Abstract
This article explores how a musical awareness of natural bodily form as an expression of receptive-responsive relationship between stillness and movement can contribute to co-creative dialogue and deep learning that reaches beyond the often superficial knowledge and praxis of intellectually constituted thought and language. It will draw especially on findings from research on the Kokas pedagogy an experiential extension of the Kodaly method of music education combining improvised movement and collective reflection. These findings highlight how the physical dimensions of this pedagogy cultivated new, embodied modes of creative ideation and connectivity, presenting unique challenges and opportunities in the observed educational contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note that the music-movement sessions based on the Kokas pedagogy have been implemented in various settings over the past 50 years. Although the pedagogy has mostly been used in the early and primary years, it was not developed as an age- or stage-specific music pedagogy. Klara Kokas introduced it to older age groups too, including adults. For example, the post-graduate accreditation programme for the Kokas pedagogy itself is grounded in such experience-centred learning and teaching.
This study has been approved by the Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number H11728) and the Ethics Committee of the Liszt Academy of Music. The participants’ (and legal guardians’) informed consent was obtained for the use of small video segments and images in publications and presentations disseminating the findings. In order to protect the anonymity of the participants, fictional names are used. Images and video segments have been distorted.
In Szilvi’s case, imagination and musical focus are intertwined. This is different from the imaginative experience of the solitary boy in Fig. 5, who says he was the sun. In the case of the young boy, there is no observable correspondence between movement and music—and his imaginative experiences will remain disembedded during subsequent sessions.
References
Alexander, R. J. (2017). Towards dialogic teaching: re-thinking classroom talk (5th ed.). York: Dialogos.
Almeida, A., Overy, K., & Miell, D. (2017). Playing with the beat: a process-oriented approach to studying sensorimotor synchronization in early childhood. In M. Lesaffre, M. Leman, & P.-J. Maes (Eds.), The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction. New York: Routledge.
Anttila, E. (2007). Mind the body. Unearthing the affiliation between the conscious body and the reflective mind. In L. Rouhiainen (Ed.), Ways of knowing in dance and art. Theatre Academy: Helsinki.
Anttila, E. (2015). Dance as embodied dialogue. Insights from a school project in Finland. In C. S. Nielsen & S. Burridge (Eds.), Dance education around the world: perspectives on dance. Florence: Taylor and Francis.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: the magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
Barnes, D., & Todd, F. (1995). Communication and learning revisited. New York: Heinemann.
Beard, C., & Wilson, J. (2013). Experiential learning: a handbook for education, training and coaching. London and Philadelphia: Kogan Page.
Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd Edition, trans: Smith, R.G.). Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
Chappell, K., & Craft, A. (2011). Creative learning conversations: producing living dialogic spaces. Educational Research, 53(3), 363–385.
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 345–351.
Clayton, M. (2007). Observing entrainment in music performance: video-based observational analysis of Indian musicians’ tanpura playing and beat marking. Musicae Scientiae, 11(1), 27–60.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. (25th anniversary edition). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: emotions, reason, and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Degerbøl, S., & Svendler Nielsen, C. (2015). Researching embodied learning by using videographic participation for data collection and audiovisual narratives for dissemination—illustrated by the encounter between two acrobats. Ethnography and Education, 10(1), 60–75.
Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. New York: Routledge.
Francesconi, D. (2017). Qualitative methodological issues in studying first-person perspective. Between phenomenological method and cognitive science. In M. Brinkmann & M. F. Buck (Eds.), Pädagogik – Phänomenologie. Verhältnisbestimmungen und Herausforderungen. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: rethinking the mind. Oxford: OUP.
Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2008). The phenomenological mind. London: Routledge.
Gelernter, D. (1994). The muse in the machine: computers and creative thought. London: Fourth Estate.
Gottman, J.M. (1986). The world of coordinated play: same- and cross-sex friendship in young children. In J.M. Gottman & J.G. Parker (Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 139–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hedegaard, M. (2016). Imagination and emotion in children’s play: a cultural-historical approach. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7(2), 57–72.
Johnson, M. (2008). The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Juntunen, M. L., & Westerlund, H. (2011). The legacy of music education methods in teacher education: the metanarrative of Dalcroze. Research Studies in Music Education, 33(1), 47–58.
Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Dell.
Kokas, K. (1999). Joy through the magic of music. Budapest: Alfa Kiadó és Nyomda.
