Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eine Analyse der methodischen Qualität von Akupunkturstudien der letzten 50 Jahre

The methodological quality of acupuncture studies: An analysis over the past 50 years

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Deutsche Zeitschrift für Akupunktur Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 17 December 2020

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

Literatur

  1. MacPherson H, Altman DG, Hammerschlag R, Youping L, Taixiang W, White A et al (2010) Revised standards for reporting interventions in clinical trials of acupuncture (STRICTA): extending the CONSORT statement. PLoS Med 7(6):e1000261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000261

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (Hrsg) (2019) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Zugegriffen: 3. Okt. 2020

  3. Hou T, Zheng Q, Feng X, Wang L, Liu Y, Li Y (2020) Methodology and reporting quality evaluation of acupuncture for mild cognitive impairment: an overview of systematic reviews. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7908067

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Luo S, Long Y, Xiao W et al (2020) Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta-epidemiology study [published correction appears in J Evid Based Med. 2020 Aug;13(3):249. J Evid Based Med 13(1):25–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haller H, Lauche R, Sundberg T, Dobos G, Cramer H (2019) Craniosacral therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3017-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Naturheilkunde und Integrative Medizin, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Am Deimelsberg 34 a, 45276, Essen, Deutschland

    Heidemarie Haller

Authors
  1. Heidemarie Haller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidemarie Haller.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

H. Haller gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

In der Online-Version des ursprünglich publizierten Artikels wurde der englische Beitragstitel falsch ausgespielt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haller, H. Eine Analyse der methodischen Qualität von Akupunkturstudien der letzten 50 Jahre. Dtsch Z Akupunkt 64, 26–28 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42212-020-00319-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42212-020-00319-8

Search

Navigation