Skip to main content
Log in

Pre-fabricated multi-storey steel structure exposure to engineering seismicity

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasingly Embraced for Diverse Architectural Applications, pre-fabricated steel building systems offer a multitude of advantages over conventional construction methods, despite their relatively recent introduction. While their construction methodology is well-grasped concerning gravitational forces (dead and live loads), their behavior under dynamic loads, such as seismic and wind forces, remains less explored. Unique structural configurations within these edifices can yield notably distinct structural responses and failure modes compared to their conventional counterparts. Existing research has demonstrated that modular structures, when subjected to lateral forces, often experience failure in critical components, specifically the columns. The compromise of these pivotal elements can lead to partial or complete structural collapses. In the Indian context, pre-fabricated structures have found extensive employment in development projects. Yet, their performance under seismic conditions has been compromised due to inherent design shortcomings. Particularly in regions prone to high seismic activity, earthquakes have the potential to inflict substantial damage upon these structures if not meticulously planned for. Recent devastating seismic events have underscored the inadequacies of conventional construction standards, where systems designed to withstand seismic forces are anticipated to absorb and dissipate energy during intense tremors. Consequently, traditional seismic systems can exhibit substantial residual deformations and widespread structural deterioration post major earthquakes. Failures frequently manifest at the junctures where structural members are interconnected in such scenarios. To confront these challenges head-on, this paper recommends the substitution of steel structures for reinforced concrete (RC) structures within various high seismic zones across India. The envisaged design and analysis will leverage a range of software tools including AutoCAD and Staad.PRO. The primary objective is to bolster the seismic resilience of buildings and curtail the vulnerability of structural failure amid seismic events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Duggal, S. K. (2010). Limit state design of steel structures. The Mcgraw- Hill Companies.

  • ETABS. Version 15 (Computer software) (2020). Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, CA.

  • Indian standard code, IS 875 Part (I, II, III, IV). (1987). Code of practice for design loads.

  • Indian standard code, IS 1893–1. (2002). Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.

  • Indian standard code, IS 800. (2007). General construction in steel - code of practice.

  • IS 875-2. (1987). Guidelines for design load determination (excluding earthquake) for buildings and structures, part 2: Applied loads [CED 37 structural safety].

  • Kaewkulchai, G., & Williamson, E. B. (2004). Beam element formulation and solution procedure for dynamic progressive collapse analysis. Computers & Structures, 82(7–8), 639–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2003.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., et al. (2010). Optimizing steel frame seismic design through ant colony optimization in performance-based analysis. Research in Constructional Steel, 66, 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Ardebili, S. R. (2021). A comparative study of the optimum tuned mass damper for high-rise structures considering soil-structure interaction. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 65(4), 1036–1049. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.18386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Bakhshpori, T. (2013). Optimum design of steel frames using Cuckoo search algorithm with Lévy fights. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 13(34), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.754/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Farahmand Azar, B., Hadidi, A., Rezazadeh Sorochi, F., & Talatahari, S. (2010). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames using ant colony optimization. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66, 566–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Ilchi Ghazaan, M. (2018). Optimum seismic design of 3D irregular steel frames recently developed modern metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32(3), 04018015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78780-0_9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Izadifard, R. A., & Mottaghi, L. (2020). Optimal design of planar RC frames considering CO2 emissions using ECBO, EVPS and PSO metaheuristic algorithms. Journal of Building Engineering, 28, 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M., & Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2013). Constructability optimal design of reinforced concrete retaining walls using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 47(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.2.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Kalateh-Ahani, M., & Fahimi-Farzam, M. (2014). Lifecycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: Performance-based seismic design approach. Earthquakes and Structures, 3, 271–294. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.3.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Laknejadi, K., & Alinejad, B. (2012). Performance based multi-objective optimization of large steel structures. Acta Mechanica, 2(223), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-011-0564-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Nasrollahi, A. (2014). Performance-based seismic design of steel frames utilizing charged system search optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 22, 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Zakian, P. (2014). Seismic design optimisation of RC moment frames and dual shear wall-frame structures via CSS algorithm. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 15, 435–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal, K., et al. (2009). Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed steel braced frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(3), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatib, I. F, et al. (1988). Seismic behavior of concentrically braced steel frames. Report No. UCB/EERC-88/01. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California at Berkeley

  • Paul, S., Murty, C. V. R., & Jain, S. K. (2000). State of the art review of seismic design of steel moment resisting frames—Part-I. General considerations and stability provisions. Journal of Structural Engineering, 27(1), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, A., & Sangle, K. (2018). Progressive collapse analysis of seismically design low rise steel frame structure. ARPN: Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13(1), 1819–6608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, A. B., & Sangle, K. (2023). Analysis of seismically engineered three-dimensional special moment resisting frames with a focus on progressive collapse resisting frames. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24, 1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00590-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari, A. B., Sangle, K. K., & Mohitkar, V. M. (2023). Progressive collapse analysis of seismically designed braced and unbraced steel frame structures. Asian. Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00709-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, Q. (2002). Inelastic and seismic response of steel members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58(5–8), 655–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00104-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper’s authors express gratitude to the management and Administrative Office of K J College of Engineering in Pune, India for their valuable coordination throughout the project.

Funding

This study was not received any financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul B. Pujari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no-conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pujari, A.B., Momin, A. Pre-fabricated multi-storey steel structure exposure to engineering seismicity. Asian J Civ Eng 25, 2787–2799 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00945-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00945-2

Keywords

Navigation