Laban, R., & Ullmann, L. (2011). The mastery of movement. Binsted: Dance Books Ltd..
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Littleton, K., & Mercer, N. (2013). Interthinking. Putting talk to work. London: Routledge.
Matusov, E., & Wegerif, R. (2014). Dialogue on ‘dialogic education’. Has Rupert gone over to the ‘dark side’? Dialogic Pedagogy: An international Online Journal, 2, 1–20.
Meekums, B. (2002). Dance movement therapy. A creative psychotherapeutic approach. London: Sage Publications.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (Ed. by C. Lefort and trans: Lingis, A.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316, 1002–1005.
Nietzsche, F. (2016/1910). The birth of tragedy—or Hellenism and pessimism. Translated by WM.A. Haussmann. [The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Birth of Tragedy, by Friedrich Nietzsche]. Retrieved from: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/51356.
O’Brien, J. E. (2016). Critique of rationality: judgement and creativity from Walter Benjamin to Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Studies in Critical Social Sciences 99. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Pastore, S., & Pentassuglia, M. (2015). Teaching as dance: a case-study for teacher practice analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 16–30.
Pásztor, Z. (2003). Az egészből a részekhez – Kezdeti tapasztalatok a zenei mozgásrögtönzések elemzéséről. Parlando, 2003(4), 2–7.
Payne, P. G. (2010). Remarkable-tracking, experiential education of the ecological imagination. Environmental Education Research [E], 16(3&4), 295–310.
Pentassuglia, M. (2017). Inside the ‘body box’: exploring feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1396442.
Rayner, A. (2017). The origin of life patterns. In the natural inclusion of space in flux. Springer Briefs in Psychology and Cultural Developmental Science. Berlin: Springer.
Rayner, A. (2018). The vitality of the intangible. Crossing the threshold between abstract materialism and natural reality. Human Arenas, 1.
Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius. The creative power of collaboration. New York: Basic Books.
Seddon, F. (2004). Empathetic creativity: the product of empathetic attunement. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative creativity: contemporary perspectives. London: Free Association Books.
Segal, A. & Lefstein, A. (2016). Exuberant, voiceless participation: an unintended consequence of dialogic sensibilities? [Contribution to a special issue on International Perspectives on Dialogic Theory and Practice edited by S. Brindley, M. Juzwik and A. Whitehurst.] L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 16, pp. 1–19.
Smagorinski, P. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: the psychology of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind, Culture and Activity, 18(4), 319–334.
Vass, E. (2007). Exploring processes of collaborative creativity—the role of emotions in children’s joint creative writing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 107–117.
Vass, E. & Deszpot, G. (2015). Opportunities for creative transformations in the Kokas pedagogy. CFMAE The Changing Face of Music and Art Education - Interdisciplinary Journal for Music and Art Pedagogy, 7(2), 38–46.
Vass, E., & Deszpot, G. (2016). Introducing experience-centred approaches in music teacher education—opportunities for pedagogic metamorphosis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23(1), 1–16.
Vass, E., & Deszpot, G. (forthcoming). A teljes figyelem és a flow-élmény a gyermekeknél a Kokas-pedagógiában. In: Váradi Judit–Szűcs Tímea (szerk.): Zenepedagógiai konferencia a felsőfokú tanárképzés 50 éves évfordulója alkalmából. Conference of Music Pedagogy celebrating the 50th anniversary of music teacher education. Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó.
Vass, E., Littleton, K., Miell, D., & Jones, A. (2008). The discourse of collaborative creative writing: peer collaboration as a context for mutual inspiration. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3), 192–202 Special Issue.
Vass, E., Littleton, K., Jones, A., & Miell, D. (2014). The affectively constituted dimensions of creative interthinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 63–77.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In R. Van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 58–78). Cambridge: Blackwell (Original work published in Osnovy Pedologii, Leningrad, Russia: Izdanie Instituta, 1935).
Wegerif, R. (2017). Dialogic education. Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Education. Oxford University Press. Pre-print draft retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319008133_Dialogic_Education_Pre-print_draft.
Funding
The research reported here was supported by Western Sydney University’s Academic Development Programme.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vass, E. Musical Co-creativity and Learning—the Fluid Body Language of Receptive-Responsive Dialogue. Hu Arenas 1, 56–78 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0009-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0009-7