Skip to main content
Log in

Judging a book by its cover: significance of UX design in gamification and computing systems

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Iran Journal of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are often asked not to judge a book by its cover. However, based on cognitive science, humans broadly connect the performance of a product and its aesthetic appeal by assuming that visually joyful products must be good enough. It is an amalgamation of new-age wireframe technologies, human psychology, design language, realistic feedback testing, and user-centered design. This paper studies the impacts of the new age interaction design on the game industry and computing systems. Gamification is projected as a motivation rostrum through UX while challenging cognitive abilities and developing gameplay as visual appeal, human psychology, voluntary motivation, and engaging interface. This paper envelopes the concept of game design with correspondence to aesthetics and UX, which deals with human–computer interaction and human psychology. The paper covers different sectors of computing systems that deal with the hardware and software, look, feel, accessibility and usability. Additionally, suggesting the UX design department, which has not been in the limelight yet, needs to clinch more significance. The aftermath of this paper points towards creating a comprehensible, urbane life that reflects in the products we utilize, gamification, and hardware and software computing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All relevant data and material are presented in the main paper.

References

  1. Bahr, G.: Editorial: journal of interaction science. J. Interact. Sci. 1, 3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Roto, V., Väänänen, K.: Design-inclusive UX research: design as a part of doing user experience research. Behav. Inf. Technol. 35, 21–37 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1081292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Landers, R.N., Tondello, G.F., Kappen, D.L., Collmus, A.B., Mekler, E.D., Nacke, L.E.: Defining gameful experience as a psychological state caused by gameplay: Replacing the term ‘Gamefulness’ with three distinct constructs. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 81–94 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roto, V., Rautava, M.: User experience elements and brand promise. In: International engagability & design conference, in conjunction with NordiCHI (Vol. 8) (2008)

  6. Law, E.L.-C., van Schaik, P.: Modelling user experience—an agenda for research and practice. Interact. Comput. 22, 313–322 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTCOM.2010.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Clement Gaming—Statistics & Facts | Statista Available online: https://www.statista.com/topics/1680/gaming/. Accessed 02 Nov 2021

  8. Moutinho, G., Azevedo, I.: Practical perspectives on educational theory and game development. In: Marzullo, F.P., Oliveira, F.A. (eds.) Gamification design in education: a case study with moodle, pp. 22–53. IGI Global, Hershey (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reis, C., Ferreira, A.: The relevance of UI/UX design in human-computer interaction of educational games and therapeutic practices, pp. 159–169. Springer, Cham (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kshirsagar, A., Shah, M.: Anatomized study of security solutions for multimedia: deep learning-enabled authentication, cryptography and information hiding. Advanced security solutions for multimedia. IOP Publishing, Bristol (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gray, S.I., Robertson, J., Manches, A., Rajendran, G.: BrainQuest: the use of motivational design theories to create a cognitive training game supporting hot executive function. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 124–149 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rapp, A.: Designing interactive systems through a game lens: an ethnographic approach. Comput. Human Behav. 71, 455–468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.02.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: envisioning future media environments. pp. 9-15 (2011)

  14. van Roy, R., Zaman, B.: Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: a basic psychological needs perspective. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 38–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chittaro, L., Buttussi, F.: Exploring the use of arcade game elements for attitude change: two studies in the aviation safety domain. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 112–123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Featherstone, M., Habgood, J.: UniCraft: exploring the impact of asynchronous multiplayer game elements in gamification. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 150–168 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonigal, J.M.C.: Reality is broken. Inhalt, Cambridge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Xi, W., Gong, H., Wang, Q.: How hand gestures influence the enjoyment in gamified mobile marketing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 169–180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goel, M., Dixit, T., Bajpai, A., Singh, A.: Using gamification to rationalize excessive use of mobile devices among children and adolescents. Int. Conf. Commun. Syst. 2021, 634–637 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSNETS51098.2021.9352888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D.J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., Edwards, T.: Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput. Human Behav. 54, 170–179 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kain, E.: The 20 best video games of 2017. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/games/2017/12/22/the-best-video-games-of-2017/?sh=ae46ed3696f2. Accessed 02 Nov 2021

