Skip to main content
Log in

Deconstructing Updike’s Neo-colonialist Narrative

  • Arena of Epistemology
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

American novels focusing on 9/11 generally demonize and portray Islam as a warmongering religion and its believers as violent people. Previous research has validated this perspective. The objective of this research is to examine Updike’s mindset and attitude towards Islam and Muslims from postcolonial reading lens in his novel Terrorist which foregrounds Islam, Muslims, and Islamic doctrines, making use of 9/11 as the impetus that charts the chain of events. The conceptual framework focuses on a postcolonial concept drawn from David Spurr’s rhetorical feature of “debasement”. The methodology centers on the colonial nuances which permeate the novel through a study on characters in the novel. Referring to the wrong interpretations of Islam, as shown by the references used by Updike, has produced a wrong picture of Islamic doctrines and consequently results in demonizing Islam and Muslims. The conclusions demonstrate Terrorist as Islamophobic and bear the tinges of colonial writings which mainly results in debasement of Islam and Muslims and also divulges how Updike’s hegemonic ideology about Islam has shaped a kind of discursive construction in his novel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, M. H., & Harpham, G. (2014). A glossary of literary terms: Cengage Learning.

  • Ambesange Praveen, V. (2016). Postcolonialism: Edward Said & Gayatri Spivak. Research Journal of Recent Sciences, 2277, 2502.

  • Awan, M. S. (2010). Global terror and the rise of xenophobia/sslamophobia: An analysis of American cultural production since September 11. Islamic Studies, 49(4), 521–537. 

  • Batchelor, B. (2009). Running toward the apocalypse: John Updikes new America. (3420573 Ph.D.), University of South Florida, Ann Arbor. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/750495940?accountid=41453. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Full Text database.

  • Freud, S. (1961). Civilization and its discontents (T. J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: Norton.

  • Hamadi, L. (2014). Edward Said: The postcolonial theory and the literature of decolonization. European Scientific Journal.

  • Hartnell, A. (2011). Violence and the faithful in post-9/11 America: Updike’s terrorist, Islam, and the specter of exceptionalism. Mfs-Modern Fiction Studies, 57(3), 477–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, J. (2006). Rabbit Is Radical. Retrieved from http://nymag.com/arts/books/reviews/17120/

  • McGrath, C. (2006). In ‘Terrorist’: A cautious novelist takes on a new fear. New York Times, 31.

  • McGrath, C., & Updike, J. (2006). In ‘Terrorist,’ a cautious novelist takes on a new fear. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/31/books/31updi.html?_r=0

  • Price, J. L. (2001). John Updike and religion: The sense of the sacred and the motions of grace: Oxford Univ Press Inc Journals Dept, 2001 Evans RD, Cary, NC 27513 USA.

  • Said, E. (1980). Islam through Western eyes. The Nation, 26(1), 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism: Vintage Books.

  • San Juan, E. (1998). The limits of postcolonial criticism; The discourse of Edward Said. Against the Current, 13(5), 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurr, D. (1993). The rhetoric of empire: Colonial discourse in journalism, travel writing, and imperial administration. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarloff, E. (2006). A masterful failure. Retrieved from https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/amasterfulfailure

  • Updike, J. (2007). Terrorist: Penguin books.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Morteza Yousofi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousofi, M., Sistani, R.R. & Farivar, M. Deconstructing Updike’s Neo-colonialist Narrative. Hu Arenas (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00317-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00317-3

Keywords

Navigation