Abstract
This article attempts to understand the meaning-making of inceldom using dialogical self theory and semiotics while giving a view into the world of incels - a group of (typically) heterosexual men who suffer a great deal. 'Incel' is an abbreviation of 'involuntary celibate’ - a person who unwillingly is excluded from interpersonal sexual activity. The term incel is loaded with meaning that we try to unpack for the reader while providing some theoretical framework for this purpose. The strong tension between incels, research, and media is addressed as well as the experience of feeling caught in an unwanted state of inceldom which is crucial to understand incels. Towards the end, general points about inceldom and tragedies of the self are made. While sexuality is broadly socially represented as a given and something that is often just figured out, incels who feel excluded from their sexuality become miserable consequently. We theorize that incels create a double-protected border limiting their lives; (1) Tension between wanting yet fearing women creates a rigid border, and incels protect themselves by disowning their emotions. (2) When outsiders challenge the notion of inceldom, they are resisted. This double-protected border is meaningful and used to make sense of the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Figure 4 is publicly available following the link provided in the reference list.
References
Awad, S. H. (2020). The social life of images. Visual Studies, 35(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2020.1726206
Cooper, M. (2004). Encountering self–otherness: ‘I–I’ and ‘I–Me’ modes of self-relating. In H. J. M. Hermans, & G. Dimaggio, G. (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy. Brunner-Routledge.
Cottee, S. (2020). Incel (E)motives: Resentment, shame and revenge. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 44(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2020.1822589
Díaz, P., & Valji, N. (2019). Symbiosis of mysogyny and violent extremism: new understandings and policy implications. Journal of International Affairs, 72(2), 37–56. Retrieved May 12, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26760831
Donnelly, D., Burgess, E., Anderson, S., Davis, R., & Dillard, J. (2001). Involuntary celibacy: A life course analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 38(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490109552083
Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, betas, and incels: Theorizing the masculinities of the manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7(3), 243–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X0173001
Helding, S. R., & Mogensen, C. (2020). Vrede unge mænd. Center for Digital Pædagogik. https://cfdp.dk/tema/vrede-unge-maend/
Heritage, F., & Koller, V. (2019). Incels, in-groups, and ideologies:the representation of gendered social actors in a sexuality-based online community. In Lavender Languages 26, 2019–05–022019–05–04, University of Gothenburg.
Incel. (2021). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incel&oldid=1021579465
Incel Wiki. (2021, August 21). the encyclopedia of incel culture. Incel Wiki. https://incels.wiki/w/Main_Page
Janet, P. (1921). The fear of action. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 16(2–3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0073369
Knowyourmeme.com. (n.d.). Know your meme. Retrieved 26 May 2021, from https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/virgin-vs-chad
Mead, G. H., & Morris, C. W. (1943). Works of George Herbert Mead. Vol. 1: Mind, self, and society: from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (19. impr). University of Chicago Press.
Papadamou, K., Zannettou, S., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., & Sirivianos, M. (2021). Understanding the incel community on YouTube. ArXiv:2001.08293 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08293
Valsiner, J. (2006). The semiotic instruction of solitude: Processes of internalization and externalization. Sign System Studies, 34, 9–35.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. Sage.
Valsiner, J. (2016). Persisting resistance as resource for development. In N. Chaudhary, P. Hviid, G. Marsico, & J. W. Villadsen (Eds.), (2017). Resistance in Everyday Life. Springer: Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3581-4
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Jaan Valsiner, Mikkel Møberg Larsen, Andreas Bang, and Ekko Laini for guidance and criticism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moldrup, B.H.B., Jensen, A. Hidden Tragedies of the Self: the Stalemate of Involuntary Celibacy. Hu Arenas 7, 156–165 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00263-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00263-6