  22. N.L Why World of Warcraft is good for you. Available online: https://www.economist.com/babbage/2010/09/13/why-world-of-warcraft-is-good-for-you. Accessed 02 Nov 2021

  23. Reiss, S.: Multifaceted nature of intrinsic motivation: the theory of 16 basic desires. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 8, 179–193 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.3.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jo, J., Yi, E., Yang, Y., Choi, S.: Game-based assessment tool using convergence of gamification and motivation theory in intelligent tutoring system. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2021, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/S00779-021-01523-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reiss, S., Sushinsky, L.W.: Overjustification, competing responses, and the acquisition of intrinsic interest. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31, 1116–1125 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Diefenbach, S., Müssig, A.: Counterproductive effects of gamification: an analysis on the example of the gamified task manager Habitica. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 127, 190–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Carroll, J.M.: Community computing as human—computer interaction. Behav. Inf. Technol. 20, 307–314 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110078941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C.: Funology. In: Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Human-computer interaction series, vol. 3. Springer, Dordrecht (2005) . (ISBN 978-1-4020-2966-0)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kshirsagar, A.: Bio-remediation: use of nature in a technical way to fight pollution in the long run. ResearchGate (2018). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26906.70088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Solanki, P., Baldaniya, D., Jogani, D., Chaudhary, B., Shah, M., Kshirsagar, A.: Artificial intelligence: new age of transformation in petroleum upstream. Pet Res (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptlrs.2021.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hassenzahl, M.: The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum. Computer Interact 19, 319–349 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1904_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Pedersen, T., Johansen, C., Jøsang, A.: Behavioural computer science: an agenda for combining modelling of human and system behaviours. Hum. Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 8, 1–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-018-0130-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bahr, G.S., Stary, C.: What is interaction science? Revisiting the aims and scope of JoIS. J. Interact. Sci. 4, 1–19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40166-016-0015-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shtykh, R.Y., Jin, Q.: A human-centric integrated approach to web information search and sharing. Human-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 1, 1–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carroll, R.J., Ruppert, D., Stefanski, L.A.: Adapting for heteroscedasticity in regression models. Ann. Statist. (1982). https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176345987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shah, S., Teja, J.N., Bhattacharya, S.: Towards affective touch interaction: predicting mobile user emotion from finger strokes. J. Interact. Sci. 3, 1–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40166-015-0013-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Williamson, J.R., Brewster, S.: Capturing performative actions for interaction and social awareness, pp. 51–63. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harrison, R., Flood, D., Duce, D.: Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. J. Interact. Sci. 1, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nielsen, J.: Usability inspection methods. In: Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems. ISBN 0-471-01877-5 (1994)

  40. Islam, M.N., Islam, A.K.M.N.: Ontology mapping and semantics of web interface signs. Human-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 6, 20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13673-016-0077-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. van Oostendorp, H., Aggarwal, S.: Modeling and supporting web-navigation. J. Interact. Sci. 3, 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40166-015-0008-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heron, M.J., Hanson, V.L., Ricketts, I.: Open source and accessibility: advantages and limitations. J. Interact. Sci. 1, 2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2194-0827-1-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Verma, P., Singh, R., Singh, A.K.: A framework to integrate speech based interface for blind web users on the websites of public interest. Human-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 3, 1–18 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-3-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. McNaull, J., Augusto, J.C., Mulvenna, M., McCullagh, P.: Flexible context aware interface for ambient assisted living. Human-centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 4, 1–41 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-4-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Gandhinagar Institute of Technology, School of Liberal Studies and School of Technologym Pandit Deendayal Energy University for the permission to publish this research.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors make a substantial contribution to this manuscript. TS, NI, AK and MS participated in drafting the manuscript. TS and NI wrote the main manuscript; all the authors discussed the results and implication on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manan Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sushra, T., Iyengar, N., Shah, M. et al. Judging a book by its cover: significance of UX design in gamification and computing systems. Iran J Comput Sci 5, 117–126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-021-00096-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42044-021-00096-0

Keywords

Navigation