Skip to main content

Persistent Indifference of Emmer Wheats Grain Yield and Physiological Functions to Nitrogen Supply: Evidence from Two Irrigation Regimes and Dryland Conditions

Abstract

Scientific data on emmer wheat’s response to N and water supplies is scarce. Two field experiments were conducted on a group of five emmer wheat landraces (Joneghan, Zarneh, Singerd, Shahrekord, Khoygan), a durum, and a bread wheat genotype. In the first experiment, the genotypes were subjected to 30 (N-limited) and 100 kg N ha–1 (N-supplied) at non-stress and drought stress conditions. In the second experiment, responses of these genotypes to the mentioned N supplies were studied under dryland and dryland + terminal complementary irrigation conditions. Water deprivation (being either due to the imposed drought stress or the dryland condition) led to decreases in chlorophyll concentration, maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II, relative water content, grains/spike, spikes/plant, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, plant above-ground dry mass, and N use efficiency of the examined wheat genotypes. However, emmer wheat genotypes tended to vary less in response to water supply at least in terms of a majority of the traits, including grain yield (28–30% vs 40–58% drought-induced decreases for emmer and improved wheats, respectively) and above-ground dry mass (12–17% vs 23–40% drought-induced decreases for emmer and improved wheats, respectively). Increase in N supply led to decreases in grains/spike, spikes/plant, 1000-grains weight, and grain yield of the emmer wheats, despite increases in these grain yield attributes and grain yield of the durum and bread wheats. Results were indicative of greater protein content (15.7 vs 12.4% for non-stressed emmer and improved wheats, respectively) but a smaller grain yield (2985 vs 7275 kg ha−1 for non-stressed emmer and improved wheats, respectively), harvest index, and N use efficiency in the emmer wheats, compared to the durum and bread wheats, across different N and water supplies. Our findings were novel in that the emmer wheat was found more sustained across different water availabilities and no responsive to N levels that are beneficial to the durum and bread wheats.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variances

Cars:

Carotenoids

Chl:

Chlorophyll

dryland + CI:

Dryland + complementary irrigation

HI:

Harvest index

LSD:

Least significant difference

Fv/Fm :

Maximal quantum efficiency of PSII

N:

Nitrogen

NIR:

Near infrared spectroscopy

NUE:

N use efficiency

RCBD:

Randomized complete block design

SDM:

Plant above-ground dry mass

References

  1. Abdehpour, Z., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2019). Concurrence of ionic homeostasis alteration and dry mass sustainment in emmer wheats exposed to saline water: Implications for tackling irrigation water salinity. Plant and Soil, 440, 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04090-1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrg. Drain. Pap. 56. FAO, Rome

  3. Anbessa, Y., Juskiw, P., Good, A., Nyachiro, J., & Helm, J. (2009). Genetic variability in nitrogen use efficiency of spring barley. Crop Science, 49, 1259–1269.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arzani, A. (2011). Emmer (Triticum turgidum spp. dicoccum) flour and breads. In V. R. Preedy, R. R. Watson, & V. B. Patel (Eds.), Flour and breads and their fortification in health and disease prevention (pp. 69–78). London, Burlington: Academic Press, Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Askari, E., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2015). Osmoregulation-mediated differential responses of field-grown fennel genotypes to drought. Industrial Crops and Products, 76, 494–508.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bates, L. S., Waldran, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water studies. Plant and Soil, 39, 205–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bavec, M., Narodoslawsky, M., Bavec, F., & Turinek, M. (2011). Ecological impact of wheat and spelt production under industrial and alternative farming systems. Renew Agric Food Syst, 27, 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Antuono LF, Bravi R (1995) The hulled wheat industry: Present developments and impact on genetic resources conservation. In: S. Padulosi, K. Hammer, & J. Heller (Eds.), Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats, Tuscany, Italy. pp. 221–233.

