Skip to main content
Log in

The Coupling Approach of Isogeometric Analysis and Peridynamics for Plane Problem with Non-Uniform Control Net

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isogeometric analysis (IGA) is an important mesh-free method which utilizes the splines basis functions and control net in the CAD geometry for simulation. Its theoretical basis is continuum mechanics, and it is not suitable for fracture problems. Peridynamics (PD) is a non-local theory based on integral equations, which is suitable for discontinuous problems such as cracks, while the non-local property of PD increases the computational effort. The coupling of IGA and PD promotes the simulation of cracks with the precise CAD geometry and improves the computational efficiency compared with that of pure PD model. In this paper, the coupling approach of IGA and PD (IGA-PD) for plane problems with non-uniform control net is introduced, and the main contribution is a system of algorithms to convert the non-uniform control net into IGA-PD coupling model. A volume division method is proposed to calculate the occupied volumes for the PD nodes. To account for the non-uniform control net, the search range correction method, volume and centroid correlation methods of family nodes and dual-horizon method are applied to improve the computational precision. An exponential gradual constitutive model (EGCM) is applied to calculate the crack propagation of materials. The proposed IGA-PD model with non-uniform control net makes full use of the advantages of the non-local continuum theory, which can solve the fracture problem and alleviate the surface effect of PD. The processing algorithms for the non-uniform control net improve the computational accuracy. Numerical examples of static problems and crack propagations are given. The results prove that the search range, centroid and volume correction methods are important for improving the numerical precision. The plate under stretch and bending, Kalthoff–Winkler impact problem and simulation of concrete material are carried out to show the effectiveness of the proposed IGA-PD model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hughes T, Cottrell J, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(39):4135–4195

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Moës N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999) A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46(1):131–150

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobaru F, Zhang GF (2015) Why do cracks branch? A peridynamic investigation of dynamic brittle fracture. Int J Fract 196(1–2):59–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benson DJ, Bazilevs Y, De Luycker E, Hsu MC, Scott M, Hughes TJR, Belytschko T (2010) A generalized finite element formulation for arbitrary basis functions: From isogeometric analysis to xfem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83(6):765–785

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Naderi M, Sarkar S, Amiri M, Iyyer N (2016) Extended isogeometric analysis (XIGA) of fatigue life in attachment lug. J Fail Anal Prev 16(4):601–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen VP, Anitescu C, Bordas SP, Rabczuk T (2015) Isogeometric analysis: An overview and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul 117:89–116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83(17):1526–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Han F, Rey C, Askari A (2012) A morphing strategy to couple non-local to local continuum mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 60(6):1088–1102

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Han F, Lubineau G, Azdoud Y (2016) Adaptive coupling between damage mechanics and peridynamics: A route for objective simulation of material degradation up to complete failure. J Mech Phys Solids 94:453–472

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Han F, Lubineau G, Azdoud Y, Askari A (2016) A morphing approach to couple state-based peridynamics with classical continuum mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 301:336–358

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wildman RA, O’Grady JT, Gazonas GA (2017) A hybrid multiscale finite element/peridynamics method. Int J Fract 207(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu YT, Zhang Q, Gu X (2017) Hybrid model of peridynamics and finite element method under implicit schemes. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science) 51(7):1324–1330

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bie YH, Li S, Hu X, Cui XY (2019) An implicit dual-based approach to couple peridynamics with classical continuum mechanics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 120(12):1349–1379

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shojaei A, Mudric T, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2016) A coupled meshless finite point/peridynamic method for 2d dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Mech Sci 119:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galvanetto U, Mudric T, Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M (2016) An effective way to couple fem meshes and peridynamics grids for the solution of static equilibrium problems. Mech Res Commun 76:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zaccariotto M, Mudric T, Tomasi D, Shojaei A, Galvanetto U (2018) Coupling of fem meshes with peridynamic grids. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 330:471–497

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia Y, Meng XH, Shen GZ, Zheng GJ, Hu P (2021) Isogeometric analysis of cracks with peridynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 377:113700

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng GJ, Shen GZ, Hu P, Xia Y (2020) Coupling approach of isogeometric analysis with non-ordinary state-based peridynamics. Eur J Mech A Solids 82:103981

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wildman R, O’Grady J, Gazonas G (2017) A hybrid multiscale finite element/peridynamics method. Int J Fract 207(1):41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2017) Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 318:762–782

