Skip to main content

The hospital cost of hip replacement for old inpatients in Belgium

Abstract

Introduction

The objectives of this research are (i) to describe the medico-administrative characteristics of inpatients aged 65 and more who are hospitalized for hip joint replacement, (ii) to evaluate the complete hospital cost into costs of medical procedures, drugs costs, prostheses costs, and the administrative costs, and (iii) to identify and to evaluate from administrative database predictors influencing the complete hospital costs.

Methods

The study was based on 961 inpatient stays aged 65 and more, with the APR-DRG 301 “Hip joint replacement”. The sample for this study was based on data collected in 2014 among nine Belgian general hospitals. We used the linear regression method for isolating predictors of hospital cost.

Results

The study highlights three different types of patients hospitalized for hip replacement, depending on the primary diagnosis: osteoarthritis problems (57%), femur neck fracture (30%), or other reasons (13%) (complications, infections, or problems with the existing hip prosthesis). The median length of stay (P25–P75) was 9 days (6.29–20.91). The median cost (P25–P75) was 8,023.91 EUR (6678.32–13,670.78). The total cost was composed of the direct hospital cost (30%), the cost of medical procedures (31%), cost of drugs (4%), the cost of hip prosthesis (18%), and other costs (17%). The linear regression reveals that an extreme SOI or risk of mortality, an ICU stay, an in-hospital death, an index of Charlson comorbidities of 4 or 5, to be hospitalized for a hip replacement because of complications, infections, or problems with the existing hip prosthesis, and the length of stay, were predictors of an increase in hospital cost.

Conclusion

The cost is not increasing with the age of the patient, but mainly with the length of stay and the comorbidities linked to the age which are considered in the severity of illness and the Charlson comorbidities index. The hospital cost is higher for patients hospitalized for complications linked to an existing hip prosthesis than for a hip replacement linked to osteoarthritis problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(3):364–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nguyen-Oghalai TU, Ottenbacher KJ, Granger CV, Smith ST, Goodwin JS (2006) Impact of osteoarthritis on rehabilitation for persons with hip fracture. Arthritis Care Res 55(6):920–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prieto-Alhambra D, Javaid MK, Judge A, Maskell J, Kiran A, de Vries F et al (2011) Fracture risk before and after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: potential benefits of bisphosphonate use. Arthritis Rheum 63(4):992–1001

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. OECD (2017) Hip and knee replacement. In: Health at a glance 2017. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 178–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2017-65-en

  5. Chong EW, Wang Y, Robman LD, Aung KZ, Makeyeva GA, Giles GG et al (2015) Age related macular degeneration and total hip replacement due to osteoarthritis or fracture: melbourne collaborative cohort study. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0137322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Pierdomenico L, Uwiteka I, Senterre C, Leclercq P, da Costa EM, Pepersack T et al (2015) Évaluation économique des lésions associées aux chutes des personnes âgées vivant à domicile. Gériatrie Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil 13(1):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  7. Castelli A, Daidone S, Jacobs R, Kasteridis P, Street AD (2015) The determinants of costs and length of stay for hip fracture patients. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0133545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanna S, Wittenauer R, Smith L, Aden K (2013) Chapter 6.12 Osteoarthritis—background paper. In: Priority medicines for Europe and the world. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_12Osteo.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 2 July 2018

  9. Ackaert K, de Béthune X (2009) Prothèses totales de hanche en Belgique: analyse de suivi. Partie 1. Nombre de prothèses de hanche et coût d’une prothèses totale de hanche. MC-inform 236:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stargardt T (2008) Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries. Health Econ 17(S1):S9–S20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moore J, Carmody O, Carey B, Harty JA, Reidy D (2017) The cost and mortality of hip fractures in centenarians. Ir J Med Sci 186:961–964

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anckaert K, de Béthune X (2015) MC-étude prothèse totale de hanche? Nicolas a une hanche qui flanche. MC-inform 261:23–36

