Hormones

pp 1–5 | Cite as

Conversation Maps™, an effective tool for the management of males and females with type 2 diabetes and mildly impaired glycemic control

  • Giuseppe Defeudis
  • Yeganeh Manon Khazrai
  • Claudia Di Rosa
  • Chiara Secchi
  • Anna Montedoro
  • Anna Rita Maurizi
  • Andrea Palermo
  • Paolo Pozzilli
  • Silvia Manfrini
Original article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational tool, Conversation Maps™ (CM), combined with a weight loss program, in improving metabolic control of as well as knowledge about diabetes, in a population with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) with mildly impaired glycemic control.

Methods

This is a longitudinal observational study in which 66 subjects, aged 67.8 ± 7.93, were included either in the educational program with CM, once weekly for 4 weeks (T4), combined with a weight loss regime (group A, n = 32), or in standard care with a weight loss regime (group B, n = 34), both followed for 3 months (T3M) after T4.

Results

At T4, both groups A and B had significantly lost weight and reduced waist circumference. However, group B did not lose weight or reduce waist circumference at T3M compared to T4. At T3M, only group A significantly lowered glycated hemoglobin (A1c) from baseline. At T3M, only group A had a significant increase in knowledge on diabetes therapy and foot care.

Conclusions

CM may also play a significant role in T2DM characterized by mildly impaired glycemic control. Moreover, a systematic use of CM could be suggested for management of diabetes together with lifestyle changes and a weight loss diet.

Keywords

Conversation maps Education Diabetes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Francesca Mosaico and Elena Roncella contributed to our study during the recruitment phase.

Compliance with ethical standards

The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines and approved by the Institutional Review Board of University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome.

Conflict of interest

GD: nothing to declare; YMK: nothing to declare; CDR: nothing to declare; CS: nothing to declare; AM: nothing to declare; ARM: nothing to declare; AP: nothing to declare; PP: nothing to declare; SM: Lilly.

References

  1. 1.
    Federation ID. IDF Diabetes Atlas. Seventh edition ed 2015: www.diabetesatlas.org. Accessed 21/11/2017
  2. 2.
    (2014) Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 37(Suppl 1):81–90Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agrusta AFC, Rossi A, Scarpa L, 2009 Il programma educazionale strutturato Diabetes Conversation Maps nella gestione terapeutica del Diabete Mellito tipo 2. Paper presented at: Congresso AMD 2009; Rimini, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ghafoor E, Riaz M, Eichorst B, Fawwad A, Basit A (2015) Evaluation of diabetes conversation map™ education tools for diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Spectr 28:230–235CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ciardullo AV, Daghio MM, Fattori G, Giudici G, Rossii L, Vagnini C (2010) Effectiveness of the kit conversation map in the therapeutic education of diabetic people attending the diabetes unit in carpi, Italy. Recenti Prog Med 101:471–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Srulovici E, Kay C, Rotem M, Golfenshtein N, Balicer R, Shadmi E (2015) Diabetes Conversation Maps and health outcomes: a systematic literature review. Value Health 1):A617–618Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vespasiani G, Nicolucci A, Erle G, Trento M, Miselli V (2002) Validazione del questionario sulla conoscenza del diabete GISED 2001. Giorn It Diabetol 22:109–120Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rotter JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monogr 80:1–28CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sperl-Hillen J, Beaton S, Fernandes O et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of patient education methods for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171:2001–2010CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Penalba M, Moreno L, Cobo A et al (2014) Impact of the <<Conversation Map>> tools on understanding of diabetes by Spanish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, comparative study. Endocrinol Nutr 61:505–515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin Y, Xu Y, Chen G, Huang B, Chen Z, Yao L (2012) Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular risk in a cross-sectional study among She Chinese population. J Endocrinol Investig 35:35–41Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hellenic Endocrine Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Defeudis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yeganeh Manon Khazrai
    • 1
  • Claudia Di Rosa
    • 1
  • Chiara Secchi
    • 1
  • Anna Montedoro
    • 1
  • Anna Rita Maurizi
    • 1
  • Andrea Palermo
    • 1
  • Paolo Pozzilli
    • 1
  • Silvia Manfrini
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of MedicineUniversity Campus Bio-Medico di RomaRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Experimental MedicineSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations