Skip to main content
Log in

Design strategies for fragment and projectile penetration into steel and concrete structural elements using CONWEP

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Designers who design structures to mitigate against blast loadings (Remennikov 2007) have another duty and that is to design for the effects of fragmentation not only caused from bulk explosives, but also impact from projectiles. Impact causes damage to a structure and inevitably results in debris from penetration and perforation (breach) of the structural elements. This debris is in fact the result of the damage outcome to a structure either from the blast loading or projectile impact. Fragmentation (Bangash 2006) is the end result of the blast waves impacting the structural elements resulting in scabbing and spall both of which manifest themselves in the production of fragmentation. This fragmentation is propelled outwards at velocity causing supplementary damage to the structure, adjoining structures and individuals caught near the fragmentation. Those designing for fragmentation must consider many parameters from the geometry of the impacted structural element, to the velocity of the fragments, the weight of the fragments and the range of the fragments. As has been said the fragments cause damage and the designers overall duty is to design to mitigate against damage and death or injury to individuals. The pool of worldwide knowledge on this topic is growing exponentially particularly as the need arises with weapons of high velocity and sophisticated projectiles of extreme lethality and range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baera, C., Szilagyi, H., Mircea, C., Criel, P., & de Belie, N. (2016). Concrete structures under impact loading: general aspects. Urbanism. Arhitectura. Constructii, 7, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., Cox, P., Kulesz, J., Strehlow, R., & Westine, P. (2012). Explosion hazards and evaluation. Amstedam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., Westine, P. S. & Bessey, R. L. (1971). Blast fields about rockets and recoilless rifles. DTIC Document.

  • Balden, V., & Nurick, G. (2005). Numerical simulation of the post-failure motion of steel plates subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32, 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangash, T. (2006). Explosion-resistant buildings: Design, analysis, and case studies. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulson, P. S. (2002). Explosive loading of engineering structures. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defence, U. D. O. (2008). UFC 3-340-02 Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. In Defence, U. D. O. (ed.).

  • Fragaszy, R. J. & Taylor, T. A. 1989. Centrifuge modeling of projectile penetration in granular soils. Washington State Univ Pullman Dept of Civil And Environmental Engineering.

  • Hartley, S., Mcdonald, J., Suzuki, D., Swartz, D. & Kleiber, J. (2016). Laser sight for rocket launcher. Google Patents.

  • Hetherington J, Smith P (2014) Blast and ballistic loading of structures. CRC Press

  • Hill, R., Storakers, B. & Zdunek, A. (1989). A theoretical study of the Brinell hardness test. In Proceedings of the royal society of London a: Mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 1989 (pp. 301–330). The Royal Society.

  • Hyde, D. (1991). CONWEP: Conventional weapons effects program. USA: US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.

  • Kennedy, J. (1970). Gurney energy of explosives: Estimation of the velocity and impulse imparted to driven metal.

  • Leblanc, J., Shukla, A., Rousseau, C., & Bogdanovich, A. (2007). Shock loading of three-dimensional woven composite materials. Composite Structures, 79, 344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen, J. (2002). Dynamic behaviour of concrete structures subjected to blast and fragment impacts.

  • Leppänen, J. (2005). Experiments and numerical analyses of blast and fragment impacts on concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31, 843–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Hao, H. (2014). Numerical study of concrete spall damage to blast loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 68, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., & Tong, D. (2003). Perforation thickness and ballistic limit of concrete target subjected to rigid projectile impact. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 129, 1083–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Pun, S., & Langston, C. (2005). A preliminary study on building demolition engineering and management. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 4, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mi, S.-S., Zhang, X.-E., & Tao, G.-M. (2005). Finite element analysis of spherical fragments penetrating LY-12 aluminum alloy target. Explosion and Shock Waves, 25, 477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, T., Mendis, P., Gupta, A., & Ramsay, J. (2007). Blast loading and blast effects on structures–an overview. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering, 7, 76–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, L., Qu, M., & Feng, G. (2005). Study on terminal effects of dense fragment cluster impact on armor plate. Part I: analytical model. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 31, 755–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, F., & Hua, Z. J. (2012). Three-dimensional numerical modelling of concrete-like materials subjected to dynamic loadings. Advances in Protective Structures Research, 1, 33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razaqpur, A. G., Tolba, A., & Contestabile, E. (2007). Blast loading response of reinforced concrete panels reinforced with externally bonded GFRP laminates. Composites Part B Engineering, 38, 535–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remennikov, A. (2007). The state of the art of explosive loads characterisation.

  • Sikarwar, R. S., Velmurugan, R., & Gupta, N. (2014). Influence of fiber orientation and thickness on the response of glass/epoxy composites subjected to impact loading. Composites Part B Engineering, 60, 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Cusatis, G., Pelessone, D., Landis, E., Odaniel, J., & Baylot, J. (2014). Discrete modeling of ultra-high-performance concrete with application to projectile penetration. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 65, 13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. D., & Hetherington, J. G. (1994). Blast and ballistic loading of structures. Oxford: Digital Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabaei, Z. S., Volz, J. S., Baird, J., Gliha, B. P., & Keener, D. I. (2013). Experimental and numerical analyses of long carbon fiber reinforced concrete panels exposed to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 57, 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabor, D. (2000). The hardness of metals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. (2007). Detonation propagation in high explosives. APS Shock Compression of Condensed Matter Meeting Abstracts, 2007.

  • Übeyli, M., Yildirim, R. O., & Ögel, B. (2007). On the comparison of the ballistic performance of steel and laminated composite armors. Materials and Design, 28, 1257–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unosson, M., & Nilsson, L. (2006). Projectile penetration and perforation of high performance concrete: experimental results and macroscopic modelling. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 32, 1068–1085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. A. & Wayt, T. D. (1996). Polyurea coatings compositions and coating having improved flexibility. Google Patents.

  • Walters, W., Jonas, G., & Zukas, J. (1985). Explosive loading of lead hemispherical liners. Advances and trends in structures and dynamics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z.-L., Li, Y.-C., Shen, R., & Wang, J. (2007). Numerical study on craters and penetration of concrete slab by ogive-nose steel projectile. Computers and Geotechnics, 34, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Bai, Y., & Meyers, M. (2006). Deformation, phase transformation and recrystallization in the shear bands induced by high-strain rate loading in titanium and its alloys. Journal of Materials Science And Technology-Shenyang, 22, 737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, K., & Lu, Y. (2006). Numerical simulation study of spallation in reinforced concrete plates subjected to blast loading. Computers & Structures, 84, 431–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, A. (2000). Technical expertise as a contributing factor in three disasters. Lessons From Disasters: Seminar Notes, 2000. Institution of Engineers, Australia, 25.

  • Zhou, X., Kuznetsov, V., Hao, H., & Waschl, J. (2008). Numerical prediction of concrete slab response to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35, 1186–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukas, J. A., Walters, W., & Walters, W. P. (2002). Explosive effects and applications. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I would like to acknowledge the support and encouragement provided by Professor Bijan Somali, Doctor Chunwei Zhang and Doctor Eric Anciche.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graeme McKenzie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKenzie, G., Samali, B., Zhang, C. et al. Design strategies for fragment and projectile penetration into steel and concrete structural elements using CONWEP. Asian J Civ Eng 19, 793–809 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0064-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0064-x

Keywords

Navigation