# Effects of Cell Microtopology on the In-plane Dynamic Crushing Analysis of Re-entrant Square Cellular Material

- 160 Downloads

## Abstract

With the development of three-dimensional printing technologies, so-called cellular materials have achieved increasing attention due to outstanding properties. Unlike pure solid structures, properties of cellular materials are influenced by both utilized material and cell microtopology. The present paper proposes a novel type of re-entrant square cellular material. To explore the relationship between microtopology and macrodynamic responses systematically, an explicit dynamic finite element simulation method is used. This work starts by constructing theoretical models of relative density employing a two-dimensional unit cell. Then, the effects of geometric features and configurations on dynamic properties are explored, and simulations indicate that variations of geometric parameters strongly affect properties and that the staggered re-entrant squares are more stable than the regular re-entrant squares. Subsequently, the effects of the impact velocity on dynamic crushing behaviors are elaborated. On this basis, the relationship of unit mass energy absorption and geometric features is obtained by employing the response surface method. Furthermore, with targets of maximum unit mass energy absorption and minimum relative density, the optimal structural parameters are achieved by using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. The study provides a detailed introduction to dynamic behaviors of cellular materials and guidance to design new structures with superior characteristics of energy absorption.

## Keywords

Re-entrant cellular material Dynamic crushing Microtopology In-plane Finite element analysis## 1 Introduction

With the evolution of nature, architected cellular materials are equipped with low density, high stiffness and high strength. The beaks and bones of birds, for example, contain highly porous, cellular core [1]. Owing to their desirable energy absorption capacity and mechanical properties, architected cellular materials have been intensively applied in the domains of vehicle, chemistry, electrical engineering, architecture, and bio-mechanics [2, 3, 4].

Unlike pure solid structures, both utilized material and cell topology dominate the mechanical properties of cellular material. Among this, cell topology consists of relative density, cell size,etc [5, 6, 7, 8]. It has been research hotspots to set up relationship of cell topology and performance and realize the redesign based on practical applications [9].

Previous work has investigated the crushing behaviors of cellular materials with various cell microtopology. In a complementary study, Fleck et al. [10, 11] illustrated that the performance of sandwich panels attribute greatly to the topology and relative density. The study on the in-plane mechanical properties of honeycomb structures were conducted, various cell types were taken into account and initial yield surfaces were obtained by Wang et al. [12, 13]. In order to investigate the impact behaviors of honeycombs, experiments and numerical simulations are conducted by Papka and Kyriakides [14, 15]. Liu and Zhang [5] discussed honeycomb structures filled with equilateral triangular or quadratic cells with regular and staggered arrangements in terms of impact velocity and structural parameters.

The aforementioned pioneering work mainly paid attention to convex cells and gave less attention to concave cells, let alone the dynamic crushing analysis of re-entrant cellular materials. The present study proposes a novel re-entrant square cellular material. To explore the relationship between microtopology and macrodynamic responses, the effects of cell microtopology on in-plane dynamic crushing are analyzed with the adoption of finite element method. Most importantly, research on three dimensions can be carried out based on the concept of two dimensions.

## 2 Theoretical Models of Relative Density for Regular Re-entrant Squares and Staggered Re-entrant Squares

The present paper puts forward three geometrical parameters, namely the cell wall thickness *t*, re-entrant distance *h* and cell edge length *L*, as exhibited in Fig. 1.

Design matrix of re-entrant squares for crushing analysis

| \(v/(\hbox {m/s})\) | \(\alpha \) | \(\beta \) | | \(v/(\hbox {m/s})\) | \(\alpha \) | \(\beta \) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

1 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 9 | 10 | 0.2 | 0.05 |

2 | 5 | 0.1 | 0.15 | 10 | 5 | 0.15 | 0.1 |

3 | 20 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 11 | 50 | 0.1 | 0.15 |

4 | 50 | 0.15 | 0.1 | 12 | 20 | 0.2 | 0.2 |

5 | 5 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 13 | 50 | 0.05 | 0.2 |

6 | 10 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 14 | 20 | 0.15 | 0.1 |

7 | 20 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 15 | 5 | 0.05 | 0.05 |

8 | 50 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 16 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.15 |

