Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment and enhancement of the behavior of lightly RC wall elements subjected to pure shear

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observed damage from the past earthquakes has indicated that several structural walls before the 1970s are non-seismically designed and performed poorly, exhibiting unexpected failure modes such as shear failure due to inadequate detailing and/or poor confinement of concrete core. The shear behavior alone is complex, because it influenced by a host of parameters often interdependent. This paper aims to assess and enhance the non-linear behavior of lightly reinforced concrete wall or panel elements subjected to pure shear. The existing softened membrane model was chosen as a basic model to evaluate the structural behavior and the work strategy was given as follows: first, identification of the range in which reinforced concrete panels were considered as lightly reinforced elements, based on the non-ductile behavior, Experimental data of reinforced concrete panel element A1 conducted by Pang and Hsu and the recommendation of Euro code 2. Next, the influence of the following design parameters on the shear behavior of lightly reinforced panel elements was investigated: the steel grid orientation; the diameter of longitudinal reinforcement, the type of reinforcement, and the crack angle; Finally, to enhance the shear performance, one case that reinforced with ribbed bars exhibited a non-ductile behavior has been selected to strengthen it with one, two, or three layers of fiber-reinforced polymer as an alternative to the traditional methods, using the so-called “softened membrane model-FRP”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arghadeep, L., Wang, J., Hsu, T. T. C., & Mo, Y. L. (2007). Rational shear provisions for AASHTO LRFD specifications: Technical Report 0-4759-1.

  • Chintrakarn, R. (2001). Minimum shear steel and failure modes diagram of reinforced concrete membrane elements, Master’s Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX.

  • Fardis, M. N, & Tsionis, G. (2011). Specific rules for design and detailing of concrete buildings design for DCM and DCH Illustration of elements design. Online available from eurocodes. jrc. ec. europa.eu/…/S4_EC8-Lisbon_M%20FARDIS.pdf.

  • Ferreira, D., Oller, E., Marí, A., & Bairán, J. (2013). Numerical analysis of shear critical RC beams strengthened in shear with FRP sheets. Journal of Composites for Construction, 17(6), 04013016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischinger, M., Rejec, K., & Isaković, T. (2012). Modeling inelastic Shear response of RC Walls. In Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon.

  • Hsu, T. T. C. (1991). Nonlinear analysis of concrete membrane elements. Structural Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 88(5), 552–561.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. T. C. (1993). Unified theory of reinforced concrete (p. 336). Boca Raton: CRC Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. T. C. (1998). Stresses and crack angles in concrete membrane elements. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 124(12), 1476–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, T. T. C., & Zhu, R. R. H. (2002). Softened membrane model for reinforced concrete elements in shear. Structural Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 99(4), 460–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour, M. Y. (2001). Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements under cyclic shear, experiments to theory. PhD Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Houston.

  • Pang, X. B., & Hsu, T. T. C. (1995). Behavior of reinforced concrete membrane elements in shear. ACI Structural Journal, 92(6), 665–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrone, F. (2012). Shear resisting mechanisms in composite steel-concrete beams. PhD Thesis, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome.

  • Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1986). Modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to Shear. ACI Journal, 2, 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathcad Software 15, online available from: support. ptc.com/products/mathcad/mathcad-15-0/free-trial?refid.

  • Yang, G., Zomorodian, M., Belarbi, A., Ayoub, A. S., & Acun, B. (2013). Experimental and analytical investigations on the behavior of FRP-reinforced concrete element subjected to pure shear, Online Available from https://www.researchgate.net/268445648_Experimental_and_AnalyticalInvestigationontheBehavior of FRP-ReinforcedConcreteElementSubjected toPureShear.pdf.

  • Zhu, R. R. H., Hsu, T. T. C., & Lee, J. Y. (2001). Rational shear modulus for smeared crack analysis of reinforced concrete. Structural Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 98(4), 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salima Djehaichia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Djehaichia, S., Lassoued, R. Assessment and enhancement of the behavior of lightly RC wall elements subjected to pure shear. Asian J Civ Eng 19, 663–671 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0051-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0051-2

Keywords

Navigation