Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of upstream water abstraction and climate variability on River Mpanga hydropower production in Uganda

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated impacts of water abstraction and climate variability on Mpanga hydropower. Flow exceedance probabilities over hydrologically wet and dry conditions were compared. Hydropower productions with and without water abstraction were compared. Capacity of the hydropower plant on River Mpanga is 18 Megawatts which can be produced with the river flow of 16 m3/s. The differences in means of daily flows over the periods 2000–2013 and 2014–2020 considering exceedance probability selected in the range 20–50% were found to be significant (p < 0.05) based on Student t tests. Thus, the study area has been hydrologically wetter recently (2014–2020) than it was over the sub-period 2000–2013. The mean of days with flows ≥ 16 m3/s in each year over the period 2014–2020 was nearly 100 days and this was equivalent to hydropower of about 1800 Megawatts. The number of days in each year with flows ≥ 16 m3/s was on average far less over the period 2000–2013 than that from 2014 to 2020. The annual mean of hydropower from daily flows ≥ 16 m3/s during dry (such as 2000–2013) period can be about 10% of the values averaged over years with wet condition (e.g., period 2014–2020). Interannual climate variability can annually cause gain or loss of up to 16% hydropower compared with that from a year with “regular” seasons. Hydropower lost during dry (wet) season due to water abstraction was over the range 4–7% (0.4–1.6%) compared with the actual amount. These results are vital for adaptive planning of hydropower production amidst impacts of climate variability and human activities on hydrology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The PET data used in this study were obtained from the Climatic Research Unit. The link where to download the PET data was provided within the paper.

Code availability

The code used in this study can be obtained from the main author upon request.

References

  • Anaba, L. A., Banadda, N., Kiggundu, N., Wanyama, J., Engel, B., & Moriasi, D. N. (2017). Application of SWAT to assess the effects of land-use change in the Murchison Bay catchment in Uganda. Computational Water, Energy, and Environmental Engineering, 6, 4–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayugi, B. O., Tan, G., Ongoma, V., & Mafuru, K. B. (2018). Circulations associated with variations in boreal spring rainfall over Kenya. Earth Systems and Environment, 2, 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahati, H. K., Ogenrwoth, A., & Sempewo, J. I. (2021). Quantifying the potential impacts of land-use and climate change on hydropower reliability of Muzizi hydropower plant Uganda. Journal of Water and Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.273 in press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barasa, B., Egeru, A., Okello, P., & Mutuzo, F. (2010). Dynamics of land-use/cover trends in Kanungu District, South-Western Uganda. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 14, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadi, S. A., & Owusu, K. (2017). Impact of climate change and variability on hydropower in Ghana. African Geographical Review, 38, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britannica, (2021). Climate change within a human life span. https://www.britannica.com/science/climate-change/Climate-change-within-a-human-life-span. Accessed: 16th Jul 2021.

  • Conway, D., Dalin, C., Landman, W. A., & Osborn, T. J. (2017). Hydropower plans in eastern and southern Africa increase risk of concurrent climate-related electricity supply disruption. Nature Energy, 2, 946–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daily Monitor, (2011). Mpanga hydropower plant commissioned. Retrived online via the link http://www.monitor.co.ug/Business/Technology/-/688612/1106832/-/9huacbz/-/index.html. Accessed 06 Mar 2020.

  • Davidson, A. C., & Hinkley, D. V. (1997). Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (p. 582). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NS Energy, (2020). Hydropower in Africa: A spotlight on recent developments: URL: https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/hydropower-africa/. Accessed: 14th Jul 2021.

  • Falchetta, G., Gernaat, D., Hunt, J., & Sterl, S. (2019). Hydropower dependency and climate change in sub-Saharan Africa: A nexus framework and evidence-based review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1399–1417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernaat, D. E., Bogaart, P. W., Van Vuuren, D. P., Biemans, H., & Niessink, R. (2017). High-resolution assessment of global technical and economic hydropower potential. Nature Energy, 2, 821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamududu, B. H., & Killingtveit, Å. (2016). Hydropower production in future climate scenarios; the case for the Zambezi River. Energies, 9, 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9070502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., & Lister, D. (2020). Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Scientific Data, 7, 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoes, O. A., Meijer, L. J., Van Der Ent, R. J., & Van De Giesen, N. C. (2017). Systematic high-resolution assessment of global hydropower potential. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0171844. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171844

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Hydropower Association. (2018). Hydropower Status Report. International Hydropower Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Hydropower Association, (2020). Region Profile Africa. https://www.hydropower.org/region-profiles/africa. Accessed: 14th July 2021.

  • Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Guevara, E. 2008. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Available online: http://srtm.csi.cgiar.org. Accessed on 04 Jun 2019.

  • Kizza, C. L., Tenywa, M. M., Kansiime, F., Magunda, M., Nakileza, B., Barasa, B., Gabiri, G., Sebuliba, E., & Nampijja, J. (2017). Land-use/cover change patterns in highland ecosystems of Lake Bunyonyi catchment in western, Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, 25, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korkovelos, A., Mentis, D., Siyal, S. H., Arderne, C., Rogner, H., Bazilian, M., Howells, M., Beck, H., & De Roo, A. (2018). A Geospatial assessment of small-scale hydropower potential in sub-Saharan Africa. Energies, 11(11), 3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11113100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R., Eberhard, A., & Gratwick, K. (2018). Uganda’s power sector reform: There and back again? Energy for Sustainable Development, 43, 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, (2015). Sector Development Plan 2015/16–2019/20. Energy and Mineral Development Sector, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, p 233.

