Hierarchical Bayesian analyses have become a popular technique for analyzing complex interactions of important experimental variables. One application where these analyses have great potential is in analyzing neural data. However, estimating parameters for these models can be complicated. Although many software programs facilitate the estimation of parameters within hierarchical Bayesian models, due to some restrictions, complicated workarounds are sometimes necessary to implement a model within the software. One such restriction is convolution, a technique often used in neuroimaging analyses to relate experimental variables to models describing neural activation. Here, we show how to perform convolution within the R programming environment. The strategy here is to pass the convolved neural signal to existing software package for fitting hierarchical Bayesian models to data such as JAGS (Plummer 2003) or Stan (Carpenter et al. 2017). We use the convolution technique as a basis for describing neural time series data and develop five models to describe how subject-, condition-, and brain-area-specific effects interact. To provide a concrete example, we apply these models to fMRI data from a stop-signal task. The models are assessed in terms of model fit, parameter constraint, and generalizability. For these data, our results suggest that while subject and condition constraints are important for both fit and generalization, region of interest constraints did not substantially improve performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
We began our analysis by first examining pairwise functional correlations of each time series across all ROIs. These analyses revealed a potential need for ROI-based constraints, motivating the development of models 4 and 5.
Aguirre, G.K., Zarahn, E., D’Esposito, M. (1998). The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. NeuroImage, 8, 360–369.
Ahn, W.-Y., Krawitz, A., Kim, W., Busemeyer, J.R., Brown, J.W. (2011). A model-based fMRI analysis with hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 95–110.
Aron, A.R. (2007). The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control. Neuroscientist, 13, 214–228.
Aron, A.R., Robbins, T.W., Poldrack, R.A. (2014). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 177–185.
Bannon, S., Gonsalvez, C.J., Croft, R.J., Boyce, P.M. (2002). Response inhibition deficits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research, 110, 165–174.
Boucher, L., Palmeri, T.J., Logan, G.D., Schall, J.D. (2007). Inhibitory control in mind and brain: an interactive race model of countermanding saccades. Psychological Review, 114, 376–397.
Bowman, F.D., Caffo, B., Bassett, S.S., Kilts, C. (2008). A Bayesian hierarchical framework for spatial modeling of fMRI data. NeuroImage, 39, 146–156.
Boynton, G.M., Engel, S.A., Glover, G.H., Heeger, D.J. (1996). Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1. Journal of Neuroscience, 16(13), 4207–4221.
Buckner, R.L. (1998). Event-related fMRI and the hemodynamic response. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 373–377.
Carpenter, B., Gelman, A., Hoffman, M.D., Lee, D., Goodrich, B., Betancourt, M., Riddell, A. (2017). Stan: A probabilistic programming language. Journal of Statistical Software, 76(1), 1–32.
Chappell, M., Groves, A., Whitcher, B., Woolrich, M. (2009). Variational bayesian inference for a non-linear forward model. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 57, 223–236.
Chikazoe, J., Jimura, K., Asari, T., Yamashita, i.K., Morimoto, H., Hirose, S., Konishi, S. (2009). Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no-go task. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 146–152.
Cole, M.W., Yarkoni, T., Repovs, G., Anticevic, A., Braver, T.S. (2012). Global connectivity of prefrontal cortex predicts cognitive control and intelligence. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 8988–8999.
Dunovan, K., Lynch, B., Molesworth, T., Verstynen, T. (2015). Competing basal ganglia pathways determine the difference between stopping and deciding not to go. eLife, 4, e08723.
Friston, K., Holmes, A.P., Poline, J., Grasby, P., Williams, S., Frackowiak, R.S., Turner, R. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited. NeuroImage, 2(1), 45–53.
Friston, K., Penny, W., Phillips, C., Kiebel, S., Hinton, G., Ashburner, J. (2002). Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging. NeuroImage, 16, 465–483.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H.S., Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Glover, G. (1999). Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage, 9, 416–429.
Han, H., & Park, J. (2018). Using SPM 12’s second-level Bayesian inference procedure for fMRI analysis: practical guidelines for end users. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 12, 1.