  9. Ghaouti, L., & Link, W. (2009). Local vs. formal breeding and inbred line vs. synthetic cultivar for organic farming: Case of Vicia faba L. Field Crops Research, 110, 167–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kant, S., Bi, Y. M., & Rothstein, S. J. (2011). Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62, 1499–1509.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiani, M., Gheysari, M., Mostafazadeh-Fard, B., Majidi, M. M., Karchani, K., & Hoogenboon, G. (2016). Effect of the interaction of water and nitrogen on sunflower under drip irrigation in an arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 171, 162–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, Z., Bronson, K. F., Thorp, K. R., Mon, J., Badaruddin, M., & Wang, G. (2014). Cultivar and N fertilizer rate affect yield and N use efficiency in irrigated durum wheat. Crop Science, 54, 1175–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichtenthaler, H. K., & Wellburn, W. R. (1994). Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions, 11, 591–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Longin, C. F. H., Ziegler, J., Schweiggert, R., Koehler, P., Carle, R., & Würschum, T. (2016). Comparative study of hulled (einkorn, emmer, and spelt) and naked wheats (durum and bread wheat): Agronomic performance and quality traits. Crop Science, 56, 302–311.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lyudmila, S., Klimentina, D., Tatyana, P., Nikolay, T., & Urs, F. (2009). Antioxidative protection and proteolytic activity in tolerant and sensitive wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties subjected to long-term field drought. Plant Growth Regulation, 58, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maaz, T., Pan, W., & Hammac, W. (2016). Influence of soil nitrogen and water supply on canola nitrogen use efficiency. Agronomy Journal, 108, 2099–2109.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mahjourimajd, S., Taylor, J., Rengel, Z., Khabaz-Saberi, H., Kuchel, H., Okamoto, M., & Langridge, P. (2016). The genetic control of grain protein content under variable nitrogen supply in an Australian wheat mapping population. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Marti, J., & Slafer, G. (2014). Bread and durum wheat yields under a wide range of environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 156, 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Moragues, M., Garcia del Moral, L. F., Moralejo, M., & Royo, C. (2006a). Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin II. Biomass production and allocation. Field Crops Research, 95, 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moragues, M., Garcia del Moral, L. F., Moralejo, M., & Royo, C. (2006b). Yield formation strategies of durum wheat landraces with distinct pattern of dispersal within the Mediterranean basin I: Yield components. Field Crops Research, 95, 194–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morgounov, A., Keser, M., Kan, M., Küçükçongar, M., Özdemir, F., Gummadov, N., Muminjanov, H., Zuev, E., & Qualset, C. O. (2016). Wheat landraces currently grown in Turkey: Distribution, diversity, and use. Crop Science, 56, 3112–3124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy, K. M., Campbell, K. G., Lyon, S. R., Stephen, S., & Jones, S. S. (2007). Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Research, 102, 172–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muurinen, S., Slafer, G. A., & Peltonen-Sainio, P. (2006). Breeding effects on nitrogen use efficiency of spring cereals under northern conditions. Crop Science, 46, 561–568.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozturk, A., & Aydin, F. (2004). Effect of water stress at various stages on some quality characteristics of winter wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pan, X., Lada, R. R., Caldwell, C. D., & Falk, K. C. (2011). Water-stress and N-nutrition effects on photosynthesis and growth of Brassica carinata. Photosynthetica, 49, 309–315.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peleg, Z., Saranga, Y., Yazici, A., Fahima, T., Ozturk, L., & Cakmak, I. (2008). Grain zinc, iron and protein concentrations and zinc-efficiency in wild emmer wheat under contrasting irrigation regimes. Plant and Soil, 306, 57–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porcel, R., & Ruiz-Lozano, J. (2004). Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55, 1743–1750.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pourazari, F., Vico, G., Ehsanzadeh, P., & Weih, M. (2015). Contrasting growth pattern and nitrogen economy in ancient and modern wheat varieties. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 95, 851–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sabzalian, M. R., Khashei, M., & Ghaderian, M. (2014). Artificial and hybrid Fuzzy Linear Neural Network-based estimation of seed oil content of safflower. Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society, 91, 2091–2099.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheibanirad, A., Mirlohi, A., Mohammadi, R., Ehsanzadeh, P., & Sayed-Tabatabaei, B. E. (2014). Cytogenetic and crossability studies in hulled wheat collected from Central Zagros in Iran. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 300, 1895–1901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Slafer, G. A., Savin, R., & Sadras, V. O. (2014). Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crops Research, 157, 71–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smart, R. E., & Bingham, G. E. (1974). Rapid estimates of relative water content. Plant Physiology, 53, 258–260.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stallknecht, G. F., Gilbertson, K. M., & Ranney, J. E. (1996). Alternative wheat cereals as food grains: Einkorn, emmer, spelt, kamut, and triticale. In J. Janick (Ed.), Progress in new crops (pp. 156–170). ASHS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas, D. S., & Turner, D. W. (2001). Banana (Musa sp.) leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in response to soil drought, shading and lamina folding. Scientia Horticulturae, 90, 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4238(00)00260-0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tosti, G., Farneselli, M., Benincasa, P., & Guiducci, M. (2016). Nitrogen fertilization strategies for organic wheat production: Crop yield and nitrate leaching. Agronomy Journal, 108, 770–781.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yousefzadeh Najafabadi, M., & Ehsanzadeh, P. (2017). Salicylic acid effects on osmoregulation and seed yield in drought-stressed sesame. Agronomy Journal, 109, 1414–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Gh. Saeidi for his valuable editing comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PE designed the experiments, supervised the research work, and prepared the manuscript. MV conducted the Experiment 1 and collected and analyzed the data. VR conducted the Experiment 2 and collected and analyzed the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parviz Ehsanzadeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ehsanzadeh, P., Vaghar, M. & Roushanzamir, V. Persistent Indifference of Emmer Wheats Grain Yield and Physiological Functions to Nitrogen Supply: Evidence from Two Irrigation Regimes and Dryland Conditions. Int. J. Plant Prod. 15, 391–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-021-00143-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tetraploid wheat
  • Drought
  • Hulled wheats
  • Landraces
  • Fertilizer
  • Dryland