Skip to main content

Seismic performance of RC columns retrofitted by CFRP wrapping ‘Study of the influencing parameters’

Abstract

The normative requirements on seismic performance of flexural compressed columns are translated through the criteria of stiffness, strength and ductility. It is well known that FRP external confinement is a very effective retrofitting technique for strengthening reinforced concrete columns (RC) subjected to static or seismic loads. A parametric study illustrating the influence of the main parameters, such as number of CFRP layers, concrete strength, longitudinal reinforcement ratio, axial load ratio and CFRP reinforcement ratio on the sectional behaviour and the structural slenderness on the global behaviour was conducted. The nonlinear (NL) sectional analysis based on fibre elements was conducted, while the NL global response was obtained using the NL Pushover analysis. The investigation obtained results permit to highlight the influence of the considered parameters through the evaluation of the registered strength and deformation gains. It was found that axial load and concrete strength are the most influencing the sectional performances despite the amount of CFRP wrapping. The NL RC columns behaviour depends intimately on the slenderness, the axial load and the CFRP ratio. The NL sectional and global adopted models were then calibrated with experimental results found within specific literature. It was concluded that the numerical NL models can retrace satisfactory the NL behaviour. More relevant conclusions regarding the conjugate influence of the CFRP sheets and the considered parameters were formulated and practical recommendations for the use of the CFRP external wrapping were established.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Availability of data and materials

Experimental data sharing is not applicable to this article as the data used were provided from articles found in the literature (Ozcan et al. (2008), Wu et al. 2013) and no new experimental data were created in this study. Concerning the numerical data supporting the findings of this study the authors confirm that it is available within the article.

Code availability

SAP2000 Ultimate V17 Laboratory of Civil engineering LGC-University of Badji Mokhtar Annaba—BP 12- 23,100 Annaba, Algeria.

References

  1. ATC-40 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, vol. 1 (ATC- 40), Report No. SSC 96–01, Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council.

  2. CALTRANS. (2013). Seismic design criteria. Version, 1, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Casas, J. R., & Chambi, J. L. (2014). Partial safety factors for CFRP-wrapped bridge piers: model assessment and calibration. Composite Structures, 118, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cascardi, A., Micelli, F., & Aiello, M. A. (2017). An artificial neural networks model for the prediction of the compressive strength of FRP-confined concrete circular columns. Engineering Structures, 140, 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Comert, M., Demir, C., Ghatte, H. F., Ilki, A. (2014). Seismic performance of full-scale FRP confined sub-standard columns subjected to high axial load. In: 7th International conference on FRP composites in civil engineering (CICE 2014), International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC), Vancouver, BC, Canada.

  6. CSI SAP 2000. Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkeley, California.

  7. Eid, R., & Paultre, P. (2017). Compressive behavior of FRP-confined reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 132, 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fardis, M. N., & Khalili, H. H. (1982). FRP-encased concrete as a structural material. Magazine of Concrete Research, 34(121), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1982.34.121.191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghanem, S. Y. (2016). Circular RC Columns Partially Confined with FRP". Theses and Dissertations-Civil Engineering. Paper 38. http://uknowledge.uky.edu/ce_etds/38.

  10. Gu, D.-S., Wu, Y.-F., Wu, G., & Wu, Z. (2012). Plastic hinge analysis of FRP confined circular concrete columns. Construction and Building Materials, 27(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haj Seiyed Taghia, S. A., Darvishvand, H. R., Asadi, S., & Pourhasan, M. (2020). A comparative study on the implementation of carbon and glass fibers wrappings to improve the compressive strength and seismic behavior of concrete. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00285-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Inel, M., Ozmen, H. B., & Bilgin, H. (2008). Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 30(2), 412–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.04.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Issa, M. A., Alrousan, R. Z., & Issa, M. A. (2009). Experimental and parametric study of circular short columns confined with CFRP composites. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2009)13:2(135).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lam, L., & Teng, J. G. (2002). Strength Models for Fiber-Reinforced Plastic-Confined Concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 128(5), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:5(612).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam, L., & Teng, J. G. (2003). Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 17(6–7), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0950-0618(03)00045-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress–strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng, 114(8), 1804–1826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozbakkaloglu, T., Lim, J. C., & Vincent, T. (2013). FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models. Eng. Structures, 49(1068), 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/Engstruct.2012.06.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozcan, O., Binici, B., & Ozcebe, G. (2008). Improving seismic performance of deficient reinforced concrete columns using carbon fiber-reinforced polymers. Engineering Structures, 30(6), 1632–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.10.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parvin, A., & Brighton, D. (2014). FRP Composites Strengthening of Concrete Columns under Various Loading Conditions. Polymers, 6(4), 1040–1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym6041040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Pham, T. M., & Hadi, M. N. S. (2014). Confinement model for FRP confined normal- and high-strength concrete circular columns. Construction and Building Materials, 69, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Teng, J. G., Jiang, T., Lam, L., & Luo, Y. Z. (2009). Refinement of a design-oriented stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 13(4), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Cao, V., & Quoc Nguyen, T. (2019). Effects of CFRP/GFRP flexural retrofitting on reducing seismic damage of reinforced concrete frames: a comparative study. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00173-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, Z. M., Hou, D. X., & Dong, W. (2013). Investigation on seismic behavior of cfrp retrofitted reinforced concrete column with partial deterioration: Experimental and numerical. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 5(6), 703–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Youssf, O., ElGawady, M. A., & Mills, J. E. (2015). Displacement and plastic hinge length of FRP-confined circular reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Structures, 101, 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yuan, F., Wu, Y.-F., & Li, C.-Q. (2016). Modelling plastic hinge of FRP-confined RC columns. Engineering Structures, 131, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Please review the submission guidelines from the journal whether statements are mandatory.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zakaria Gahmousse.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author, states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gahmousse, Z., Djebbar, MS. & Djebbar, N. Seismic performance of RC columns retrofitted by CFRP wrapping ‘Study of the influencing parameters’. Asian J Civ Eng 22, 911–928 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-021-00354-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • FRP confinement
  • Concrete
  • Bridge piers
  • Seismic retrofitting
  • Pushover analysis
  • Plastic hinges