## 3 Effects of Micro-arrangements on Dynamic Crushing Behaviors

### 3.1 Computational Models

To investigate the in-plane dynamic impact characteristics of the re-entrant material, Fig. 4 presents finite element models of the RRS and SRS. For the RRS, there are \(N_R =5 \times 5\) cells. For the SRS, there are five layers, with odd-numbered layers having six cells and even-numbered layers having five cells. The re-entrant cellular material is made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene with density \(\rho =1.05 \hbox {g/cm}^{3}\), Young’s modulus \(E=1\) GPa, Poisson’s ratio \(\nu =0.39\), and yield strength \(\sigma _\mathrm{y} =26.75\) MPa. The nonlinear explicit finite element code Ls-dyna is employed in the calculation. A rigid plate moving at constant velocity is used to impact the material, and the re-entrant cellular material is clamped at its bottom surface and having both sides free. Adjacent nodes between cells are bonded using equivalence.

As shown in Fig. 4, the material has thickness of 1 mm and is meshed with tetrahedron elements. Single self-contact is set in the cellular material to guarantee in-plane deformation, neglecting out-plane deformation during impact process. Besides, the friction coefficient between the surfaces of rigid plate and the specimen are set as 0.

### 3.2 Numerical Simulation Analyses

*X*axis stands for nominal strain, and

*Y*axis demotes nominal stress.

The local dynamic process is as follows. Fig. 6a presents the rotating phenomenon beyond the elastic stage for the third group of variables, which results in stress \(\sigma _3 \) not increasing with strain but reaching a plateau. In Fig. 6b, the thickness coefficient \(\alpha \) of the seventh group is smaller than that of the third group. There is thus a rotating phenomenon, the stress reaches a plateau, the rotation occurs earlier than that of the third group, and \(\sigma _7 <\sigma _3 \) eventually. Figure 6c shows that deformation characteristics of the 12th group are similar to those of the 14th group in that there is no obvious rotation. Stress \(\sigma _{12} \) is the highest because of the highest thickness coefficient \(\alpha \) and re-entrant coefficient \(\beta \) with the result that \(\sigma _{12} >\sigma _{14} \). The above therefore explains the relations between geometric parameters and stress \(\sigma \) for the RRS comprehensively; i.e., increases in the thickness coefficient \(\alpha \) and re-entrant coefficient \(\beta \) increase stress \(\sigma \).

For the SRS, it is clearly seen that the order of stress values is the same as that for the RRS, \(\sigma _{12}>\sigma _{14}>\sigma _3 >\sigma _7 \). The corresponding stress–strain curves and the local dynamic process shown in Fig. 7a–d reveal that the stress \(\sigma \) attributes to the starting time of rotation. As the rotation commences, the SRS starts to enter the plateau region, and it is concluded that the rotation starting time of the third group is later than that of the seventh group, which is earlier than that of the 14th group, and that of the 12th group is later than that of the 14th group. The four groups of variables have the same impact velocity and various geometric parameters, and varying the geometric parameters thus greatly affects the starting time of rotation. Changes in geometric parameters therefore affect stress \(\sigma \), and it is concluded that stress \(\sigma \) increases with re-entrant coefficient \(\beta \) and decreases with increasing thickness coefficient \(\alpha \).

Figure 8 shows the stress–strain curves obtained for the two cell arrangements. Table 2 shows the plateau stress and unit mass energy absorption of the RRS and SRS.

It is concluded that the staggered arrangement has higher plateau stress and unit mass energy absorption, which is dominated by the stress and the length of the plateau, than the regular arrangement. According to the evaluation criterion that the plateau region should have higher platform stress, the staggered arrangement has outstanding advantages over the regular arrangement. This is explained as follows. For both regular and staggered arrangements, there is a rotation phenomenon in the process of deformation, with the rotation center being exactly the center of the unit cell. The SRS comprises cells shifted a half-cellular beam length toward the center relative to the RRS. Owing to different contact patterns, point-to-point contact for the regular arrangement and edge-to-edge contact for the staggered arrangement, the arm of the force for the staggered arrangement is smaller than that for the regular arrangement. The SRS therefore needs a much larger external force than the RRS for the same deformation. The SRS is thus more stable than the RRS.

## 4 Effects of Impact Velocity on Dynamic Crushing Behaviors

The impact velocity is known to affect the dynamic crushing behaviors of a material. This paper only considers the commonly used impact velocities of automobiles of 5, 20, and 50 m/s. To fully determine the effects of the impact velocity on dynamic crushing behaviors, four groups of sampling points are selected for the two cell arrangement patterns as shown in Table 3.

Simulation analysis provides the corresponding stress–strain curves as shown in Fig. 9.

