Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health-related quality-of-life trajectories during/after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
European Geriatric Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 May 2023

This article has been updated

Key summary points

AbstractSection Aim

To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) trajectory during the first year after cancer treatment in patients with resectable primary colon cancer.

AbstractSection Findings

On average, HR-QoL recovered to baseline level one year after start of treatment. However, 1 out of 7 patients, particularly older patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, were at risk of non-resilience or a late decline in HR-QoL.

AbstractSection Message

Our findings provide insight in risks for a permanent loss of HR-QoL which may support patients and physicians in the treatment decision-making process to optimize tailored cancer care.

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate quality of life trajectory during the first year after surgical treatment in patients with resectable primary colon cancer.

Methods

Patients with resectable primary colon cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 who received surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy if indicated were selected from the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort study (PLCRC). Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) was assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire before surgery, and three and twelve months after surgery. HR-QoL scores varied between 0 and 100 and outcomes were compared according to age (< 70 years, ≥ 70 years), comorbidity (yes, no) and treatment type (adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical treatment only). The extent of resilience, defined as a recovery of HR-QoL to baseline level after a clinically relevant decline in HR-QoL at months, was calculated twelve months post-surgery.

Results

For all 458 patients, the mean age was 66.4 years (SD 9.5), 40% were aged 70 years and older and 68% were men. Baseline level of HR-QoL summary score was relatively high with a mean of 87.9 (SD 11.5), and did not significantly differ between older and younger patients. The strongest decline of HR-QoL compared to baseline was observed at three months with a gradual recovery over time. Fourteen percent of all patients were non-resilient or showed a late decline at twelve months post-surgery. Compared to younger patients, older patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were less resilient (respectively, 53 and 32%, p = 0.07) and at risk of a late decline in HR-QoL 1 year post-surgery (respectively, 3% versus 16%, p = 0.02). Comorbidity status had no significant impact on the HR-QoL trajectory.

Conclusion

Colon cancer treatment was associated with a decline in HR-QoL three months post-surgery, but most patients return to baseline level within twelve months. Still, particularly older patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were less resilient and at risk of a late decline in HR-QoL. These data could help in patients counselling regarding colon cancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) and Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort (PLCRC).

Change history

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute NC. Cancer Stat Facts [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jul 21]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov

  3. Kankerregistratie N. Cijfers over kanker [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 2]. Available from: https://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/

  4. Federatie Medisch specialisten. Colorectal Cancer Dutch Guideline Oncoline version 3.0 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.nhg.org/sites/default/files/content/nhg_org/uploads/colorectaalcarcinoom.pdf

  5. Scher KS, Hurria A (2012) Under-representation of older adults in cancer registration trials: known problem, little progress. J Clin Oncol 30(17):2036–2038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurria A, Mohile SG, Dale W (2012) Research priorities in geriatric oncology: addressing the needs of an aging population. JNCCN J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 10(2):286–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamaker ME, Prins MC, Schiphorst AH, van Tuyl SAC, Pronk A, van den Bos F (2015) Long-term changes in physical capacity after colorectal cancer treatment. J Geriatr Oncol 6:153–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Couwenberg AM, Burbach JPM, van Grevenstein WMU, Smits AB, Consten ECJ, Schiphorst AHW et al (2018) Effect of neoadjuvant therapy and rectal surgery on health-related quality of life in patients with rectal cancer during the first 2 years after diagnosis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17(3):500–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Montroni I, Ugolini G, Saur NM, Rostoft S, Antonino Spinelli BLVL (2022) Quality of life in older adults after major cancer surgery: the GOSAFE international study. J Natl Cancer Inst 114(7):969–978

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bours MJL, Linden BWA, Winkels RM, Duijnhoven FJ, Mols F, Roekel EH et al (2016) Candidate predictors of health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. Oncologist 21:433–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cummings A, Grimmett C, Calman L, Patel M, Permyakova NV, Winter J et al (2018) Comorbidities are associated with poorer quality of life and functioning and worse symptoms in the 5 years following colorectal cancer surgery: Results from the ColoREctal Well-being (CREW) cohort study. Psychooncology 27(10):2427–2435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wheelwright S, Permyakova NV, Calman L, Din A, Fenlon D, Richardson A et al (2020) Does quality of life return to pre-treatment levels 5 years after curative intent surgery for colorectal cancer? Evidence from the ColoREctal Wellbeing (CREW) study. PLoS ONE 15(4):e0231332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. van der Vlies E, Vernooij LM, Hamaker ME, van der Velden AMT, Smits M, Intven MPW et al (2022) Frailty and health related quality of life three months after non-metastatic colorectal cancer diagnosis in older patients: a multi-centre prospective observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 13(1):74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamura S, Suzuki K, Ito Y, Fukawa A (2021) Factors related to the resilience and mental health of adult cancer patients: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 29(7):3471–3486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gijzel SMW, Whitson HE, van de Leemput IA, Scheffer M, van Asselt D, Rector JL et al (2019) Resilience in clinical care: getting a grip on the recovery potential of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 67(12):2650–2657

