Skip to main content

How Psychology Repressed Its Founding Father Wilhelm Wundt


The aim of this paper is to shed light on the misrepresented and repressed agenda of Wundt’s psychology—and to pay an overdue tribute to Wundt. Wundt will be analyzed within the history of psychology, i.e., how his views on psychology are represented in textbooks on the history of psychology (Boring, Fancher, Heidbreder, Woodworth and Sheehan) in comparison with his views as expressed in his published works. In the next step, the first attempts to question the traditional historiographic accounts of Wundt will be examined (Blumenthal, Danziger, Greenwood, Woodward). The textual analysis will be embedded in a broader cultural context in order to understand sources of different forms of epistemic injustices committed against Wundt (repression of his ideas, misrecognition, partial reception, even conversion into the opposite of his own views). At the end, some general hermeneutic questions on conditions of understanding and misunderstandings of human subjects and their symbolic products will be addressed, accompanied by a moral appeal to contribute to an academic culture of a just remembrance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Araujo, S. F. (2016) Wundt and the philosophical foundations of psychology: a reappraisal. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

  2. Assmann, A. (2009). Erinnerungsräume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch, E. (1972). Vorlesungen zur Philosophie der Renaissance. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

  4. Blumenthal, A. L. (1975). A reappraisal of Wilhelm Wundt. American Psychologist, 30(11), 1081–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenthal, A. L. (1977). Wilhelm Wundt and early American psychology: a clash of two cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 291, 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenthal, A. L. (1979). The founding father we never knew. Contemporary Psychology, 24(7), 547–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boring, E. (1929). A history of experimental psychology. New York: The Century Co.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boring, E. (1933). The physical dimensions of consciousness. New York: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danziger, K. (1979). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Danziger, K. (1983). Origins and basic principles of Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Danziger, K. (1994). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 331–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Diriwächter, R. (2004). Völkerpsychologie: the synthesis that never was. Culture & Psychology, 10(1), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diriwächter, R. (2012). Völkerpsychologie. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 43–57). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eckardt, G. (2019). Ausgewählte Texte zu Entstehung der Psychologie als Wissenschaft. In memoriam Wilhelm Wundt. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebbinghaus, H. (1908). Abriß der Psychologie. (Outline of psychology). Leipzig: Feit.

  16. Fancher, R. (1990). Pioneers of psychology. (2nd edition). New York & London: W.W. Norton

  17. Fahrenberg, J. (2011). Wilhelm Wundt – Pionier der Psychologie und Außenseiter? Leitgedanken der Wissenschaftskonzeption und deren Rezeptionsgeschichte. e-Buch. PsyDok ZPID Accessed 20 December 2020.

  18. Fahrenberg, J. (2012). Wilhelm Wundts Wissenschaftstheorie der Psychologie. Ein Rekonstruktionsversuch. Psychologische Rundschau, 63(4), 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenwood, J. (2004). Disappearance of the social in American social psychology. West Nyack, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heidbreder, E. (1933/1961). Seven psychologies. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jovanović, G. (1997). Frojd i moderna subjektivnost (Freud and modern subjectivity). Novi Sad & Beograd: Svetovi & Institut za psihologiju.

  22. Jovanović, G. (2019). Wundt’s forgotten legacy and epistemological foundations of critical psychology. In K. Murakami, J. Cresswell, T. Kono, & T. Zitoun (Eds.), The ethos of theorizing (pp. 96–105). Concord: Captus University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jüttemann, G. (2006). Wilhelm Wundt – der missverstandene Geisteswissenschaftler. In: G. Jüttemann (Hrsg.). Wilhelm Wundts anderes Erbe. Ein Missverständnis löst sich auf. (pp.131–143). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

  24. Kusch, M. (1995). Psychologism. A case study in the sociology of philosophy of knowledge. London & New Work: Routledge.

  25. Locke, J. (1690). An essay concerning human understanding. 4th edition 1700. London.

  26. Mischel, T. (1970). Wundt and the conceptual foundations of psychology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 31, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Piaget, J. (1970). Structuralism (C. Maschler, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.

  28. Pickren, W., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. Hoboken, NJ: John Willey & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rieber, R., & Robinson, D. (Eds). (2001). Wilhelm Wundt in history. The making of a scientific psychology. New York: Springer.

  30. Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7, 449–465. Available at Accessed 24 November 2020

  31. Titchener, E. B. (1899). Structural and functional psychology. Philosophical Review, 8, 290–299. Available at Accessed 24 November 2020

  32. Toulmin, S. (1992). Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  33. Valsiner, J. (2012). A guided science: history of psychology in the mirror of its making. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Welzer, H. (Ed). (2001). Das soziale Gedächtnis. Geschichte, Erinnerung, Tradierung. Hamburg: Hamburger Editionen.

  35. Woodworth, R., & Sheehan, M. (1965). Contemporary schools in psychology. London: Methuen & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Woodward, W. (1982). Wundt’s program for the new psychology: vicissitudes of experiment, theory, and system. In W. R. Woodward & M. G. Ash (Eds.), The problematic science: psychology in nineteenth-century thought (pp. 167–197). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wundt, W.(1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.

  38. Wundt, W. (1876). Über den Einfluß der Philosophie auf die Erfahrungswissenschafte Akademische Antrittsrede. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wundt, W. (1880–1883). Logik. Eine Untersuchung der Principien der Erkenntnis und der Methoden der wissenschaftlichen Forschung. Stuttgart: Enke.

  40. Wundt, W. (1900–1920). Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte. (10 Vol.). Stuttgart: Enke.

  41. Wundt, W. (1908). Logik der Geistewissenschaften. Dritte (umgearbeitete). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wundt, W. (1911). Völkerpsychologie. Dritte Auflage. Band. 1. Leipzig: Engelmann.

  43. Wundt, W. (1921). Logik der Geisteswissenschaften. Vierte umgearbeitete Auflage. Stuttgart: Enke.

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordana Jovanović.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jovanović, G. How Psychology Repressed Its Founding Father Wilhelm Wundt. Hu Arenas 4, 32–47 (2021).

Download citation


  • Wilhelm Wundt
  • History of psychology
  • Associationism
  • Individualism
  • Epistemic injustice