It is clearly seen that varying the impact velocity does not appreciably affect the stress–strain relation for each group with the same geometric parameters. This is explained in the following.

The impact velocity affects the dynamic response. Meanwhile, the dynamic responses of cellular materials are divided into three regions according to the impact velocity (with *V* indicating the initial impact velocity of the rigid plate). In the first region, \(V_{\mathrm{s}}>V_{\mathrm{w}} >V\) and the deformation is quasi-static. In the third region, \(V\ge V_{\mathrm{s}} \ge V_{\mathrm{w}} \) and the dynamic response area propagates the stable shock wave. In the second region, \(V_{\mathrm{s}}>V>V_{\mathrm{w}} \) and the dynamic response lies between quasi-static deformation and the static shock wave response [21, 22].

Plateau stress and unit mass energy absorption of regular and staggered arrangements

| Plateau stress/Pa (regular) | Plateau stress/Pa (staggered) | Unit mass energy absorption/(J/kg) (regular) | Unit mass energy absorption/(J/kg) (staggered) |
---|---|---|---|---|

3 | 6.5 \(\times \,10^{7}\) | 7.5 \(\times \,10^{7}\) | 1.18 \(\times \,10^{10}\) | 1.2 \(\times \,10^{10}\) |

7 | 4.6 \(\times \,10^{7}\) | 5 \(\times \,10^{7}\) | 4.8 \(\times \,10^{10}\) | 4.9 \(\times \,10^{10}\) |

12 | 1.2 \(\times \,10^{8}\) | 8.8 \(\times \,10^{8}\) | 1.2 \(\times \,10^{10}\) | 6.1 \(\times \,10^{10}\) |

14 | 8 \(\times \,10^{7}\) | 4.6 \(\times \,10^{8}\) | 1.7 \(\times \,10^{10}\) | 3.9 \(\times \,10^{10}\) |

Four groups of sampling points selected for the two cell arrangements

| Impact velocity/(m/s) | | Impact velocity/(m/s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Regular | 2 | 5 | 10 | 5 |

11 | 50 | 14 | 20 | |

Staggered | 2 | 5 | 10 | 5 |

11 | 50 | 14 | 20 |

## 5 Multi-objective Optimization

### 5.1 Approximate Models of the Re-entrant Squares

Approximate modeling is a method of approaching a set of design variables and response variables by establishing mathematical models based on sampling data selected in the design space. The response surface method (RSM) is a kind of approximate modeling method, which fits a response surface to simulate a real limit state surface through a series of deterministic “tests” [25]. The response surface model is usually of order 1–4. The higher the order is, the greater the fitting ability of the nonlinear model. The *F* test and \(R^{2}\) test are usually conducted to determine the construction precision of the response surface. The proximity of \(R^{2}\) to 1 is considered in the \(R^{2}\) test. The closer \(R^{2}\) is to 1, the more accurate the approximate model remains. Meanwhile, the approximate model approaches higher accuracy as the sum of squares for error (SSE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE) decrease. According to the selected sampling points in Table 1, the accuracy of the response surface models for the re-entrant structures with the two cell arrangements are presented in Table 4.

*W*is obtained according to the response surface function.

Accuracy of the response surface models for the re-entrant squares with the two cell arrangements

The highest power of fitting formula | The regular | The staggered | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

\(R^{2}\) | SSE | RMSE | \(R^{2}\) | SSE | RMSE | |

1st | 0.8700 | 1.8219 \(\times \,10^{8}\) | 3374.4 | 0.9405 | 1.5444 \(\times \,10^{8}\) | 3106.8 |

2nd | 0.9991 | 1.24509 \(\times \,10^{5}\) | 27.89 | 0.9977 | 5.8643 \(\times \,10^{5}\) | 191.4 |

3rd | 0.9866 | 1.8726 \(\times \,10^{6}\) | 342.1 | 0.9892 | 1.8452 \(\times \,10^{6}\) | 339.6 |

4th | 0.9883 | 1.6244 \(\times \,10^{6}\) | 318.6 | 0.9845 | 2.6736 \(\times \,10^{6}\) | 408.8 |

### 5.2 Optimization of the SRS

As previously mentioned, the SRS has greater plateau stress and unit mass energy absorption than the RRS. Hence, in what follows, multi-objective optimization is performed for the SRS.

