friction of microstructured polymer surfaces inspired by snake skin. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2014, 5, 1091–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Baum M J, Heepe L, Gorb S N. Friction behavior of a microstructured polymer surface inspired by snake skin. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 2014, 5, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Greiner C, Schäfer M. Bio-inspired scale-like surface textures and their tribological properties. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2015, 10, 044001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Mühlberger M, Rohn M, Danzberger J, Sonntag E, Rank A, Schumm L, Kirchner R, Forsich C, Gorb S, Einwögerer B. UV-NIL fabricated bio-inspired inlays for injection molding to influence the friction behavior of ceramic surfaces. Microelectronic Engineering, 2015, 141, 140–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Cuervo P, López D, Cano J, Sánchez J, Rudas S, Estupiñán H, Toro A, Abdel-Aal H. Development of low friction snake-inspired deterministic textured surfaces. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 2016, 4, 024013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Ren L. Progress in the bionic study on anti-adhesion and resistance reduction of terrain machines. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52, 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Zheng L, Wu J, Zhang S, Sun S, Zhang Z, Liang S, Liu Z, Ren L. Bionic coupling of hardness gradient to surface texture for improved anti-wear properties. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 406–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Stidworthy J. Snakes of the World, Grosset & Dunlap Inc., USA, 1974.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Mehrtens J M. Living Snakes of the World in Color, Sterling Pub Co Inc, USA, 1987.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Wallach V, Williams K L, Boundy J. Snakes of the world: A catalogue of living and extinct species, CRC Press, USA, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Hisham A. On surface structure and friction regulation in reptilian limbless locomotion. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2013, 22, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Abdel-Aal H, El Mansori M, Mezghani S. Multi-scale investigation of surface topography of ball python (Python regius) shed skin in comparison to human skin. Tribology Letters, 2010, 37, 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Abdel-Aal H A. Functional surfaces for tribological applications: inspiration and design. Surface Topography: Metrology and Properties, 2016, 4, 043001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Klein M-C G, Gorb S N. Scratch resistance of the ventral skin surface in four snake species (Squamata, Serpentes). Zoology, 2016, 119, 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Voigt D, Schweikart A, Fery A, Gorb S. Leaf beetle attachment on wrinkles: Isotropic friction on anisotropic surfaces. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 215, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Baum M J, Kovalev A E, Michels J, Gorb S N. Anisotropic friction of the ventral scales in the snake Lampropeltis getula californiae. Tribology Letters, 2014, 54, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Hutchings I M. Strain rate effects in microparticle impact. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 1977, 10, L179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Carter G, Nobes M J, Arshak K I. The mechanism of ripple generation on sandblasted ductile solids. Wear, 1980, 65, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Ren L Q, Li J Q, Tong J, Chen B C. Bionic nonsmoothness and its applications. Proceedings of the 6th Asia-Pacific Conference of ISTVS, Shanghai, China, 2000, 351–358.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    Tong J, Ma Y H, Ren L Q, Li J Q. Tribological characteristics of pangolin scales in dry sliding. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 2000, 19, 569–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Sun J-R, Hong C, Qian C, Li J-Q, Chen B C, Ren L Q. Bionic study on the dung beetle Copris ochus Motschulsky for reduction of soil adhesion. Acta Biophysica Sinica, 2001, 17, 785–793.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    Ren L Q, Liang Y H. Generation mechanism of biological coupling. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2011, 41, 1348–1357. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    Ronen A, Etsion I, Kligerman Y. Friction-reducing surface- texturing in reciprocating automotive components. Tribology Transactions, 2001, 44, 359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Scaraggi M, Mezzapesa F P, Carbone G, Ancona A, Sorgente D, Lugarà P M. Minimize friction of lubricated lasermicrotextured- surfaces by tuning microholes depth. Tribology International, 2014, 75, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Hu D L, Nirody J, Scott T, Shelley M J. The mechanics of slithering locomotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009, 106, 10081–10085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Alexander R M. Principles of Animal Locomotion, Princeton University Press, USA, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jilin University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Long Zheng
    • 1
  • Yinghui Zhong
    • 1
  • Yihang Gao
    • 1
  • Jiayi Li
    • 1
  • Zhihui Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhenning Liu
    • 1
  • Luquan Ren
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering (Ministry of Education), College of Biological and Agricultural EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations