Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the effect of sodium hydroxide solution on biogas yield of anaerobic digestion of poultry waste and the digestate

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of adding an alkaline solution, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), in optimizing biogas and methane yield from poultry waste anaerobically was investigated in this work. Two digesters of 50 l capacity each were set up and labeled A and B. Digester A was batched with a mixture of 19 kg of PW and 19 l of water, while digester B has the same mixed volume ratio of poultry waste and water as in digester A but with the addition of 380 ml of 1 M NaOH. Daily gas yield was obtained from the two digesters for a retention period of 30 days; the temperature and pH were also recorded. The peak yield from digester A was recorded on day 23 to be 0.0392 m3, while digester B peak yield of 0.0522 m3 was recorded on day 18. The cumulative biogas yields at the end of the retention period were 0.5511 m3 and 0.6070 m3, respectively, for both digesters. The coefficient of correlation R2 between the gas yields of the two samples is 0.9657. The biogas obtained from the two setups was analyzed with digester B (poultry waste + water + 380 ml of 1 M NaOH) having an appreciable methane yield of 3.03% than digester A.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adelekan, B. A., Oluwatoyinbo, F. I., & Bamgboye, A. I. (2010). Comparative effects of undigested and anaerobically digested poultry manure on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays, L.). African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4(2), 100–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adewumi, A. A., Adewumi, I. K., & Olaleye, V. F. (2011). Livestock waste menace: Fish wealth-solution. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 5, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadu, T. O., Folayan, C. O., & Yawas, D. S. (2009). Comparative performance of cow dung and chicken droppings for biogas production. Nigerian Journal of Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, ABU, Zaria, 16(1), 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (APHA). (2005). American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association (APHA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragaw, T., & Andargie, M. (2013). Co-digestion of cattle manure with organic kitchen waste to increase biogas production using rumen fluid as inoculums. International Journal of Physical Science, 8, 443–450.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aremu, M. O., & Agarry, S. E. (2013). Enhanced biogas production from poultry droppings using corn-cob and waste paper as co-substrate. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), 5(2), 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babatola, J. O. (2008). Comparative study of biogas yield pattern in some animal and household wastes. International Multidisciplinary Journal of African Research Review, 2(4), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrère, H. (2010). Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cu, T. T. T., Pham, H. C., Le, T. H., Nguyen, V. C., Le, X. A., Nguyen, X. T., et al. (2012). Manure management practices on biogas and non-biogas pig farms in developing countries—Using livestock farms in Vietnam as an example. Journal of Cleaner Production, 27, 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deluca, T. H., & Deluca, D. K. (1997). Contemporary issues: Composting for feedlot manure management and soil quality. Journal of Production Agriculture, 10, 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, G., Frunzo, L., Liotta, F., Panico, A., & Pirozzi, F. (2012). BMP tests to measure the biogas production from the digestion and co-digestion of complex organic substrates. Open Journal of Environmental Engineering, 5, 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H. H., & Zhang, T. (2015). Anaerobic biotechnology: Environmental protection and resource recovery. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fatma, A., Yuzaburo, N., Maria, R. K., Naomichi, N., & Yutaka, N. (2014). Enhancement of methane production from co-digestion of chicken manure with agricultural wastes. Bioresource Technology, 159, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garba, B., & Sambo, A. S. (1995). Effect of some operating parameters on biogas production rate. Nigerian Journal of Renewable Energy, 3, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar, M., Kalman, G., & Reczey, K. (2007). Corn fiber as a raw material for hemicellulose and ethanol production. Process Biochemistry, 42(7), 1135–1139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldemberg, J., & Johansson, T. B. (2004). World energy assessment overview, 2004 update (p. 88). NewYork: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisel, C., Laura, P., Umapada, P., Fortino, B., & Minerva, R. (2013). Generation of biogas from coffee-pulp and cow-dung co-digestion: Infrared studies of postcombustion emissions. Energy Conversion and Management, 74, 471–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilaboya, I. R., Asekhame, F. F., Ezugwu, M. O., Erameh, A. A., & Omofuma, F. E. (2010). Studies on biogas generation from agricultural waste; Analysis of the effects of alkaline on gas generation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 9(5), 537–545.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, A., Hossain, S., & Iqbal, S. A. (2016). Upgraded method of biogas production from kitchen waste, cow dung and chicken manure in anaerobic co-digestion process. In International conference on mechanical, industrial and energy engineering 26–27 December, 2016, Khulna, Bangladesh.

  • Jungbluth, N., Chudacoff, M., Dauriat, A., Dinkel, F., Doka, G., FaistEmmenegger, M., Gnansounou, E., Kljun, N., Schleiss, K., Spielmann, M., Stettler, C., & Sutter, J. (2007). Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Ecoinvent report no. 17, v2.0. http://www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.

  • Khandeiwal, K. C., & Mahdi, S. S. (1986). Biogas technology: A practical handbook (Vol. I). New Delhi: Tata McGraw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Park, S. Y., & Zhu, J. (2011). Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 821–826.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Zhang, R., Chen, C., Liu, G., He, Y., & Liu, X. (2013). Biogas production from codigestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions. Bioresource Technology, 149, 406–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ofoefule, A. U., Uzodinma, E. O., & Anyanwu, C. N. (2010). Studies on the effect of anaerobic digestion on the microbial flora of animal wastes: Digestion and modeling of process parameters. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 5(1), 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojolo, S. J., Dinrifo, R. R., & Adesuyi, K. B. (2007). Comparative study of biogas production from five substrates. Advanced Materials Research Journal, 18(19), 519–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otun, T. F., Ojo, O. M., Ajibade, F. O., & Babatola, J. O. (2015). Evaluation of biogas production from the digestion and codigestion of animal waste, food waste and fruit waste. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Research, 3(3), 12–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. J. (2009). PlanEnergi and researcher for a day (2nd ed.). Aarhus: Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aarhus University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajendra, S., Karki, A. B., & Jagan, N. S. (2008). Production of biogas from poultry waste. International Journal of Renewable Energy, 3(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • REN-21. (2014). Renewables 2014. Global status report. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.

  • Rittmann, B. E. (2008). Opportunities for renewable bioenergy using microorganisms. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 100(2), 203–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G., & Han, X. (2012). Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic codigestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 120, 78–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Yang, G., Li, F., Feng, Y., & Ren, G. (2013). Response surface optimization of methane potentials in anaerobic co-digestion of multiple substrates: Dairy, chicken manure and wheat. Waste Management and Research, 31, 60–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warnars, L., & Oppenoorth, H. (2014). Bioslurry: A supreme fertiliser. A study on bioslurry results and uses. Hivos, The Hague, Netherlands. http://hivos.org/sites/default/files/bioslurry_book.Pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.

  • Xie, S., Lawlow, P. G., Frost, J. P., Hu, Z., & Zhan, X. (2011). Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and grass silage. Bioresource Technology, 102, 5728–5733.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Staff of the ISV Analytical Laboratory, University of Ibadan, Nigeria for their support and contribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. H. Lasisi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the content of this article has no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ajiboye, A.V., Lasisi, K.H. & Babatola, J.O. Evaluation of the effect of sodium hydroxide solution on biogas yield of anaerobic digestion of poultry waste and the digestate. Int J Energ Water Res 2, 23–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-018-0003-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-018-0003-2

Keywords

Navigation