Jung, R., & Haier, R. (2007). The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 135–154.
Kruschke, J.K. (2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis: a tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Burlington: Academic Press.
Lee, M.D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 1–15.
Leonski, B., Baxter, L.C., Karam, L.J., Maisog, J., Debbins, J. (2008). On the performance of autocorrelation estimation algorithms for fMRI analysis. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 828–838.
Li, X., Liang, Z., Kleiner, M., Lu, Z.-L. (2010). RTbox: a device for highly accurate response time measurements. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 212–225.
Lindquist, M.A. (2008). The statistical analysis of fMRI data. Statistical Science, 23, 439–464.
Logan, G.D. (1985). Executive control of through and action. Acta Psychologica, 60, 193–210.
Logan, G.D., & Cowan, W. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91, 295–327.
Logan, G.D., Van Zandt, T., Verbruggen, F., Wagenmakers, E.J. (2014). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control. Psychological Review, 121, 66–95.
Logan, G.D., Yamaguchi, M., Schall, J.D., Palmeri, T.J. (2015). Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding. Psychological Review, 122, 115–147.
Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Matzke, D., Dolan, C.V., Logan, G.D., Brown, S.D., Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian parametric estimation of stop-signal reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1047–1073.
Miller, E.K., & Cohen, J.D. (2001). An integrative theory of the prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Emerson, M., Witzki, A., Howerter, A., Wager, T. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14.
Molloy, M.F., Galdo, M., Bahg, G., Liu, Q., Turner, B.M. (in press). What’s in a response time?: On the importance of response time measures in constraining models of context effects.
Monterosso, J.R., Aron, A.R., Cordova, X., Xu, J., London, E.D. (2005). Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 79, 273–277.
Monti, M.M. (2011). Statistical analysis of fMRI time-series: a critical review of the GLM approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 28.
Mumford, J.A., & Nichols, T.E. (2008). Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation. NeuroImage, 39, 261–268.
Mumford, J.A., Turner, B.O., Ashby, F.G., Poldrack, R.A. (2012). Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses. NeuroImage, 59, 2636–2643.
Nigg, J. (2001). Is ADHD a disinhibitory disorder? Psychological Bulletin, 127, 571–598.
Nigg, J., Wong, M., Martel, M., Jester, J., Puttler, L., Glass, J., Zucker, R. (2006). Poor response inhibition as a predictor of problem drinking and illicit drug use in adolescents at risk for alcoholism and other substance use disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 468–475.
Palestro, J.J., Bahg, G., Sederberg, P.B., Lu, Z.-L., Steyvers, M., Turner, B.M. (2018). A tutorial on joint models of neural and behavioral measures of cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 84, 20–48.
Penadés, R., Catalán, R., Rubia, K., Andrés, S., Salamero, M., Gastó, C. (2007). Impaired response inhibition in obsessive compulsive disorder. European Psychiatry, 22, 404-410.
Penny, W., & Friston, K. (2004). Classical and Bayesian inference in fMRI. In Landini, L. (Ed.) Advanced image processing in magnetic resonance imaging. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Pitt, M.A., & Myung, I.J. (2002). When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 421–425.
Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on distributed statistical computing.
Poldrack, R.A., Mumford, J.A., Nichols, T. (2011). Handbook of functional MRI data analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poline, J.-B., & Brett, M. (2012). The general linear model and fMRI: does love last forever? NeuroImage, 62(2), 871–880.
Purdon, P.L., Solo, V., Weisskoff, R.M., Brown, E.N. (2001). Locally regularized spatiotemporal modeling and model comparison for functional MRI. NeuroImage, 14, 912–923.
Purdon, P.L., & Weisskoff, R.M. (1998). Effect of temporal autocorrelation due to physiological noise and stimulus paradigm on voxel-level false-positive rates in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 239–249.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J.N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychological Science, 9, 347–356.
Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., McKoon, G. (1999). Comparing connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261–300.
Rissman, J., Gazzaley, A., D’Esposito, M. (2004). Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task. NeuroImage, 23, 752–763.