This work adopts a genetic algorithm, which is a kind of randomized search algorithm based on biological natural selection and a natural genetic mechanism. Genetic algorithm encodes the spaces of a problem; i.e., the problem space is mapped to the search space [26]. Selection, crossover, and mutation then occur with certain probability, producing individuals with high average fitness in each generation reserved. Finally, the individual with maximum fitness is obtained through gradual iterations and the purpose of optimization is achieved.

#### 5.2.1 Optimization of Maximizing the Unit Mass Energy Absorption

#### 5.2.2 Optimization of Minimizing the Relative Density

Structural lightness is important in design and manufacturing. As promising materials having a wide range of uses, re-entrant cellular materials with better performance and lower mass will be more competitive.

Optimal results of single-objective optimization and multi-objective optimization

Single-objective optimization | Multi-objective optimization | |||
---|---|---|---|---|

Maximum unit mass energy absorption | Minimum relative density | \(\omega _1 =0.4\) | \(\omega _2 =0.6\) | |

\(\omega _1 =0.6\) | \(\omega _2 =0.4\) | |||

\(\rho _{\mathrm{staggered}} \) | 0.934 | 0.167 | 0.769 | 0.324 |

\(W_{\mathrm{staggered}}/(\hbox {J/kg})\) | 3.54 \(\times \,10^{11}\) | 1.41 \(\times \,10^{10}\) | 2.42 \(\times \,10^{11}\) | 1.13 \(\times \,10^{11}\) |

#### 5.2.3 Multi-objective Optimization Design of SRS

*Q*, also called the satisfaction function and given by the following equation, is put forward herein to seek an optimal solution. According to the definition of the satisfaction function, the solution improves as the satisfaction decreases:

Through the above optimization process, optimal results of single-objective optimization and multi-objective optimization are acquired, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5 shows that the unit mass energy absorption and relative density cannot achieve optimum values at the same time, whereas reasonable optimal results of both the unit mass energy absorption and relative density are expected through multi-objective optimization. Weighting coefficients \(\omega _1 \) and \(\omega _2 \) strongly affect the results of multi-objective optimization. Weighting coefficients are set according to the requirements of practical engineering. Higher \(\omega _2 \) is achieved when the re-entrant cellular structure is regarded as an energy absorber, while higher \(\omega _1 \) is obtained when the re-entrant cellular structure is considered for structural parts with higher requirements of lightness.

## 6 Conclusions

A new re-entrant square cellular material was proposed. In exploring the relationship between microtopology and macrodynamic responses, the finite element method was employed to investigate the effects of cell microtopology on the dynamic behavior of the material under in-plane impact loading. This paper initially developed theoretical models of relative density employing a two-dimensional unit cell in light of three geometric parameters: cell wall thickness *t*, cell edge length *L*, and re-entrant distance *h*. The effects of geometric features and configurations on dynamic properties were then explored. To improve the efficiency of simulation, the LHS method was used in selecting sampling points from the design space. Simulations indicate that variations in geometric parameters strongly affect properties. For both RRS and SRS, increases in the re-entrant coefficient \(\beta \) and thickness coefficient \(\alpha \) increase stress \(\sigma \). Another finding is that the SRS has higher plateau stress and unit mass energy absorption than the RRS. Subsequently, the effects of various impact velocities on dynamic crushing behaviors were illustrated. It was found that the commonly used impact velocities of automobiles lie in the quasi-static region and varying the impact velocity had only a slight effect on the dynamic crushing behaviors. On this basis, the RSM was used to obtain relations between the unit mass energy absorption and geometric features for both the RRS and SRS. Furthermore, with targets of maximum unit mass energy absorption and minimum relative density, the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm was adopted to obtain optimal structural parameters. Meanwhile, a satisfaction function *Q* was proposed to select desired results from the Pareto solution set.

Analysis of the re-entrant square cellular material clarified the developed cellular material. Additionally, much of the analysis can contribute greatly to guiding design. Although the present study focused on two-dimensional cellular material, an extended analysis of three-dimensional re-entrant cellular material was carried out by identifying the dynamic processes. In future work, a systematic study of the overall performance of cellular material will be conducted by considering various boundary conditions, friction coefficients, cellular connections, and degrees of porosity. In addition, the study provides a detailed introduction to dynamic behaviors of cellular materials and guidance to design novel energy-absorbing structures with outstanding performances of energy absorption.

## Notes

### Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 201606170199) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB0101601).

