Morality Strives to Precede Society But Fails

Abstract

Morality, without a shadow of doubt, is one of the most controversial topics in the history of social sciences. Although, at its core, it is conceptualized as a set of principles which distinguish right from wrong, through ebb and flow, it has been molded in various frameworks which attempted to account for the nature and essence of it. Yet, no definition has been proposed which could stand up to criticism. Looking over the tumultuous history of morality, the present paper makes an attempt to bring to the fore the major stances on morality within philosophy and social sciences. Adopting a critical standpoint, the writers defy the attempts to provide a comprehensive definition of the concept. In the meantime, a path worth taking is proposed, i.e., a critical investigation of the effects of making actors cognizant of the results of their moral actions on their future conceptualization of morality as well as undertaking of moral actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Abend, G. (2008). Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory and Society, 37(2), 87–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9044-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, H. (1999). The education of Henry Adams. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1862)

  3. Anderson, R. L. (2017). Friedrich Nietzsche. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nietzsche/#Pers

  4. Aronson, E. (2018). The social animal (12th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Audi, R. (2015). Cambridge dictionary of philosophy (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergsma, A., Poot, G., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2008). Happiness in the garden of Epicurus. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(3), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9036-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Berlin, I. (1998). My intellectual path. The New York Review of Books, pp. 53–60.

  8. Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (2017). Jürgen Habermas. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/

  9. Brontë, C. (2011). Jane Eyre. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. (Original work published in 1847).

  10. Buckingham, W. (2011). The philosophy book. London: Dorling Kindersley.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carls, P. (2019). Emil Durkheim. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: https://www.iep.utm.edu/durkheim/

  12. Cherem, M. (2019). Jürgen Habermas. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/habermas/

  13. Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., Lieberman, M., Fischer, K., & Saltzstein, H. D. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral judgement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(1/2), 1–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Derrida, J. (1976). Of grammatology (G. Spivak, Trans.) Baltimore: John Hopkins. (original work published in 1967).

  15. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and difference (A. Bass, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published on 1967).

  16. Doris, J., Stich, S., Phillips, J., & Walmsley, L. (2017). Moral psychology: Empirical approaches. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-psych-emp/

  17. Dreyfus, L. H., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michael Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Driver, J. (2001). Uneasy virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  19. Driver, J. (2006). Ethics: The fundamentals. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Driver, J. (2014). The history of utilitarianism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2014 ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/utilitarianism-history/

  21. Duignan, B. (2017). Moral psychology. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/science/moral-psychology

  22. Fathabadi, J., Fatemi, A. H., & Pishghadam, R. (2020). How might one live? A Social Theory of Human Motivated Behavior. Human Arenas. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-020-00121-x

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferri, D. (2011). Marx’s labour theory of value and the humbug of liberal thought: Notes on value and bourgeois economics. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/2057602/Davide_Ferri__Marxs_Labour_Theory_of_Value_and_the_Humbug_of_Liberal_Thought

  24. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (A.M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London: Tavistock Publications Limited. (original work published in 1969)

  25. Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge (pp. 107–133). Brighton: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Frankena, W. (1973). Ethics (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the Id. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XIX (1923–1925): The Ego and the Id and Other Works, 1–66.

  28. Gert, B., & Gert, J. (2017). The definition of morality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/morality-definition/

  29. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2017). Sociology (8th ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Milulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Griffin, E. (2012). A first look at communication theory (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Haidt, J. (2012). Righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Haidt, J. (2013). Moral psychology for the twenty-first century. Journal of Moral Education, 42(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2013.817327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20, 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-007-0034-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2004). Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus, 133, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526042365555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Haidt, J., & Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In S. Fiske, D. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 797–832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hemingway, E. (1999). Death in the afternoon. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hitlin, S. (2013). Morality. Oxford Bibliographies in Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756384-0097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. The annual review of sociology, 39, 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hursthous, R., & Pettigrove, G. (2018). Virtue ethics. In E.N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2018 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/

  43. Jacobs, J. (2008). Dimensions of moral theory: An introduction to metaethics and moral psychology. Bodmin, Cornwall: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Karsenti, B. (2012). Durkheim and the moral fact. In D. Fassin (Ed.), A companion to moral anthropology (pp. 21–36). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (Eds.). (2008). Introduction. Handbook of moral development (pp. 1–6). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kingsley, D. (2016). Stoicism: A beginner’s guide to the history and philosophy of Stoicism. Retrieved from https://dl123.zlibcdn.com/download/book/2771160?token=7be41934-0d9c-4eb5-97ea-bd7cb342e8ea

  47. Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Mitra, A. (2015). Epicurean ethics: A relook. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(1), 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moghaddam, F. M. (2005). Great ideas in psychology: A cultural and historical introduction. Oxford, UK: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Mulgan, T. (2001). The demands of consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  52. Nathasnson, S. (2019). Act and rule utilitarianism. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/util-a-r/#H1

  53. Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nietzsche, F. (2009). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to the philosophy of the future (I. Johnston, Trans.). Arlington: Richer Resources Publications. (Original work published in 1886).

  55. Palonen, K. (2004). Max Weber, parliamentarianism and the rhetorical culture of politics. Max Weber Studies, 4(2), 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Parry, R. (2014). Ancient ethical theory. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2014 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ancient/

  57. Piaget, J. (2007). Moral judgment of the child (M. Gabain, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1932).

  58. Piaget, J. (2015). The Language and thought of the child (M. Gabain, Trans). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1923).

  59. Proust, M. (1998). In search of lost time (vol.2): In the shadow of young girls I flower (C.K. Scott Moncrieff, Trans.). New Haven: Yale University Press. (Original work published in 1919).

  60. Ritzer, G. (2008). Sociological theory (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rohlf, M. (2018). Immanuel Kant. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/

  62. Rosen, G., Byrne, A., Cohen, J., Harman, E., & Shiffrin, S. (2018). The Norton introduction to philosophy (2nd ed.). New York: Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Russell, B. (2004). Sceptical essays. New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1928).

  64. Sagan, E. (1988). Freud, women, and morality: The psychology of good and evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Saunders, J.L. (2019). Stoicism. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/Stoicism

  66. Sayer, A. (2010). Class and morality. In S. Hitlin, & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp.163–178). New York: Springer.

  67. Shaw, C. (2019). Ancient ethics. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/a-ethics/

  68. Spinks, L. (2003). Friedrisch Nietzsche. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Stone, L. (2010). Max Weber and the moral idea of society. Journal of Classical Sociology, 10 (2):123–136

  70. Sung Ho, K. (2017). Max Weber. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/weber/

  71. Thurschwell, P. (2000). Sigmund Freud. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Walzer, M. (1989). Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Warburton, N. (2013). Philosophy: The basics (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  74. Weber, M. (2011). The methodology of the social sciences (E. Shils. Ed.& H. Finch, Trans. & Ed.). London: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1949).

  75. Weinstein, J. (2019). Adam Smith. In The Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from: https://www.iep.utm.edu/smith/

  76. Wilde, O. (2000). An ideal husband. New York: Dover publications, Inc. (Original work published in 1895).

  77. Wood, A. (2004). Karl Marx (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neda Moezzipour.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statements

There was no participant involved in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moezzipour, N., Fatemi, A.H. & Ghonsooly, B. Morality Strives to Precede Society But Fails. Hu Arenas (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-021-00211-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Morality
  • Definition
  • Conceptualization
  • Context
  • Action