Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal design of FPSO topside module for in-place, lift and weighing conditions utilizing meta-heuristic optimization algorithms

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The repetitive modelling required for traditional structural design work is a laborious and time-consuming task. Yet, the cost significantly increases due to the wide variety of profiles. It is suggested to use grouping technique along with algorithms to optimize structural elements in order to address these issues. In this paper, two meta-heuristic algorithms viz; Cuckoo Search algorithm and Thermal Exchange Optimization algorithm are employed for weight optimization of FPSO supporting structure. These algorithms identify the structure’s least weight for the offshore floating platform design. The current work suggests a method for FPSO structure design that is reliability-based and optimal. The current study discusses the optimized design of the topside FPSO structural assembly for various load conditions, such as production tank pressure loads, equipment loads, piping loads, electrical and instrumentation loads, girder deformation loads, wind load, and so on. The effects of hull flexibility, as well as wind and motion-induced accelerations, are considered for both Normal Operating and Extreme Operating conditions. The analysis and design optimization are carried out in the STAAD Pro and analytical tool by selecting the least weight as an objective function while adhering to the API design constraints on displacement and stress limits. Module primary structure design can be iteratively “optimized” using the algorithm and stress ratio as described above. By implication, the algorithms, FPSO supporting structure translates into optimal design, resulting in cost savings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 0027/ND-Noble Denton Guidelines for Marine Lifting Operations, March 2010.

  • AISC-ASD. (2023). Specification for the Design, Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings—Allowable Stress Design, 9th Edition.

  • AlHamaydeh, M., Barakat, S., & Nasif, O. (2017). Optimization of support structures for offshore wind turbines using genetic algorithm with domain-trimming. Mathematical Problems in Engineering., 2017, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • API RP 2A-WSD. (2000). Recommended practice for planning, designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design, 21st Edition.

  • Aydın, Z. (2022). Size, layout and tendon profile optimization of prestressed steel trusses using Jaya algorithm. Structures, 40, 284–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azizi, M., Ejlali, R. G., Mousavi Ghasemi, S. A., & Talatahari, S. (2019). Upgraded Whale Optimization Algorithm for fuzzy logic based vibration control of nonlinear steel structure. Engineering Structures, 192, 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaei, M., & Moharrami, H. (2022). Geometry and sizing optimization of steel gable frames with tapered members. Structures, 42, 575–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benzo, P. G., Pereira, J. M., & Sena-Cruz, J. (2022). Optimization of steel web core sandwich panel with genetic algorithm. Engineering Structures, 253, 113805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, K., Tai, K., Ng, E., & Muskulus, M. (2015). Optimization of offshore wind turbine support structures using an analytical gradient-based method. Energy Procedia, 80, 100–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicconi, P., Germani, M., Bondi, S., Zuliani, A., & Cagnacci, E. (2016). A design methodology to support the optimization of steel structures. Procedia CIRP, 50, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, C., Ping, Y., Gao, Y., Zheng, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022). Machine learning-aided multi-objective optimization of structures with hybrid braces—framework and case study. Engineering Structures, 269, 114808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, H., Iqbal, N., Van Staen, G., & De Backer, H. (2021). Structural optimization of rib-to-crossbeam joint in orthotropic steel decks. Engineering Structures, 248, 113208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FPSO Topside Structural Design Basis guidelines API standard 2000.