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Zingales M, Paola MD, Inzerillo G (2011) The finite element method for the mechanically based model of non-local continuum. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(13):1558–1576

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Yaghoobi A, Chorzepa MG (2018) Formulation of symmetry boundary modeling in non-ordinary state-based peridynamics and coupling with finite element analysis. Math Mech Solids 23(8):1156–1176

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ni T, Zhu QZ, Zhao LY, Li PF (2018) Peridynamic simulation of fracture in quasi brittle solids using irregular finite element mesh. Eng Fract Mech 188:320–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bobaru F, Ha YD, Hu W (2010) Numerical integration in peridynamics[r]. Department of Mechanical Materials Engineering

  26. Parks ML, Lehoucq RB, Plimpton SJ, Silling SA (2008) Implementing peridynamics within a molecular dynamics code. Comput Phys Commun 179(11):777–783

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Parks ML, Plimpton SJ, Lehoucq RB, Silling SA (2008) Peridynamics with lammps: A user guide. Sandia National Laboratory Report, SAND2008-0135, Albuquerque, New Mexico

  28. Seleson P (2014) Improved one-point quadrature algorithms for two-dimensional peridynamic models based on analytical calculations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 282:184–217

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Cai YC, Rabczuk T (2016) Dual-horizon peridynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 108(12):1451–1476

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng GJ, Wang JL, Shen GZ, Xia Y, Li WD (2021) A new quadrature algorithm consisting of volume and integral domain corrections for two-dimensional peridynamic models. Int J Fract 229(1):39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabczuk T, Ren HL, Zhuang XY (2019) A nonlocal operator method for partial differential equations with application to electromagnetic waveguide problem. Computers, Materials & Continua 59(1):31–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Oterkus E, Zhu HH, Rabczuk T (2021) Nonlocal strong forms of thin plate, gradient elasticity, magneto-electro-elasticity and phase field fracture by nonlocal operator method. arXiv 2103.08696

  33. Ren HL, Zhuang XY, Rabczuk T (2020) A nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 358:112621

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Silling SA (2021) Kinetics of failure in an elastic peridynamic material. Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling 3:1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Tong Y, Shen WQ, Shao JF, Chen JL (2020) A new bond model in peridynamics theory for progressive failure in cohesive brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 223:106767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Macek RW, Silling SA (2007) Peridynamics via finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des 43(15):1169–1178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Fang GD, Liu S, Fu MQ, Wang B, Wu ZW, Liang J (2019) A method to couple state-based peridynamics and finite element method for crack propagation problem. Mech Res Commun 95:89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu WY, Hong JW (2012) A coupling approach of discretized peridynamics with finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 245–246:163–175

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Cook RD (2002) Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th ed. Wiley

  40. Shi FZ (2001) Computer aided geometric design and nonuniform rational B-splines. Higher Education Press

  41. James VC (2009) An extended finite element method with analytical enrichment for cohesive crack modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 78(1):48–83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaltho JF, Winkler S (1988) Failure mode transition at high rates of shear loading. Impact Loading and Dynamic Behavior of Materials 1:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kalthoff JF (2000) Modes of dynamic shear failure in solids. Int J Fract 101(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Deng XL, Wang B (2019) Peridynamic modeling of dynamic damage of polymer bonded explosive. Comput Mater Sci 173:109405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Winkler B, Hofstetter G, Lehar H (2004) Application of a constitutive model for concrete to the analysis of a precast segmental tunnel lining. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 28(7–8):797–819

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Winkler B, Hofstetter G, Niederwanger G (2001) Experimental verification of a constitutive model for concrete cracking. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L Journal of Materials Design and Applications 215(2):75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by Projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12072065, U1908233 and 11702056), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0703200) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (Grant No. DUT20JC34). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guozhe Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

− A system of algorithms to convert the non-uniform control net into IGA-PD coupling model is provided.

− The applicability of IGA-PD coupling model is greatly expanded with improved precision.

− An exponential gradual constitutive model (EGCM) is applied which is suitable for concrete and steel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Y., Meng, X., Zheng, G. et al. The Coupling Approach of Isogeometric Analysis and Peridynamics for Plane Problem with Non-Uniform Control Net. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 4, 475–500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-021-00065-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-021-00065-y

Keywords

Navigation