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Seiler A, Jenewein J (2019) Resilience in cancer patients. Front Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheepers ERM, Vink GR, Schiphorst AHW, Emmelot-Vonk MH, van Huis-Tanja LH, Hamake ME (2022) The impact of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with colon cancer: changes at group-level versus individual-level. Eur J Cancer Care 31(6):e13691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burbach JPM, Kurk SA, van Coeberghden Braak RRJ, Dik VK, May AM, Meijer GA et al (2016) Prospective Dutch colorectal cancer cohort: an infrastructure for long-term observational, prognostic, predictive and (randomized) intervention research. Acta Oncol (Madr). 55(11):1273–1280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL). Cijfers over Kanker [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jan 6]. Available from: https://www.iknl.nl/nkr-cijfers

  20. NVVH. Colorectaal Carcinoom [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jun 4]. Available from: https://richtlijnendatabase.nl/richtlijn/colorectaal_carcinoom_crc/startpagina_-_crc.html

  21. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL TA. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://cancerstaging.org/references-tools/deskreferences/Documents/AJCC 7th Ed Cancer Staging Manual.pdf

  23. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A (2001) on behalf of the EORTC quality of lifr group. The EORTIC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd Edition). Europen Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer, Brussels

  25. Giesinger JM, Kieffer JM, Fayers PM, Groenvold M, Petersen MA, Scott NW et al (2016) Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust. J Clin Epidemiol 69:79–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, St-James MM, Fayers PM, Brown JM (2011) Evidence-based guidelines for determination of sample size and interpretation of the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. J Clin Oncol 29(1):89–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 41(5):582–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cabilan CJ, Hines S (2017) The short-term impact of colorectal cancer treatment on physical activity, functional status and quality of life: a systematic review. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep 15(2):517–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz CE, Bode R, Repucci N, Becker J, Sprangers MAG, Fayers PM (2006) The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift. Qual Life Res 15(9):1533–1550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fried TR, Bradley EH, Towle VR, Allore H (2002) Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously Ill patients. N Engl J Med 346(14):1061–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wildiers H, Mauer M, Pallis A, Hurria A, Mohile SG, Luciani A et al (2013) End points and trial design in geriatric oncology research: a joint European organisation for research and treatment of cancer-alliance for clinical trials in oncology-international society of geriatric oncology position article. J Clin Oncol 31(29):3711–3718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schnipper LE, Davidson NE, Wollins DS, Blayney DW, Dicker AP, Ganz PA et al (2016) Updating the American society of clinical oncology value framework: revisions and reflections in response to comments received. J Clin Oncol 34(24):2925–2934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scheepers ERM, van Huis-Tanja LH, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Hamaker ME (2021) Study objectives in clinical trials in older patients with solid malignancies: do we measure what matters? Qual Life Res 30(7):1833–1839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, Cohen HJ, Droz JP, Lichtman S et al (2005) Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International society of geriatric oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55(3):241–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. MacLeod S, Musich S, Hawkins K, Alsgaard K, Wicker ER (2016) The impact of resilience among older adults. Geriatr Nurs (Minneap) 37:266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the registration team of Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) and investigators of the Prospective Dutch ColoRectal Cancer cohort for the collection of data.

Funding

Dr. Vink reports grants from Servier, grants from BMS, grants from Merck, grants from Sirtex, grants from Bayer, grants from PGDx, from Pierre-Fabre, outside the submitted work; all other authors have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ES: study design, data analysis, writing, and tables/figures. GV: writing and approval of final document. AS: writing and approval of final document. ME: writing and approval of final document. LH: writing and approval of final document. MH: study design, writing, and approval of final document.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. R. M. Scheepers.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research commitee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All patients provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: plus the same explanatory text of the problem as in the erratum/correction article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary data Figure S1. Patient selection (PPTX 52 KB)

41999_2023_750_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Supplementary data Table S1. Clinically relevant differences of HR-QoL at twelve months compared to baseline level, stratified by age. (docx 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheepers, E.R.M., Vink, G.R., Schiphorst, A.H.W. et al. Health-related quality-of-life trajectories during/after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer. Eur Geriatr Med 14, 565–572 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00750-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-023-00750-9

Keywords

Navigation