Rouder, J.N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 573–604.
Rubia, K., Russell, T., Overmeyer, S., Brammer, M.J., Bullmore, E.T., Sharma, T., Taylor, E. (2001). Mapping motor inhibition: conjunctive brain activations across different versions of go/no-go and stop tasks. NeuroImage, 13, 250–261.
Schachar, R., & Logan, G.D. (1990). Impulsivity and inhibitory control in normal development and childhood psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 23, 710–720.
Sebastian, A., Jung, P., Neuhoff, J., Wibral, M., Fox, P., Lieb, K., Mobascher, A. (2016). Dissociable attentional and inhibitory networks of dorsal and ventral areas of the right inferior frontal cortex: a combined task-specific and coordinate-based meta-analytic fMRI study. Brain Structure and Function, 221, 1635–1651.
Sebastian, A., Pohl, M., Klöpper, S., Feige, B., Lange, T., Stahl, C., Tüscher, O. (2013). Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition. NeuroImage, 64, 601–615.
Shiffrin, R.M., Lee, M.D., Kim, W., Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248–1284.
Simmonds, D.J., Pekar, J.J., Mostofsky, S.H. (2008). Meta-analysis of go/no-go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task-dependent. Neuropsychologia, 46, 224–232.
Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M.W., Beckmann, C.F., Behrens, T.E., Johansen-Berg, H., Matthews, P.M. (2004). Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage, 23, S208–S219.
Swick, D., Ashley, V., Turken, U. (2011). Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks. NeuroImage, 56, 1655–1665.
ter Braak, C.J.F. (2006). A markov chain monte Carlo version of the genetic algorithm differential evolution: easy bayesian computing for real parameter spaces. Statistics and Computing, 16, 239–249.
Turner, B.M. (2015). Constraining cognitive abstractions through Bayesian modeling. In Forstmann, B.U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (Eds.) An introduction to model-based cognitive neuroscience (pp. 199–220). New York: Springer.
Turner, B.M., Forstmann, B.U., Love, B.U., Palmeri, T.J., Van Maanen, L. (2017). Approaches to analysis in model-based cognitive neuroscience. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 76, 65–79.
Turner, B.M., Forstmann, B.U., Steyvers, M. (2018). Computational approaches to cognition and perception. In Criss, A.H. (Ed.) Simultaneous modeling of neural and behavioral data. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Turner, B.M., Forstmann, B.U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Brown, S.D., Sederberg, P.B., Steyvers, M. (2013). A Bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 72, 193–206.
Turner, B.M., Rodriguez, C.A., Norcia, T., Steyvers, M., McClure, S.M. (2016). Why more is better: a method for simultaneously modeling EEG, fMRI, and behavior. NeuroImage, 128, 96–115.
Turner, B.M., Sederberg, P.B., Brown, S., Steyvers, M. (2013). A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. Psychological Methods, 18, 368–384.
Turner, B.M., Van Maanen, L., Forstmann, B.U. (2015). Informing cognitive abstractions through neuroimaging: the neural drift diffusion model. Psychological Review, 122, 312–336.
Van Zandt, T. (2000). How to fit a response time distribution. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 424–465.
Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. (2008). Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 418–424.
Woolrich, M.W. (2012). Bayesian inference in FMRI. NeuroImage, 62, 801–810.
Zarahn, E., Aguirre, G.K., D’Esposito, M. (1997). Empirical analyses of BOLD fMRI statistics. NeuroImage, 5, 179–197.
Zhang, L., Guindani, M., Vannucci, M. (2015). Bayesian models for fMRI data analysis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics, 7, 21–41.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the university.
Appendix A: R Code for the canonical hemodynamic response function
Appendix B: R Code for the boxcar function
Appendix C: R Code for boxcar convolution using discrete approximation
Appendix D: JAGS Code for Model 3
About this article
Cite this article
Molloy, M.F., Bahg, G., Li, X. et al. Hierarchical Bayesian Analyses for Modeling BOLD Time Series Data. Comput Brain Behav 1, 184–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-018-0013-5
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging