Skip to main content
Log in

Impact assessment of sanitation system on the socio-economic aspects of local community and environment in Hunza Valley Gilgit Baltistan-Pakistan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 08 May 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

This study encompasses the socio-economic and environmental aspects of the first ever constructed sanitation system in Gilgit Baltistan. The sanitation system is located in the hub of Hunza valley and covers three major villages, i.e., Karimabad, Mominabad, and Ganish. Pertaining to the terrain of the area, Karimabad is located at upstream, while Mominabad and Ganish are located downstream. Soon after the completion of the project, the sewage water from the sourcepoint was carried to a treatment plant located in Mominabad, through sewerage lines. The sewage water after treatment was subsequently used for irrigation purposes by the farmers in Ganish village. This treatment plant remained functional for hardly 3 years. Since then, untreated sewage water is drained to irrigation water channels of Ganish and is being used by farmers for agricultural practices. This practice is posing negative impacts on the health of downstream community in the form of water born and fecal-related diseases. The objectives of this study were to measure impacts of the constructed sanitation project on health security and assess sewerage water quality for irrigation purposes. To collect the information on socio-economic aspects, structured questionnaire was used. Focus group discussions (FGDs) and key informant interviews were also carried out for triangulation purpose and to substantiate the collected data. Sewerage water samples were tested in laboratory for analyzing its suitability for irrigation purposes as per WHO standards. Due to geographic advantage, being at upstream, the sanitation system is promising for the population of Karimabad village; however, the project is adversely affecting the community at downstream (Ganish and Mominabad) due to negative environmental and health impacts. The laboratory analysis of sewerage water showed that electrical conductivity, pH, chemical oxygen demand, sodium, chlorides, nitrates, and phosphates values were above the permissible limits. Currently, there are several sanitation projects under construction in Gilgit Baltistan by the government and other non-government organizations (NGO) with the involvement of community under build, operate, and transfer (BOT) model. There is a need to implement the lessons learnt from the Karimabad sanitation project and devise a strategy to cope with the operational and maintenance issues. Besides, there is a need to develop linkages with the line departments, i.e., EPA, Health department, etc. to carry out regular laboratory analysis of sewage water. It is highly recommended that government should allocate funds for maintenance of treatment plants on annual basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 08 May 2019

    In the original publication of the paper the second author Muhammad Bilal was missing. You can find the complete list with authors above.

References

  • Ahmed, I., Quarshie, A. M., Ofori-Amanfo, D., Cobbold, F., Amofa-Sarkodie, E. S., & Awuah, E. (2018). Assessment of foreign material load in the management of faecal sludge in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Science, 3(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijees.20180301.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alghobar, M. A., & Suresha, S. (2017). Evaluation of metal accumulation in soil and tomatoes irrigated with sewerage water from Mysore city, Karnataka, India. Journal of the Saudi Society Agricultural Sciences., 16, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avvannavar, S. M., & Mani, M. (2008). A conceptual model of people’s approach to sanitation. Science of the Total Environment, 3(90), 1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, R. S., & Westcot, D. W. (1985). Water quality for agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buechler, S., Devi, G., & Raschid-Sally, L. (2002). Livelihoods and wastewater irrigated agriculture along the Musi River in Hyderabad City, Andhra Pradesh, India. Urban Agriculture Magazine, 8, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, P. F. (2007). Historical aspects of wastewater treatment. In P. Lens, G. Zeeman, & G. Lettinga (Eds.), Decentralized sanitation and rescue-concepts, systems and implimentation (pp. 11–38). London: 7 IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajjami, K., Ennaji, M. M., Fouad, S., & Oubrim, N. (2013). Wastewater reuse for irrigation in Moroccon: Helminth eggs contamination’s level of irrigated crops and sanitary risk (a case study of Settat andSoualem regions). Journal of Bacteriology and Parasitology, 4, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, N. U., Mahmood, Q., Waseem, A., Irshad, M., & Pervez, A. (2013). Assessment of heavy metals in wheat plants irrigated with contaminated wastewater. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 22(1), 115–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S., & Hanjra, M. A. (2008). Sustainable land and water management policies and practices: a pathway to environmental sustainability in large irrigation systems. Land Degradation and Development, 19(3), 469–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langergraber, G., & Muellegger, E. (2005). Ecological sanitation—a way to solve global sanitation problems. Environment International, 31, 433–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, A., & Asano, T. (2004). Recovering sustainable water from wasterwater. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 1, 201A–208A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muchuweti, M., Birkett, J. W., Chinyanga, E., Zvauya, R., Scrimshaw, M. D., & Lester, J. N. (2006). Heavy metal content of vegetables irrigated with mixtures of wastewater and sewage sludge in Zimbabwe: Implications for human health. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 112, 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (USA). (1972). Water quality criteria 1972. National Academy of Sclences/Natlonal Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC, USA.