  • Fu, J., Wu, J., Dong, C., Xu, A., & Pi, Y. (2019). Optimization design of large span portal-rigid steel frame with tapered sections under wind-induced drift constraint. Engineering Structures, 194, 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghadimi, B., & Taghikhany, T. (2021). Dynamic response assessment of an offshore jacket platform with semi-active fuzzy-based controller: A case study. Ocean Engineering, 238, 109747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholizadeh, S., Hasançebi, O., Eser, H., & Koçkaya, O. (2022). Seismic collapse safety based optimization of steel Moment-Resisting frames. Structures, 45, 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, G., Raudberget, D., & Ström, M. (2016). Unveiling fundamental relationships in industrial product development. Procedia CIRP, 50, 204–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haji Mazdarani, M. J., Hoseini Vaez, S. R., Hosseini, P., & Fathali, M. A. (2023). Reliability-based layout optimization of concentrically braced in 3D steel frames. Structures, 47, 1094–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh, A., & Gholizadeh, S. (2019). Collapse-performance-aided design optimization of steel concentrically braced frames. Engineering Structures, 197, 109411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A. (2014a). Advances in metaheuristic algorithms for optimal design of structures. Springer International Publishing. 978-3-319-46173-1.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A. (2014b). Optimal structural analysis. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-470-03329-6.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., Biabani Hamedani, K., Milad Hosseini, S., & Bakhshpoori, T. (2020). Optimal design of planar steel frame structures utilizing meta-heuristic optimization algorithms. Structures, 25, 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Khayatazad, M. (2012). A new meta-heuristic method: Ray optimization. Computers & Structures, 112–113, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh, A., & Zaerreza, A. (2022). Reliability-based design optimization of the frame structures using the force method and SORA-DM framework. Structures, 45, 814–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemzadeh Azad, S., & Aminbakhsh, S. (2021). High-dimensional optimization of large-scale steel truss structures using guided stochastic search. Structures, 33, 1439–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmarec, S., & Hogreav, S. (2016). Improving design efforts and assembly efficency of rotor blade carries through modularization. Procedia CIRP, 50(2016), 76–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Chung, M., Kim, S., & Shin, D. H. (2021). Damage detection of catenary mooring line based on recurrent neural networks. Ocean Engineering, 227, 108898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan, A., Stolpe, M., & Njomo Wandji, W. (2019). Structural optimization based design of jacket type sub-structures for 10 MW offshore wind turbines. Ocean Engineering, 172, 629–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ABS Rules for Building and Classing Floating Production Installations, 2013.

  • Shan, W., Ding, Y., & Zhou, J. (2022). Automatic structural optimization design using sensitivity-based method. Structures, 46, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabeshpour, M. R., & Fatemi, M. (2020). Optimum arrangement of braces in jacket platform based on strength and ductility. Marine Structures, 71, 102734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomei, V. (2023). The effect of joint stiffness on optimization design strategies for gridshells: The role of rigid, semi-rigid and hinged joints. Structures, 48, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunca, O. (2022). Design of buckling restrained steel braces using application programming interface between simulation and discrete optimization. Structures, 43, 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Woudenberg, T. R., & van der Meer, F. P. (2021). A grouping method for optimization of steel skeletal structures by applying a combinatorial search algorithm based on a fully stressed design. Engineering Structures, 249, 113299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villalba, D., París, J., Couceiro, I., Colominas, I., & Navarrina, F. (2022). Topology optimization of structures considering minimum weight and stress constraints by using the Overweight Approach. Engineering Structures, 273, 115071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishnuraj, K., Janardhanan, S., & Sandeep, T. N. (2018). Design optimization of water injection module of topside facility of an FPSO. International Journal of Structural Mechanics and Finite Elements, 112, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, A., Li, S., Fu, J., Misra, A., & Zhao, R. (2023). A hybrid method for optimization of frame structures with good constructability. Engineering Structures, 276, 115338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P., Li, J., Gan, Y., Zhang, J., Qi, X., Le, C., & Ding, H. (2020). Bearing capacity and load transfer of brace topological in offshore wind turbine jacket structure. Ocean Engineering, 199, 107037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S., Bi, C., & Sun, Z. (2021). Engineering analysis of the dynamic characteristics of an electrical jacket platform of an offshore wind farm under seismic loads. Applied Ocean Research, 112, 102692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no funding or specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dr. Vishwanath Karad MIT World Peace University, Pune, India

    Adinath Yadhav & Mrudula Kulkarni

Authors
  1. Adinath Yadhav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mrudula Kulkarni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adinath Yadhav.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

We declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by Springer, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadhav, A., Kulkarni, M. Optimal design of FPSO topside module for in-place, lift and weighing conditions utilizing meta-heuristic optimization algorithms. Asian J Civ Eng 24, 3055–3070 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00694-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00694-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation