Skip to main content

Tensile behavior of grouted sleeve couplers connecting steel bars with transition splicing

Abstract

Grouted sleeve (GS) couplers have been widely used in precast concrete industry in non-seismic regions. However, for seismic applications, previous studies on precast reinforced concrete (RC) columns containing GS couplers showed disrupted plastic hinge formation in the sleeve region and thus limited ductility. Recently, a connection design detail was proposed and it showed significant improvement in ductility using shifted plastic hinge (SPH) mechanism where transition splicing was used (GS connecting steel bars with different sizes) and high-strength steel reinforcement was used in the capacity-protected element (such as footing). This study investigates experimentally the tensile behavior of GS couplers connecting steel bars with transition splicing and different grades intended for use in SPH applications. Nine GS specimens were assembled and tested. The testing parameters were GS coupler size, steel bar diameter, and transition splicing index. Results showed that all GS couplers fully developed the ultimate stress of the steel bars and the failure mode was bar rupture away from the coupler region which is a favorable mode. Also, it was observed that the strain within the coupler region and strain in the normal-strength steel bar (Gr. 420) were related by a ratio which was approximately 1.0 and 0.5 within the linear elastic and nonlinear inelastic zones, respectively, for all different specimen sizes. Furthermore, the results revealed that transition index had no effect on the failure mode, and showed insignificant effect on the stress-strain behavior of the GS couplers. Based on the study results, it is recommended to quantify the strain ratios experimentally for the selected assembly size since these ratios are a crucial part in designing GS precast columns with SPH methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Abdel-Fattah, B., & Wight, J. (1987). Study of moving beam plastic hinging zones for earthquake-resistant design of reinforced concrete buildings. ACI Structural Journal, 84(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  2. AC-133. (2010). Acceptance criteria for mechanical connector systems for steel reinforcing bars. International Code Council Evaluation Service, Whittier, CA.

  3. ACI-318. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, Michigan, US.

  4. Alimirzaei, S., Mohammadimehr, M., & Tounsi, A. (2019). Nonlinear analysis of viscoelastic micro-composite beam with geometrical imperfection using FEM: MSGT electro-magneto-elastic bending, buckling and vibration solutions. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 71(5), 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Jelawy, H. (2017). Shifted plastic hinge column connections using grouted sleeves for accelerated bridge construction. PhD dissertation, University of Central Florida.

  6. Al-Jelawy, H., Haber, Z., & Mackie, K. (2014). Seismic performance of grouted splice precast column joints with shifted plastic hinge mechanisms. In: 2014 National accelerated bridge construction conference, pp. 3–5.

  7. Al-Jelawy, H., Haber, Z., & Mackie, K. (2017). Grouted splice precast column connections with shifted plastic hinging. In: 16th World conference on earthquake engineering, pp. 9–13.

  8. Al-Jelawy, H., Mackie, K., & Haber, Z. (2018a). Experimental and numerical studies on precast bridge columns with shifted plastic hinging. In: Eleventh US national conference on earthquake engineering, pp. 25–29.

  9. Al-Jelawy, H., Mackie, K., & Haber, Z. (2018b). Shifted plastic hinging for grouted sleeve column connections. ACI Structural Journal, 115(4), 1101–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ameli, M., Brown, D. N., Parks, J. E., & Pantelides, C. P. (2016). Seismic column-to-footing connections using grouted splice sleeves. ACI Structural Journal, 113(5), 1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ASTM. (2015a). A1034: standard test methods for testing mechanical splices for steel reinforcing bars. ASTM International.

  12. ASTM. (2015b). A370: standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM International.

  13. ASTM. (2015c). E8: standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International.

  14. Bendenia, N., Zidour, M., Bousahla, A. A., Bourada, F., Tounsi, A., Benrahou, K. H., et al. (2020). Deflections, stresses and free vibration studies of FG-CNT reinforced sandwich plates resting on Pasternak elastic foundation. Computers and Concrete, 26(3), 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bourada, F., Bousahla, A. A., Tounsi, A., Bedia, E., Mahmoud, S., Benrahou, K. H., & Tounsi, A. (2020). Stability and dynamic analyses of SW-CNT reinforced concrete beam resting on elastic-foundation. Computers and Concrete, 25(6), 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bousahla, A. A., Bourada, F., Mahmoud, S., Tounsi, A., Algarni, A., Bedia, E., & Tounsi, A. (2020). Buckling and dynamic behavior of the simply supported CNT-RC beams using an integral-first shear deformation theory. Computers and Concrete, 25(2), 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  17. CT670. (2011). California TEST 670: method of tests for mechanical and welded reinforcing steel splices. California Department of Transportation.

  18. Draoui, A., Zidour, M., Tounsi, A., & Adim, B. (2019). Static and dynamic behavior of nanotubes-reinforced sandwich plates using (FSDT). Journal of Nano Research, 57, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Einea, A., Yamane, T., & Tadros, M. K. (1995). Grout-filled pipe splices for precast concrete construction. PCI Journal, 40(1), 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Galunic, B., Bertero, V. V., & Popov, E. P. (1977). An approach for improving seismic behavior of reinforced concrete interior joints. National Science Foundation: Tech. rep.

  21. Haber, Z., Mackie, K., & Al-Jelawy, H. (2017). Testing and analysis of precast columns with grouted sleeve connections and shifted plastic hinging. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 22(10), 04017078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haber, Z. B., Saiidi, M. S., & Sanders, D. H. (2014). Seismic performance of precast columns with mechanically spliced column-footing connections. ACI Structural Journal, 111(3), 639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Haber, Z. B., Saiidi, M. S., & Sanders, D. H. (2015). Behavior and simplified modeling of mechanical reinforcing bar splices. ACI Structural Journal, 112(2), 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ling, J. H., Rahman, A. B. A., Ibrahim, I. S., & Hamid, Z. A. (2012). Behaviour of grouted pipe splice under incremental tensile load. Construction and Building Materials, 33, 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Medani, M., Benahmed, A., Zidour, M., Heireche, H., Tounsi, A., Bousahla, A. A., et al. (2019). Static and dynamic behavior of (FG-CNT) reinforced porous sandwich plate using energy principle. Steel and Composite Structures, 32(5), 595–610.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Noureddine, I. (1996). Plastic energy absorption capacity of No. 18 reinforcing bar splices under monotonic loading. Master’s thesis, California State University.

  27. Paulson, C., & Hanson, J. (1991). Fatigue behavior of welded and mechanical splices in reinforcing steel. NCHRP Report, pp. 10–35.

  28. Rowell, S., Grey, C., Woodson, S., & Hager, K. (2009). High strain-rate testing of mechanical couplers. DTIC Document: Tech. rep.

  29. Tazarv, M. (2014). Next generation of bridge columns for accelerated bridge construction in high seismic zones. PhD thesis, University of Nevada, Reno.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by Splice Sleeve Japan and North America; their support and assistance are greatly appreciated. The author expresses special thanks to MMFX Steel Corporation for providing high strength reinforcing bars.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haider M. Al-Jelawy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Jelawy, H.M. Tensile behavior of grouted sleeve couplers connecting steel bars with transition splicing. Asian J Civ Eng 22, 1011–1017 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00361-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grouted sleeve
  • Precast connection
  • Ductility
  • Tensile test
  • Seismic regions
  • Accelerated bridge construction