  • Ongley, E. D. (1996). Control of water pollution from agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 55. FAO, Rome.

  • Rashid, M. M., & Hayes, D. F. (2011). Needs-based sewerage prioritization: Alternative to conventional cost benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Management., 92, 2427–2440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. A., Zaeazua, J. A., & Levine, G. (2000). Urban wastewater reuse for crop production in the water short Guanajuato River Basin, Mexico. http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/pubs/rrindex.htm. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • Singh, A., Sharma, R. K., Agrawal, M., & Marshall, F. (2009). Effects of wastewater irrigation on physic chemical properties of soil and availability of heavy metals in soil and vegetables. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40(21–22), 3469–3490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Giller, K. E. (1992). Effective Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii present in five soils contaminated with heavy metals from long term applications of sewerage sluge or metal mine spoil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24(8), 781–788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swarup, D., Dwivedi, S. K., & Dey, S. (1997). Lead and chromium levels in blood and milk of cows from Khanpur city. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 67(3), 222–223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, K. S., Anda, M., Sturman, J., Mathew, K., & Ho, G. (2005). Subsurface dripline tubing—an experimental design for assessing the effectiveness of using dripline to apply treated wastewater for turf irrigation in Western Australia. In M. H. Muston & A. I. Scafer (Eds.), Integrated concepts in water recycling (ICWR 2005) (pp. 670–679). Wollongong: University of Wollongong.

    Google Scholar 

  • UCCC (University of California Committee of Consultants). (1974). Guidelines for interpretations of water quality for irrigation. Technical bulletin, University of California Committee of Consultants, California, USA (pp. 20–28).

  • UNEP/GEF/KALMAR Högskola, Invemar. (2006). Global International Water Assessment (GIWA), Caribbean Sea/Colombia and Venezuela, Central America and Mexico GIWA Regional Assessment 3b, 3c, Kalmar Sweden.

  • UNICEF, Uni, Noorani. (2016). Strategy for water, sanitation and hygiene. https://www.unicef.org/wash/files/UNICEF_strategy_for_WASH_2016_2030.PDF. Accessed 20 Feb 2019.

  • UNICEF-Ghana (2015). Water, sanitation and hygiene, the case for support (pp. 1–14).

  • Winblad, U., & Simpson-Hebert, M. (2004). Ecological sanitation (2nd ed.). Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2006). Guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2007).Technology for water supply and sanitation in developing countries. Report of a WHO study group. WHO technical report series, no. 742, Geneva.

  • Wu, L., Rutherford, S., & Chu, C. (2011). The need for health impact assessment in China: Potential benefits for public health and steps forward. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(4), 420–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. X., Tan, J. J., Chen, F. L., Si, J. H., & Xu, B. N. (2003). Fertilizaer, Wastewater and Ecoalgal Cancer (p. 226). Beijin: Science Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H. Z., Mab, A. J., Lianga, X. G., Shic, P. L., & Menge, F. S. (2012). Post-analysis in environmental impact of the ecological construction projects. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 1754–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qaisar Mahmood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest for the current study.

Ethical committee

The study was approved by ethical committee of the department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, Pakistan comprising Dr. Bahadar Nawab and Dr. Qaisar Mahmood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baig, F., Nawab, B. & Mahmood, Q. Impact assessment of sanitation system on the socio-economic aspects of local community and environment in Hunza Valley Gilgit Baltistan-Pakistan. Int J Energ Water Res 3, 73–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-019-00015-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-019-00015-x

Keywords

Navigation