Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic fragility assessment for moment-resisting concrete frame with setback under repeated earthquakes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research study was carried out to analyse the seismic behaviour of ten types of six-storey moment-resisting concrete frames, which were one regular frame and nine setback frames with different building configurations. In this analysis, the setback buildings were mainly studied because they have become increasingly popular in modern multi-storey building construction due to their functional and aesthetic architecture. Incremental dynamics analysis (IDA) was performed on these frames under three sets of repeated ground motion records. Based on the IDA curve, life safety (LS) performance level was considered as the main guideline to develop the fragility curves. The maximum inter-storey drift percentages at each storey level, for all frames and location of plastic hinges for each frame, were clearly determined through IDA. From the fragility curve results, the probability of reaching or exceeding the life safety performance state was determined. The regular frame showed the lowest probability as compared to other frames. Therefore, it is known that the building configuration of frames affects the building’s seismic performance, and thus it should be considered in the building’s seismic design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiswarya, S., & Mohan, N. (2014). Vulnerability analysis by the development of fragility curves. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), 11(2), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amadio, C., Fragiacomo, M., & Rajgelj, S. (2003). The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32(2), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, A., & Asadi, P. (2013). Probabilistic evaluation of seismic design parameters of RC frames based on fragility curves. Scientia Iranica, 20(2), 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • BSI. (2004a). BS EN 1992-1. Eurocode 2, Design of concrete structures Part 1-1–General rules and rules for buildings (including NA). London: British Standards Institution.

  • BSI. (2004b). BS EN 1998-1. Eurocode 8, Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. BSI London, UK.

  • FEMA-273. (1997). NEHRP Guidelines for Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Washington, D.C.: Building Seismic Safety Council, FEMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-356. (2000). Commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA-356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghobarah, A. (2001). Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development. Engineering Structures, 23(8), 878–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, C. A., Haselton, C. B., Mitrani-Reiser, J., Beck, J. L., Deierlein, G. G., Porter, K. A., et al. (2007). Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36(13), 1973–1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, C. B., Liel, A. B., Dean, B. S., Chou, J. H., & Deierlein, G. G. (2007). Seismic collapse safety and behavior of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings. Structural Engineering Research Frontiers, 32(14), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Beskos, D. E. (2009). Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 31(11), 2744–2755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzigeorgiou, G. D., & Liolios, A. A. (2010). Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(10), 1010–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBC. (2000). International Building Code, International Code Council. Inc. (formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI), 1–796.

  • Ibrahim, Y. E., & El-Shami, M. M. (2011). Seismic fragility curves for mid-rise reinforced concrete frames in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The IES Journal Part A: Civil & Structural Engineering, 4(4), 213–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovvuri, N. R. (2015). Effect of setback on RC framed buildings in fundamental period. International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science, 3(5), 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G., & Baker, J. W. (2009). Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Structural Safety, 31(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, K., & Stojadinović, B. (2003). Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Berkeley, 16, 1–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manafizad, A. N., Pradhan, B., & Abdullahi, S. (2016). Estimation of peak ground acceleration (PGA) for Peninsular Malaysia using geospatial approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 37(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazri, F. M., & Alexander, N. A. (2014). Exploring the relationship between earthquake intensity and building damage using single and multi-degree of freedom models. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 41(4), 343–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivedi, P. V., Sheth, R. K., & Soni, P. D. (2016). Performance evaluation of R.C. moment resisting symmetric frame using nonlinear dynamic analysis. Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 4(1), 177–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • UBC. (1997). Structural design requirement, Division IV. Earthquake Design, 2(1), 9–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2010). Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vazurkar, U., & Chaudhari, D. (2016). Development of fragility curves for RC buildings. International Journal of Engineering Research, 5(3), 591–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vision 2000. (1995). Conceptual framework for performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Vol. 2. Structural Engineers Association of California.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia under the Research University (Individual) Grant Scheme (8014080) and RU Grant of University of Malaya (GPF026A-2018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadzli Mohamed Nazri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kassem, M.M., Mohamed Nazri, F., Wei, L.J. et al. Seismic fragility assessment for moment-resisting concrete frame with setback under repeated earthquakes. Asian J Civ Eng 20, 465–477 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00119-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00119-z

Keywords

Navigation