## References

- 1.Schaedler, T.A., Carter, W.B.: Architected cellular materials. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res.
**46**(1), 187–210 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 2.Zhang, Q., Yang, X., Li, P., et al.: Bioinspired engineering of honeycomb structure-using nature to inspire human innovation. Prog. Mater. Sci.
**74**, 332–400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Dharmasena, K., Queheillalt, D., Wadley, H., et al.: Dynamic response of a multilayer prismatic structure to impulsive loads incident from water. Int. J. Impact Eng.
**36**(4), 632–643 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.Xiong, J., Ma, L., Wu, L., et al.: Mechanical behavior of sandwich panels with hollow Al–Si tubes core construction. Mater. Des.
**32**(2), 592–597 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.Liu, Y., Zhang, X.C.: The influence of cell micro-topology on the in-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs. Int. J. Impact Eng.
**36**(1), 98–109 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.Oftadeh, R., Haghpanah, B., Vella, D., et al.: Optimal fractal-like hierarchical honeycombs. Phys. Rev. Lett.
**113**(10), 104301 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Oftadeh, R., Haghpanah, B., Papadopoulos, J., et al.: Mechanics of anisotropic hierarchical honeycombs. Int. J. Mech. Sci.
**81**(4), 126–136 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Galehdari, S.A., Kadkhodayan, M., Hadidimoud, S.: Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity. Int. J. Crashworth.
**20**(4), 387–400 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., Ashby, M.F.: Multifunctionality of cellular metal systems. Prog. Mater. Sci.
**43**(3), 171–221 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 10.Fleck, N.A., Deshpande, V.S.: The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. J. Appl. Mech.
**71**(3), 386–401 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 11.Hutchinson, J.W., Xue, Z.: Metal sandwich plates optimized for pressure impulse. Int. J. Mech. Sci.
**47**(4), 545–569 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 12.Wang, A.J., Mcdowell, D.L.: In-plane stiffness and yield strength of periodic metal honeycombs. J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
**126**(2), 137–156 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 13.Wang, A.J., Mcdowell, D.L.: Yield surfaces of various periodic metal honeycombs at intermediate relative density. Int. J. Plast.
**21**(2), 285–320 (2005)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 14.Papka, S.D., Kyriakides, S.: Biaxial crushing of honeycombs: part 1: experiments. Int. J. Solids Struct.
**36**(29), 4367–4396 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 15.Papka, S.D., Kyriakides, S.: In-plane biaxial crushing of honeycombs: part II: analysis. Int. J. Solids Struct.
**36**(29), 4397–4423 (1999)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.Masters, I.G., Evans, K.E.: Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos. Struct.
**35**(4), 403–422 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 17.Smith, C.W., Grima, J.N., Evans, K.E.: A novel mechanism for generating auxetic behavior in reticulated foams: missing rib foam model. Acta Mater.
**48**(17), 4349–4356 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.Liu, X.L., Chen, Y.W., Jing, X.R., et al.: Optimized latin hypercube sampling method and its application. J. Natl. Univ. Def. Technol.
**33**(5), 73–77 (2011)Google Scholar - 19.Reyes, A., Hopperstad, O.S., Berstad, T., et al.: Constitutive modeling of aluminum foam including fracture and statistical variation of density. Eur. J. Mech. A. Solids
**22**(6), 815–835 (2003)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 20.Kleijnen, J.P.C.: An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis. Eur. J. Oper. Res.
**164**(2), 287–300 (2004)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 21.Lopatnikov, S.L., Gama, B.A., Haque, M.J., et al.: High-velocity plate impact of metal foams. Int. J. Impact Eng.
**30**(4), 421–445 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 22.Lopatnikov, S.L., Gama, B.A., Haque, M.J., et al.: Dynamics of metal foam deformation during Taylor cylinder-Hopkinson bar impact experiment. Compos. Struct.
**61**(1), 61–71 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 23.Hönig, A., Stronge, W.J.: In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycomb. Part I: crush band initiation and wave trapping. Int. J. Mech. Sci.
**44**(8), 1665–1696 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar - 24.Tan, P.J., Reid, S.R., Harrigan, J.J., et al.: Dynamic compressive strength properties of aluminum foams. Part II-‘shock’ theory and comparison with experimental data and numerical models. J. Mech. Phys. Solids
**53**(10), 2206–2230 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 25.Yong, Z.: Design optimization on lightweight of full vehicle based on moving least square response surface method. J. Mech. Eng.
**44**(11), 192–196 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.Holland, J.H.: Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, And Artificial Intelligence. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1975)MATHGoogle Scholar