Rendezvous on the geostationary orbit (GEO) is much more complex than that on the low earth orbit and has a higher critical requirement for safety performance. This paper presents a safe scenario design method for GEO rendezvous proximity missions where the safety constraint of a collocated satellite is considered. A recently proposed quantitative index considering trajectory uncertainty is introduced to analyze the safety performance of the scenario parameters including the V-bar keeping positions and the fly-by trajectory radius. Furthermore, an exhaustive analysis is performed to find the dangerous regions of the V-bar keeping positions and the appropriate semi-major axis of the fly-by ellipse, considering the safety requirements of both the target and the collocated satellite. A geometry method is then developed for designing a feasible and suboptimal safe rendezvous scenario. The method is tested by designing four rendezvous scenarios with ±V-bar approach directions respectively in the situations with and without one collocated satellite. Safety performance and velocity increments of the scenarios are compared and a conclusion is reached that the collocated satellite has a significant influence on the scenario design.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Li, H. N. Geostationary Satellites Collocation. New York: Springer, 2014.
Smith, D. A., Martin, C., Kassebom, M., Petersen, H., Shaw, A., Skidmore, B., Smith, D., Stokes, H., Willig, A. A mission to preserve the geostationary region. Advances in Space Research, 2004, 34(5): 1214–1218.
Anderson, P. V., Schaub, H. Local orbital debris flux study in the geostationary ring. Advances in Space Research, 2006, 51(12): 2195–2206.
Xu, W. F., Liang, B., Li, B., Xu, Y. A universal on-orbit servicing system used in the geostationary orbit. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 48(1): 95–119.
Fehse, W. Automated Rendezvous and Docking of Spacecraft. London: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Luo, Y., Zhang, J., Tang, G. Survey of orbital dynamics and control of space rendezvous. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(1): 1–11.
Barbee, B. W., Carpenter, J. R., Heatwole, S., Markley, F. L., Moreau, M., Naasz, B. J., van Eepoel, J. A guidance and navigation strategy for rendezvous and proximity operations with a noncooperative spacecraft in geosynchronous orbit. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2011, 58(3): 389–408.
Li, Y. H., Yang, K. Z., Shan, C. S., Luo, D., Guan, H., Zheng, J., Cheng, H., Man, L. A preliminary study on dead geostationary satellite removal. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(12): 3389–3396.
Tarabini, L., Gil, J., Gandia, F., Molina, M. Á., Cural, J. M. D., Ortega, G. Ground guided CX-OLEV rendezvous with uncooperative geostationary satellite. Acta Astronautica, 2007, 61(1-6): 312–325.
Eckstein, M. C., Rajasingh, C. K., Blumer, P. Colocation strategy and collision avoidance for the geostationary satellites at 19 degrees west. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Space Flight Dynamics, 1989.
Li, H. N., Gao, Z. Z., Li, J. S., Li, Q. J., Xue, D., Li, D. L. Mathematical prototypes for collocating geostationary satellites. Science China Technological Sciences, 2013, 56(5): 1086–1092.
Beigelman, I., Gurfil, P. Optimal geostationary satellite collocation using relative orbital element corrections. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2009, 46(1): 141–150.
Luo, Y.-Z., Lei, Y.-J., Tang, G.-J. Optimal multi-objective nonlinear impulsive rendezvous. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(4): 994–1002.
Breger, L., How, J. P. Safe trajectories for autonomous rendezvous of spacecraft. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, 31(5): 1478–1489.
Ma, L., Meng, X., Liu, Z., Du, L. Suboptimal power-limited rendezvous with fixed docking direction and collision avoidance. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2013, 36(1): 229–239.
Jones, B. A., Doostan, A. Satellite collision probability estimation using polynomial chaos expansions. Advances in Space Research, 2013, 52(11): 1860–1875.
Patera, R. P. Satellite collision probability for nonlinear relative motion. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(5): 728–733.
Luo, Y.-Z., Liang, L.-B., Wang, H., Tang, G.-J. Quantitative performance for spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34(4): 1264–1269.
Sun, Z. J., Luo, Y. Z., Niu, Z. Y. Spacecraft rendezvous trajectory safety quantitative performance index eliminating probability dilution. Science China Technological Sciences, 2014, 57(6): 1219–1228.
Goodman, J. L. History of space shuttle rendezvous and proximity operations. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2006, 43(5): 944–959.
Mulder, T. A. Orbital express autonomous rendezvous and capture flight operations, Part 2 of 2: AR&C exercise 4,5, and end-of-life. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-located Conferences, 2008: AIAA 2008–6768.
Clohessy, W. H., Wiltshire, R. S. Terminal guidance system for satellite rendezvous. Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, 1960, 27(9): 653–658, 674.
Niu, Z. Y. Safety assessment method and design optimization of rendezvous trajectory in view of early warning threshold. Master Thesis. Changsha, China: National University of Defense Technology, 2012. (in Chinese)
Sellmaier, F., Boge, T., Spurmann, J., Gully, S., Rupp, T., Huber, F. On-orbit servicing missions: Challenges and solutions for spacecraft operations. In: Proceedings of the SpaceOps 2010 Conference, 2010: AIAA 2010–2159.
Luo, Y.-Z., Liang, L.-B., Niu, Z.-Y., Tang, G.-J. Safety-optimal linearized impulsive rendezvous with trajectory uncertainties. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2014, 27(6): 04014038.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11572345 and 11402257) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, Grant No. 2013CB733100).
Ya-Zhong Luo received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in aerospace engineering from National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), Hunan, China, in 2001, 2003, and 2007, respectively. Since December 2013, he has been a professor in the College of Aerospace Science and Engineering, NUDT. His current research interests include manned spaceflight mission planning, spacecraft dynamics and control, and evolutionary computation. He was the recipient of the 2010 National Top 100 Doctoral Dissertation Award, the 2012 National Excellent Young Scholars Science Foundation, and the 2014-2016 Most Cited Chinese Researchers (Elsevier).
Zhen-Jiang Sun received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in aerospace engineering from National University of Defense Technology (NUDT), Hunan, China, in 2012 and 2014, respectively. He is now pursuing his Ph.D. degree in aerospace engineering under the supervision of Prof. Ya-Zhong Luo. His current research interests include spacecraft dynamics and control, collision probability, and trajectory optimization.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, YZ., Sun, ZJ. Safe rendezvous scenario design for geostationary satellites with collocation constraints. Astrodyn 1, 71–83 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-017-0006-5
- geostationary orbit (GEO)
- rendezvous and docking (RVD)
- safety performance
- satellite collocation