Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of seismic behavior improvement in RCS connections

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, three-dimensional finite element (FE) models have been established using ABAQUS software to simulate the performance of the composite joints with reinforced concrete column and steel beam (RCS) connections. For this purpose, a nonlinear FE analysis was carried out on the reference model. The accuracy of the numerical model was examined through a comparison to experimental results and there was good agreement between them. Based on the verified reference model, a parametric study was conducted on the RCS joint components such as steel band plate, face bearing plate and web doubler plate, then, by providing new details, the seismic behavior of RCS connections was investigated. The results indicated that utilizing proposed details can increase the moment bending capacity and dissipated energy of RCS joints up to 10%. It is also observed that the location of the plastic hinge is kept out of the column’s face by means of haunch brackets and flange plates, and it takes place in the steel beam at a distance equal to the height of the beam section from the column’s face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABAQUS 6.13 (2013). Analysis user’s guide volume III (Materials), version 6.13, USA.

  • ACI 347.1-05. (2005). acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. Michigan: American Concrete Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • AISC 341–10. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alizadeh, S., Attari, N. K. A., & Kazemi, M. T. (2013). The seismic performance of new detailing for RCS connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 91, 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee on Design Criteria for Composite Structures in Steel and Concrete. (1994). Guidelines for design of joints between steel beams and reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 120(8), 2330–2357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM A572/A572 M-12. (2012). Standard specification for high strength low-alloy columbium-vanadium structural steel. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM A615/A615 M-12. (2012). Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATC-24. (1992). Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures. Redwood: Applied Technology Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, B. F., Ghaffarzadeh, H., & Talebian, N. (2013). Seismic performance of composite RCS special moment frames. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(2), 450–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bano, Sh, & Rahamath, A. (2017). Seismic performance assessment of RCS building by response spectrum and pushover analysis. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 3(1), 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugeja, M.N. (1999). Seismic behavior of composite moment resisting frame systems, Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, USA.

  • CEB-FIP Model Code. (1990). International recommendation for the design and construction of concrete structures. London: Thomas Telford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. T., & Chen, C. C. (2005). Seismic behavior of steel beam and reinforced concrete column connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(5), 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, H. A. W., Hordijk, D. A., & Reinhardt, H. W. (1986). Experimental determination of crack softening characteristics of normal weight and lightweight concrete. Delft University of Technology (Heron), 31(2), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deierlein, G. G. (1988). Design of moment connections for composite framed structures, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.

  • Drucker, D. C., & Prager, W. (1952). Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 10, 157–165.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fargier-Gabaldón, L. (2005). Design of moment connections for composite framed structures, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan, USA.

  • FEMA-350. (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izaki, Y., Yamanouchi, H., Nishiyama, I., & Fukuchi, Y. (1988). Seismic behavior of girder-to-column connections developed for an advanced mixed structure system. Proceedings of Ninth WCEE (Tokyo-Kyoto), 4, 707–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowiak, T., & Lodygowski, T. (2005). Identification of parameters of concrete damage plasticity constitutive model. Foundations of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanno, R. (1993). Strength, deformation, and seismic resistance of joints between steel beams and reinforced concrete columns, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.

  • Khaloo, A., & Doost, R. B. (2018). Seismic performance of precast RC column to steel beam connections with variable joint configurations. Engineering Structures, 160, 408–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kmiecik, P., & Kaminski, M. (2011). Modeling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures with concrete strength degradation taken into consideration. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 11(3), 623–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Fenves, G. L. (1998). A plastic damage concrete model for earthquake analysis of dams. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27(9), 937–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Li, Q., Jiang, W., & Jiang, L. (2011). Seismic performance of composite reinforced concrete and steel moment frame structures—state-of-the-art. Composites, 42, 190–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X. M. (2003). Seismic behavior of RCS beam—column subassemblies and frame systems designed following a joint deformation-based capacity design approach. PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan, USA.

  • Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., & Onate, E. (1989). A plastic damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25(3), 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madandoust, R., & Kazemi, M. (2017). Numerical analysis of break-off test method on concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 487–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirghaderi, S. R., Eghbali, N. B., & Ahmadi, M. M. (2016). Moment-connection between continuous steel beams and reinforced concrete column under cyclic loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 118, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, X. H., Nguyen, Q., Le, D. D., & Mirza, O. (2016). Experimental study on seismic performance of new RCS connection. Structures, 9, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama, I., Kuramoto, H., & Noguchi, H. (2004). Guidelines: seismic design of composite reinforced concrete and steel buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, H., & Uchida, K. (2004). Finite element method analysis of hybrid structural frames with reinforced concrete columns and steel beams. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(2), 328–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra-Montesinos, G. J. (2000). Seismic behavior, strength and retrofit of exterior RC column to steel beam connections, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Michigan, USA.

  • Sheikh, T. M. (1987). Moment connections between steel beams and concrete columns, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.

  • Sheikh, T. M., Deierlein, G. G., Yura, J. A., & Jirsa, J. O. (1989). Beam–column moment connections for composite frames: part 1. Journal of Structural Engineering, 115(11), 2858–2876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szczecina, M., & Winnicki, A. (2015). Calibration of the CDP model parameters in Abaqus. Incheon: World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, T., Kanoh, Y., & Mikame, A. (1990). Mixed structural systems of precast concrete columns and steel beams. IABSE Brussels, 60, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahmat Madandoust.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Madandoust, R., Vatandoost, M. & Zehtab, M. Evaluation of seismic behavior improvement in RCS connections. Asian J Civ Eng 19, 741–754 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0055-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0055-y

Keywords

Navigation