Advertisement

Seismic vulnerability assessment using the macroseismic method proposed in the framework of Risk-UE project based on the recommendations of the Algerian seismic code RPA99/Version 2003

  • Hadi TaibiEmail author
  • Mourad Ait Youcef
  • Mourad Khellafi
Original Paper
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

In the context of drawing up strategic seismic prevention plans, the study of seismic vulnerability and the evaluation of fragility curves can help us to better know the state of the structures under study and consequently to decide on the necessary intervention and treatment they require. The present study represents a contribution to the evaluation of seismic vulnerability using the macroseismic approach within the framework of Risk-EU project, and based on the recommendations of the Algerian regulation RPA99/Version 2003. A calculation tool, entitled “Estimation of Fragility Curves”, was developed under MATLAB to estimate the vulnerability index value and to plot the mean damage curve as well as the fragility curves for aim to assess the likelihood of damage that the structure under study might suffer in the event of an earthquake and then to classify that structure.

Keywords

Vulnerability Seismic behavior Damage Fragility Macroseismic intensity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to present their thanks to Dr. Belheouane for his deep in the evaluation of seismic vulnerability in Algeria and his Ph.D. thesis that helped us to carry out this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aliche, A., Hammoum, H., & Bouzelha, K. (2019). Mecano-reliability analysis applied to RC tank under seismic loads according to the Algerian seismic standard. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-00113-x.Google Scholar
  2. Basaglia, A., Aprile, A., Spacone, E., & Pilla, F. (2018). Performance-based seismic risk assessment of urban systems. International Journal of Architectural Heritage.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1503371.Google Scholar
  3. Belheouane, F.I. (2006). Détermination de l’indice de vulnérabilité pour les bâtiments en béton armé. Master thesis. Blida: Saad Dahlab University.Google Scholar
  4. Belheouane, F. I., & Bensaibi, M. (2013). Assessment of vulnerability curves using vulnerability index method for reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 7(6), 485–488.Google Scholar
  5. Boukri, M., et al. (2017). Seismic vulnerability appraisal according to the Algerian building context. Earthquake Resistant Engineering Structures.  https://doi.org/10.2495/ERES170101.Google Scholar
  6. Bounif, A., et al. (2003). Seismic source study of the 1989, October 29, Chenoua (Algeria) earthquake from aftershocks, broad-band and strong ground motion records. Annals of Geophysics.  https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-4370.Google Scholar
  7. C.G.S. (2003). Règlement Parasismique Algérien RPA99V2003. Algeria, Centre National de Recherche Appliquée en Génie Parasismique.Google Scholar
  8. Chieffo, N., & Formisano, A. (2019a). Geo-Hazard-based approach for the estimation of seismic vulnerability and damage scenarios of the old city of Senerchia (Avellino, Italy). Geosciences.  https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9020059.Google Scholar
  9. Chieffo, N., & Formisano, A. (2019b). The influence of Geo-Hazard effects on the physical vulnerability assessment of the built heritage: an application in a district of Naples. Buildings.  https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010026.Google Scholar
  10. Chieffo, N., Formisano, A., & Ferreira, T. M. (2019a). Damage scenario-based approach and retrofitting strategies for seismic risk mitigation: an application to the historical Centre of Sant’Antimo (Italy). European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1596164.Google Scholar
  11. Chieffo, N., Mosoarca, M., Formisano, A., & Apostol, I. (2019b). Seismic vulnerability assessment and loss estimation of an urban district of Timisoara. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/10/102070.Google Scholar
  12. De Silva, S., et al. (2018). Assessment method for seismic vulnerability of old masonry buildings in Sri Lanka. Procedia Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.009.Google Scholar
  13. Djaalali, F. (2013). Détermination des courbes de vulnérabilité pour le bâti en maçonnerie de la capitale Alger (Algérie). Ph. D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Travaux Publics-Alger.Google Scholar
  14. El-Betar, S. A. (2017). Seismic performance of existing RC framed buildings. HBRC Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.06.001.Google Scholar
  15. Formisano, A., Chieffo, N., & Mosoarca, M. (2017). Seismic vulnerability and damage speedy estimation of an urban sector within the municipality of San Potito Sannitico (Caserta, Italy). The Open Civil Engineering Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501711011106.Google Scholar
  16. Fumo, M., Formisano, A., Sibilio, G., & Violano, A. (2018). Energy and seismic recovering of ancient hamlets: the case of Baia e Latina. Sustainability.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082831.Google Scholar
  17. Giovinazzi, S., Lagomarsino, S. (2006) Vulnérability méthods and damage scenario for seismic risk analysis as support to retrofit strategies: an European perspective. NZSEE conference. New Zeland. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/439. Accessed 20 July 2018.
  18. Grünthal, G. (1998). European macroseismic scale 1998. Luxembourg: Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie.Google Scholar
  19. Guéguen, P., Clotaire, M., & LeCorre, L. (2007). A simplified approach for vulnerability assessment in moderate-to-low seismic hazard regions: application to Grenoble (France). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9036-3.Google Scholar
  20. Hamed, F. Z. B., Rahal, D. D., & Rahal, F. (2013). Seismic risk assessment of Algerian buildings in urban area. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management.  https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2012.744772.Google Scholar
  21. Iman, M., Jong, W. H., Kazem, S., Shahrokh, S., & Bahareh, N. (2017). Assessment of seismic vulnerability of steel and RC moment buildings using HAZUS and statistical methodologies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2698932.Google Scholar
  22. Imene Belheouane, F., & Bensaibi, M. (2014). Vulnerability curves of reinforced concrete buildings. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(19), 77–80.Google Scholar
  23. Irwansyah, E., & Hartati, S. (2014). Assessment of building damage hazard caused by earthquake: integration of FNN and GIS. IERI Procedia.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ieri.2014.09.077.Google Scholar
  24. Kassem, M. M., Mohamed Nazri, F., Wei, L. J., et al. (2019). Seismic fragility assessment for moment-resisting concrete frame with setback under repeated earthquakes. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00119-z.Google Scholar
  25. Maio, R., et al. (2016). Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: case study of the old city centre of Faro. Portugal. Journal of Risk Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.988285.Google Scholar
  26. Milutinovic, Z.V., & Trendafiloski, G.S. (2003). RISK-UE, an advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns, WP4: vulnerability of current buildings. European Commission.Google Scholar
  27. Rapone, D., et al. (2018). Seismic vulnerability assessment of historic centers: description of a predictive method and application to the case study of Scanno (Abruzzi, Italy). International Journal of Architectural Heritage.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1503373.Google Scholar
  28. Tadjer, K., & Bensaibi, M. (2017). Earthquake risk assessment of Blida (Algeria) using GIS. Energy Procedia.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.266.Google Scholar
  29. Wahyuni, E. (2015). Vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete building post earthquake. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2015.07.087.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hadi Taibi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mourad Ait Youcef
    • 2
  • Mourad Khellafi
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Development in Mechanic and MaterialsUniversity Zian Achor of DjelfaDjelfaAlgeria
  2. 2.University Zian Achor of DjelfaDjelfaAlgeria

Personalised recommendations