The normative requirements on seismic performance of flexural compressed columns are translated through the criteria of stiffness, strength and ductility. It is well known that FRP external confinement is a very effective retrofitting technique for strengthening reinforced concrete columns (RC) subjected to static or seismic loads. A parametric study illustrating the influence of the main parameters, such as number of CFRP layers, concrete strength, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, axial load ratio and CFRP reinforcement ratio on the sectional behaviour and the structural slenderness on the global behaviour was conducted. The nonlinear (NL) sectional analysis based on fibre elements was conducted, while the NL global response was obtained using the NL Pushover analysis. The investigation obtained results permit to highlight the influence of the considered parameters through the evaluation of the registered strength and deformation gains. It was found that axial load and concrete strength are the most influencing the sectional performances despite the amount of CFRP wrapping. The NL RC columns behaviour depends intimately on the slenderness, the axial load and the CFRP ratio. The NL sectional and global adopted models were then calibrated with experimental results found within specific literature. It was concluded that the numerical NL models can retrace satisfactory the NL behaviour. More relevant conclusions regarding the conjugate influence of the CFRP sheets and the considered parameters were formulated and practical recommendations for the use of the CFRP external wrapping were established.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Availability of data and materials
Experimental data sharing is not applicable to this article as the data used were provided from articles found in the literature (Ozcan et al. (2008), Wu et al. 2013) and no new experimental data were created in this study. Concerning the numerical data supporting the findings of this study the authors confirm that it is available within the article.
SAP2000 Ultimate V17 Laboratory of Civil engineering LGC-University of Badji Mokhtar Annaba—BP 12- 23,100 Annaba, Algeria.
ATC-40 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, vol. 1 (ATC- 40), Report No. SSC 96–01, Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.
CALTRANS. (2013). Seismic design criteria. Version, 1, 7.
Casas, J. R., & Chambi, J. L. (2014). Partial safety factors for CFRP-wrapped bridge piers: model assessment and calibration. Composite Structures, 118, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.032.
Cascardi, A., Micelli, F., & Aiello, M. A. (2017). An artificial neural networks model for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP-confined concrete circular columns. Engineering Structures, 140, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.047.
Comert, M., Demir, C., Ghatte, H. F., Ilki, A. (2014). Seismic performance of full-scale FRP confined sub-standard columns subjected to high axial load. In: 7th International conference on FRP composites in civil engineering (CICE 2014), International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC), Vancouver, BC, Canada.
CSI SAP 2000. Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.
Eid, R., & Paultre, P. (2017). Compressive behavior of FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 132, 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.052.
Fardis, M. N., & Khalili, H. H. (1982). FRP-encased concrete as a structural material. Magazine of Concrete Research, 34(121), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.19188.8.131.52.
Ghanem, S. Y. (2016). Circular RC Columns Partially Confined with FRP". Theses and Dissertations-Civil Engineering. Paper 38. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/ce_etds/38.
Gu, D.-S., Wu, Y.-F., Wu, G., & Wu, Z. (2012). Plastic hinge analysis of FRP confined circular concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 27(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.056.
Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A., Darvishvand, H. R., Asadi, S., & Pourhasan, M. (2020). A comparative study on the implementation of carbon and glass fibers wrappings to improve the compressive strength and seismic behavior of concrete. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00285-5.
Inel, M., Ozmen, H. B., & Bilgin, H. (2008). Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 30(2), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.012.
Issa, M. A., Alrousan, R. Z., & Issa, M. A. (2009). Experimental and parametric study of circular short columns confined with CFRP composites. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2009)13:2(135).
Lam, L., & Teng, J. G. (2002). Strength Models for Fiber-Reinforced Plastic-Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(5), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:5(612).
Lam, L., & Teng, J. G. (2003). Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 17(6–7), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-0618(03)00045-x.
Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng, 114(8), 1804–1826.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., Lim, J. C., & Vincent, T. (2013). FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models. Eng. Structures, 49(1068), 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/Engstruct.2012.06.01.
Ozcan, O., Binici, B., & Ozcebe, G. (2008). Improving seismic performance of deficient reinforced concrete columns using carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. Engineering Structures, 30(6), 1632–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.013.
Parvin, A., & Brighton, D. (2014). FRP Composites Strengthening of Concrete Columns under Various Loading Conditions. Polymers, 6(4), 1040–1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6041040.
Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Pham, T. M., & Hadi, M. N. S. (2014). Confinement model for FRP confined normal- and high-strength concrete circular columns. Construction and Building Materials, 69, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.036.
Teng, J. G., Jiang, T., Lam, L., & Luo, Y. Z. (2009). Refinement of a design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000012.
Van Cao, V., & Quoc Nguyen, T. (2019). Effects of CFRP/GFRP flexural retrofitting on reducing seismic damage of reinforced concrete frames: a comparative study. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00173-7.
Wu, Z. M., Hou, D. X., & Dong, W. (2013). Investigation on seismic behavior of cfrp retrofitted reinforced concrete column with partial deterioration: Experimental and numerical. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(6), 703–707.
Youssf, O., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2015). Displacement and plastic hinge length of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 101, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026.
Yuan, F., Wu, Y.-F., & Li, C.-Q. (2016). Modelling plastic hinge of FRP-confined RC columns. Engineering Structures, 131, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.018.
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author, states that there is no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Gahmousse, Z., Djebbar, MS. & Djebbar, N. Seismic performance of RC columns retrofitted by CFRP wrapping ‘Study of the influencing parameters’. Asian J Civ Eng 22, 911–928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00354-3
- FRP confinement
- Bridge piers
- Seismic retrofitting
- Pushover analysis
- Plastic hinges