  • Ministry of Water and Environment, (2013). Framework and guidelines for water source protection—volume 1: Framework for Water Source Protection. Government of Uganda, p 75.

  • National Planning Authority, (2010). Third National Development Plan (NDP I) 2010/11–2014/15. NPA, Government of Uganda, p 441.

  • National Planning Authority, (2013). Uganda Vision 2040. Government of Uganda, p 136.

  • National Planning Authority, (2015). Third National Development Plan (NDP II) 2015/16–2019/20. NPA, Government of Uganda, p 344.

  • National Planning Authority, (2020). Third National Development Plan (NDP III) 2020/21–2024/25. NPA, Government of Uganda, p 258.

  • Ngoma, H., Wen, W., Ayugi, B., Karim, R., & Kisesa, M. E. (2021). Mechanisms associated with September to November (SON) rainfall over Uganda during the recent decades. Geographica Pannonica, 25(1), 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, S. E. (2017). Climate and climatic variability of rainfall over eastern Africa. Review of Geophysics, 55(3), 590–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C. (2016). Variability of seasonal and annual rainfall in the River Nile riparian countries and possible linkages to ocean–atmosphere interactions. Hydrology Research, 47, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C. (2018). Trends and variability in African long-term precipitation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32, 2721–2739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-018-1587-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C. (2021). Long-term climatic water availability trends and variability across the African continent. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03669-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C., & Willems, P. (2017). Space-time variability of extreme rainfall in the River Nile basin. International Journal of Climatology, 37(4), 4915–4924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C., Asiimwe, A., Muhwezi, L., & Mubialiwo, A. (2021a). Water availability trends across water management zones in Uganda. Atmospheric Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onyutha, C., Amollo, C. J., Nyende, J., & Nakagiri, A. (2021b). Suitability of averaged outputs from multiple rainfall-runoff models for hydrological extremes: A case of River Kafu catchment in East Africa. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 5, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-020-00075-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, A., & Rathnayake, U. (2019). Impact of climate variability on hydropower generation in an un-gauged catchment: Erathna run-of-the-river hydropower plant Sri Lanka. Applied Water Science, 9, 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-0925-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnia, P., Darabi, H., Choubin, B., Omidvar, E., Onyutha, C., & Haghighi, A. T. (2019). Contribution of climatic variability and human activities to stream flow changes in the Haraz River basin, northern Iran. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 25, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2019.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., & Jarvis, A. (2007). An evaluation of void filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(9), 983–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810601169899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, D. (1968). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference. Havard College-Cambridge, Massachusetts, January 1968, pp 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1145/800186.810616

  • Sridharan V., Ramos E.P., Taliotis C., Howells M., Basudde P., & Kinhonhi I.V. (2018). Vulnerability of Uganda’s electricity sector to climate change: an integrated systems analysis. In: Leal Filho W. (ed) Handbook of Climate Change Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_45-1

  • The International Energy Agency. (2017). Energy Access Outlook 2017: From Poverty to Prosperity. International Energy Agency.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Twaha, S., Ramli, M., Murphy, P., Mukhtiar, M., & Nsamba, H. (2016). Renewable based distributed generation in Uganda: Resource potential and status of exploitation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 786–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited, (2019). Genews: The official news letter of UEGCL, 2019. UEGCL, Issue 5, 58pp. Available online via https://uegcl.com/publications/ge-news/88-genews-issue-5-final/file.html. Accessed on 15 Dec 2020.

  • Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited, (2021). Major power plants. Retrieved via https://www.uegcl.com/publications/maps-of-power-plants-dams.html. Accessed: 3rd Apr 2021.

  • United Nations, (2015). Goal 7—Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Sustainable Development, United Nations. Retrieved via https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal7. Accessed: 3rd Apr 2021.

  • Van Butsel, J., Donoso, N., Gobeyn, S., De Troyer, N., Van Echelpoel, W., Lock, K., Bwambale, G., Muganzi, E., Muhangi, C., Nalumansi, N., Peeters, L., & Goethals, P. L. M. (2017). Report: Ecological Water Quality Assessment of the Mpanga Catchment Western, Uganda (p. 37). Ghent University.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Meteorological Organization, (2008). Hydrological data. In: Manual on low-flow estimation and prediction; Operational Hydrology Report No. 50, WMO-No.1029, Geneva, Switzerland, p 138.

  • World Small Hydropower Development Report, (2016). United Nations Industrial Development Organization: Vienna, Austria; International Center on Small Hydro Power: Hangzhou, China, 2016.

  • Zhou, Y., Hejazi, M., Smith, S., Edmonds, J., Li, H., Clarke, L., Calvin, K., & Thomson, A. (2015). A comprehensive view of global potential for hydro-generated electricity. Energy and Environmental Science, 8, 2622–2633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge that the PET data sets were of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time-Series (TS) version 4.0 covering the period 1901–2019 (Harris et al., 2020) downloaded via https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/ (accessed: 24th November 2020).

Funding

This research study was financially supported by the Africa EMS Mpanga Limited (AEML).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors were involved in the conception of the study, data acquisition, processing, and interpretation. C.O. was further involved in drafting the manuscript and making necessary revision. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Onyutha.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval

This research did not involve human subjects.

Consent to participate

This research did not involve human subjects.

Consent for publication

This research did not involve personal information for which consent could have been sought.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Onyutha, C., Kerudong, P.A., Guma, B.E. et al. Impacts of upstream water abstraction and climate variability on River Mpanga hydropower production in Uganda. Int J Energ Water Res 6, 49–66 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00137-1

Keywords

Navigation