Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Voices of the Unheard: Women and Infertility in India

  • Arena of Health
  • Published:
Human Arenas Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More than just a medical condition, infertility is mired in a multitude of socio-cultural phenomena that leave indelible impressions on the lives of women and families. A qualitative phenomenological study examined the experiences of infertility for women from low-income families in India, illustrating its impact on well-being. Women’s experiences with their partners, family, community and medical service providers had multiple consequences on their sense of identity and mental health. Motherhood emerged as an inextricable part of being a woman, and the inability to have a child left women feeling incomplete and “defective”. While most women experienced support from their husbands, their encounters with family and society left them feeling victimized, scrutinized and isolated. Reproductive choices were rarely in the hands of the women as they continued with the physically and emotionally ravaging cycles of treatment to fulfill the individual and familial desire to have a child. Women coped by taking care of themselves emotionally, by actively looking for alternatives or by suppressing their feelings and leaving everything to God. The study has implications for professionals working on gender and reproductive health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

The data and illustrations are available with the authors.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. ATT stands for attitudes, FOO stands for family of origin and FOP stands for family of procreation.

References

  • Bali, A., Dhingra, R., & Baru, A. (2010). Marital adjustment of childless couples. Journal of Social Science, 24(1), 73–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. V. (2014). Misconception: Social class and infertility in America. Rutgers University Press.

  • Boivin, J., Takefman, J., & Braverman, A. (2011). The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: Development and general psychometric properties. Human Reproduction, 26(8), 2084–2091.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, L. H. (1987). Infertility as boundary ambiguity: One theoretical perspective. Family Process, 26(3), 359–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, P., & Barker, K. K. (2010). The social construction of illness: Key insights and policy implications. Journal of health and social behavior, 51(1_suppl), S67-S79.

  • Dillu, R., Sheoran, P., & Sarin, J. (2013). An exploratory study to assess the quality of life of infertile couples at selected infertility clinics in Haryana. Journal of Nursing and Health Science, 3, 45–51.

  • Goldenberg, H. (1997). Who am I, if I am not a mother. Case studies in existential psychotherapy and counselling, 96–106.

  • Greil, A. L., Slauson‐Blevins, K., & McQuillan, J. (2010). The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociology of health & illness, 32(1), 140-162. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/102

  • Hjelmstedt, A., Andersson, L., Skoog-Svanberg, A., Bergh, T., Boivin, J., & Collins, A. (1999). Gender differences in psychological reactions to infertility among couples seeking IVF-and ICSI-treatment. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 78(1), 42–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H., Singh, R., & Bindu, M. (2009). Psychological distress, coping and subjective wellbeing among infertile women. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35(2), 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakar, S. (1978). The inner world: A psychoanalytic study of Hindu childhood and society. New Delhi.

  • Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

  • Mascarenhas, M. N., Flaxman, S. R., Boerma, T., Vanderpoel, S., & Stevens, G. A. (2012). National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: A systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. PLoS Med, 9(12), e1001356.

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. 2nd Edition, Sage Publications, London.

  • Mishra K., Dubey A. (2014). Indian women’s perspective on reproduction and childlessness: Narrative analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences.

  • Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp. 169–186). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridenour, A. F., Yorgason, J. B., & Peterson, B. (2009). The infertility resilience model: Assessing individual, couple, and external predictive factors. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(1), 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, N. F. (1976). The motherhood mandate. Journal of Social Issues, 32(3), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer D, Hunter M, (2003). eds. Assisted human reproduction: Psychological and ethical dilemmas. London Whurr Publishers.

  • Valsangkar, S., Bodhare, T., Bele, S., & Sai, S. (2011). An evaluation of the effect of infertility on marital, sexual satisfaction indices and health-related quality of life in women. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(2), 80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Balen, F., & Bos, H. M. (2009). The social and cultural consequences of being childless in poor-resource areas. Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 1(2), 106.

  • Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., de Mouzon, J., Ishihara, O., Mansour, R., Nygren, K., & Van der Poel, S. (2009). The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Human Reproduction, dep343.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

    Arushi Kothari

  2. School of Human Ecology, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Sujata Sriram

Authors
  1. Arushi Kothari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sujata Sriram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

This paper draws from the first author’s thesis completed at Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai, under the supervision of the second author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arushi Kothari.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Approval was obtained from the review committee of School of Human Ecology, Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

Consent to Participate

The participants gave verbal consent before participating in the study.

Consent for Publication

The authors agree with the content and give explicit consent to submit this manuscript for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kothari, A., Sriram, S. Voices of the Unheard: Women and Infertility in India. Hu Arenas 7, 212–231 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00269-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00269-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation