Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic analysis of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques: a comparative study

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large deflection of a simply supported beam (SSB) carrying central point load is a well-known area in mechanics that has been researched extensively by numerous scholars. Various techniques, including the finite element approach and analytical exact solutions, have been implemented. Few researchers also used machine learning (ML) technique to predict deflection of SSB. This study offers ML based prediction method for deflection of SSB carrying point load and compares the applicability and adaptability of ridge regression model, artificial neural network and Gaussian process regression (GPR) in the reliability investigation of SSB. The central point load (W), beam length (L), beam width (B), beam depth (D), and concrete’s modulus of elasticity (E) are the five key input parameters that these three machine learning models take into consideration when applying them to 200 datasets in order to predict the beam deflection (∆) at the centre of the beam. The effectiveness of the well-established ML models is evaluated using a variety of performance metrics, such as coefficient of determination (R2), variance account factor, A-10 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error and mean absolute deviation. Based on performance parameters, the findings indicate that, out of the three suggested machine learning models, GPR had the best predictive performance. This was attributed to its maximum R2 = 1.000 and the lowest RMSE = 1.157E-06 during the training phase, as well as R2 = 0.999 and RMSE = 0.006 during the testing phase. Rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression plot, William’s plot, and error matrix plot are further tools used to assess the performance of the model. First-order second moment (FOSM) approach is used to determine the reliability index (β) of the model and compared with the actual value. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out to determine the impact of each input parameter on the result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data presented in the paper are available with authors.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing; TA: Software.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashid Mustafa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mustafa, R., Ahmad, M.T. Probabilistic analysis of simply supported concrete beam using machine learning techniques: a comparative study. Asian J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01020-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01020-0

Keywords

Navigation