Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Big data in social and psychological science: theoretical and methodological issues

  • Survey Article
  • Published:
Journal of Computational Social Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Big data presents unprecedented opportunities to understand human behavior on a large scale. It has been increasingly used in social and psychological research to reveal individual differences and group dynamics. There are a few theoretical and methodological challenges in big data research that require attention. In this paper, we highlight four issues, namely data-driven versus theory-driven approaches, measurement validity, multi-level longitudinal analysis, and data integration. They represent common problems that social scientists often face in using big data. We present examples of these problems and propose possible solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan, D. (1998). The conceptualization and analysis of change over time: An integrative approach incorporating longitudinal means and covariance structures analysis (LMACS) and multiple indicator latent growth modeling (MLGM). Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 421–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, D. (2005). Current directions in personnel selection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 220–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan, D. (2010). Advances in analytical strategies. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, D. (2013). Advances in modeling dimensionality and dynamics of job performance. In K. J. Ford, J. Hollenbeck, & A. M. Ryan (Eds.), The psychology of work. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chan, D. (2014). Time and methodological choices. In A. J. Shipp & Y. Fried (Eds.), Time and work: How time impacts groups, organizations, and methodological choices (Vol. 2, pp. 146–176). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheung, M. W. L., & Jak, S. (2016). Analyzing big data in psychology: A split/analyze/meta-analyze approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Doré, B., Ort, L., Braverman, O., & Ochsner, K. N. (2015). Sadness shifts to anxiety over time and distance from the national tragedy in Newtown. Connecticut. Psychological Science, 26(4), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614562218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, W., Qiu, L., Chiu, C-y, & Yang, Y. (2015). Diffusion of opinions in a complex culture system: Implications for emergence of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(10), 1252–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ginsberg, J., Mohebbi, M. H., Patel, R. S., Brammer, L., Smolinski, M. S., & Brilliant, L. (2009). Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature, 457(7232), 1012–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Golder, S. A., & Macy, M. W. (2011). Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science, 333(6051), 1878–1881. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hodas, N. O., & Lerman, K. (2014). The simple rules of social contagion. Scientific Reports, 4, 4343. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. IDC. (2010, May). The digital universe decadeAre you ready? Retrieved Nov 23, 2017, from https://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/idc-digital-universe-are-you-ready.pdf.

  14. Jackson, J. C., Rand, D., Lewis, K., Norton, M. I., & Gray, K. (2017). Agent-based modeling: A guide for social psychologists. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617691100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kern, M. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., Schwartz, H. A., Park, G., Ungar, L. H., Stillwell, D. J., et al. (2014). From “sooo excited!!!” to “so proud”: Using language to study development. Developmental Psychology, 50, 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., et al. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin, H., Tov, W., & Qiu, L. (2014). Emotional disclosure on social networking sites: The role of network structure and psychological needs. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 342–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, P., Tov, W., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., & Qiu, L. (2015). Do Facebook status updates reflect subjective well-being? Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7), 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, L., Preotiuc-Pietro, D., Riahi Samani, Z., Moghaddam, M. E., & Ungar, L. (2016). Analyzing personality through social media profile picture choice. In Tenth international AAAI conference on web and social media.

  23. Nai, J., Narayanan, J., Hernandez, I., & Savani, K. (in press). People in more racially diverse neighborhoods are more prosocial. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

  24. Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Kern, M. L., Weingarten, E., Eichstaedt, J. C., et al. (2017). Living in the past, present, and future: Measuring temporal orientation with language. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. (LIWC.net, Austin, TX). Retrieved Nov 23, 2017, from www.liwc.net/LIWC2007LanguageManual.pdf.

  26. Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K.-Y., & Tov, W. (2012). Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 569–572. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qiu, L., Lin, H., Ramsay, J., & Yang, F. (2012). You are what you Tweet: Personality expression and perception on Twitter. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(6), 710–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. K.-Y. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Qiu, L., Lu, J., Yang, S., Qu, W., & Zhu, T. (2015). What does your selfie say about you? Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 443–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rentfrow, P. J., & Jokela, M. (2016). Geographical psychology: The spatial organization of psychological phenomena. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 393–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., et al. (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tov, W., Ng, K. L., Lin, H., & Qiu, L. (2013). Detecting well-being via computerized content analysis of brief diary entries. Journal of Personality Assessment, 25(4), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033007.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wojcik, S. P., Hovasapian, A., Graham, J., Motyl, M., & Ditto, P. (2015). Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness. Science, 347(6227), 1243–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yarkoni, T., & Westfall, J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(4), 1036–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Qiu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, L., Chan, S.H.M. & Chan, D. Big data in social and psychological science: theoretical and methodological issues. J Comput Soc Sc 1, 59–66 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-017-0013-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-017-0013-6

Keywords

Navigation