Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using BIM to propose building alternatives towards lower consumption of electric power in Iraq

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the reasons for the dissatisfaction of the Iraqi people with the privatization of electricity due to the significant increase in electricity bills. It examines the main factors that affect the energy demand in the Iraqi houses for cooling and heating by modeling and analyzing existing buildings using Building Information Modeling (BIM). The results of energy consumption from BIM were compared with real consumption of the houses which was obtained from the bills to investigate the reality of the results. The simulation results were well-matched with the real data. Then three buildings were modeled and analyzed with alternative materials for roofs and walls by considering the cost of construction (CC), life cycle energy cost (LCEC) and carbon emission (CE) for each alternative. The best alternative is selected according to the opinion of the occupants, which was achieved by a questionnaire and the data obtained from the BIM models. The questionnaire data and the simulation results were analyzed by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique. The obtained results were represented in a framework for selecting the best materials for constructing walls and roofs. For walls, it was found that rock block is the best since the final weight from AHP results was 0.5371, and Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Block (AAC block) rib slab is the best for roof with a final weight equal to 0.4218. The final model has LCEC of five times less than the original unit, but CC were equal and CE was decreased from 5 ton/year to less than 0.8 ton/year in the suggested alternative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Autodesk, Inc. (2011). Building information modeling for sustainable design. San Rafael: Autodesk Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, C. M., Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., & Sacks, R. (2011). BIM handbook: a guide to building information modeling for owners, managers, designers, engineers, and contractors. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filipovic, A. (2006). Impact of privatization on economic growth. Undergraduate Economic Review, 2(1), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, T., & Kiviniemi, A. (2008). Sustainable building and BIM. In: Proceedings of the 2008 world sustainable building conference, 21–25 September, Melbourne, Australia.

  • Ibahim, A., Mansor, A., & Kaduri, J. (2017). Selection of best house construction materials for roofs and walls regarding cost, weight, thermal insulation and mechanical properties. Engineering and Technology Journal, 35(1), 248–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim, A. (2010). Privatization and the need to transform the Iraqi economy. Qadisiyah Journal of Administrative and Economic Sciences, 12(2), 159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, T., Hänninen, R., & Karola, A. (2007). Benefits of BIM in the thermal performance management. In: Proceedings of the building simulation.‏

  • Liu, Sha. (2015). sustainable building design optimization using building information modeling. ICCREM, 2015, 326–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahjoob, A., & Abed, M. M. (2015). Assessing BIM integration with sustainable requirement for buildings construction.‏ International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20175756

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlovskis, M., Antucheviciene, J., & Migilinskas, D. (2017). Assessment of buildings redevelopment possibilities using MCDM and BIM techniques. Procedia Engineering, 172, 846–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, K., & Ankrah, N. (2008). Construction cost management: learning from case studies. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. (1991). Fundamentals of decision making and priority. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustinovičius, L., Popov, V., & Migilinskas, D. (2005). Automated management, modeling and choosing of economically effective variant in construction. Transport and Telecommunication, 6(1), 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlahinić-Dizdarević, N. (2011). The effects of privatization in electricity sector: the case of southeast European countries. Öffentliche Daseinsvorsorge in Deutschland und Ostmitteleuropa zwischen Daseinsvorsorge und Wettbewerb. Kovac, Stuttgart: Verlag Dr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. D., & Fan, Q. (2013). Building information modelling (BIM) for sustainable building design. Facilities, 31(3/4), 138–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hafeth I. Naji.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naji, H.I., Mahmood, M. & Mohammad, H.E. Using BIM to propose building alternatives towards lower consumption of electric power in Iraq. Asian J Civ Eng 20, 669–679 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00134-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00134-0

Keywords

Navigation