    Google Scholar 

  13. Titler M, Dochterman J, Kim T, Kanak M, Shever L, Picone DM et al (2007) Cost of care for seniors hospitalized for hip fracture and related procedures. Nurs Outlook 55(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikkel LE, Fox EJ, Black KP, Davis C, Andersen L, Hollenbeak CS (2012) Impact of comorbidities on hospitalization costs following hip fracture. J Bone Jt Surg-Am 94(1):9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feedback financier par pathologie - APR-DRG 301 Remplacement d’articulation de hanche. Banque Nationale de Données Diagnostic médical/Soins & coût. (2014). https://tct.fgov.be/webetct/etct-web/html/fr/index.jsp. Accessed 7 June 2018

  16. Johansson T, Bachrach-Lindström M, Aspenberg P, Jonsson D, Wahlström O (2006) The total costs of a displaced femoral neck fracture: comparison of internal fixation and total hip replacement. Int Orthop 30(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haentjens P, Lamraski G, Boonen S (2005) Costs and consequences of hip fracture occurrence in old age: an economic perspective. Disabil Rehabil 27(18–19):1129–1141

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pirson M, Leclercq P (2014) Un projet pilote d’évaluation des coûts par pathologie, le projet PACHA. Healthc Exec 78:12–14

    Google Scholar 

  19. Service Public Fédéral, Santé Publique, Sécurité de la Chaîne Alimentaire et Environnement, Organisation des établissements de soins, UZ Leuven (2017) Rapport project team APR-DRG I. La comparaison et la signification des résultats du grouper entre les versions APR-DRG 15.0 et 28.0 sur la base d’ICD-9-CM. Louvain; 2013. https://www.health.belgium.be/sites/default/files/uploads/fields/fpshealth_theme_file/icd-10-be_rapport_de_recherche_-_2012.pdf. Accessed 30 October 2017

  20. Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43(11):1130–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruiz M, Bottle A, Long S, Aylin P (2015) Multi-morbidity in hospitalised older patients: who are the complex elderly? PLoS ONE 10(12):e0145372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Padrón-Monedero A, López-Cuadrado T, Galán I, Martínez-Sánchez EV, Martin P, Fernández-Cuenca R (2017) Effect of comorbidities on the association between age and hospital mortality after fall-related hip fracture in elderly patients. Osteoporos Int 28(5):1559–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Foor J, Leclercq P, Van Den Bulcke J, Pirson M (2018) Impact des patients « bed blockers » sur les coûts hospitaliers et évaluation des obstacles à la sortie, étude prospective au sein de quatre hôpitaux belges. J Gest D’Écon Méd 35(4–5):179–196

    Google Scholar 

  25. Autier P, Haentjens P, Bentin J, Baillon JM, Grivegnée AR, Closon MC et al (2000) Costs induced by hip fractures: a prospective controlled study in Belgium. Osteoporos Int 11(5):373–380

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bozic KJ, Katz P, Cisternas M, Ono L et al (2005) Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 87(3):570–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Block M (2015) Réforme du financement des hôpitaux. Association belge des hôpitaux. http://www.hospitals.be/images_produit/upload_fichier/334_2015-Congress-FR-Maggie-De-Blok.pdf. Accessed 22 August 2016

  28. Scheerlinck T (2005) Meer revalidatiecentra kunnen kostprijs van heupfractuur en heupprothesechirurgie verminderen. Vrije Universiteit Brussel

  29. de Béthune X, Ackaert K (2015) Étude MC prothèse totale de hanche - 24 ans d’analyses : l’étape suivante d’une collaboration transparente et équilibrée entre soignants et soignés et entre hôpitaux et mutualités. Mutualité Chrétienne. https://www.mc.be/actualite/communique-presse/2015/prothese-hanche#

  30. Ackaert K, de Béthune X, Mertens R (2009) Prothèses totales de hanche en Belgique : analyse de suivi. Partie 2. Variation des types de prothèses et durée de survie. MC-inform 238:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pioli G, Bendini C, Pignedoli P, Giusti A, Marsh D (2018) Orthogeriatric co-management—managing frailty as well as fragility. Injury 49(8):1398–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabharwal S, Wilson H (2015) Orthogeriatrics in the management of frail older patients with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int 26(10):2387–2399

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Petermans J (2014) Place du gériatre dans la filière de soins. Rev Méd Liège 69:5–6

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pepersack T (2013) Ortho-geriatrie: les preuves du concept. Rev Méd Brux 34(1):38–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan L, Wong S, Kwek E (2017) Inpatient cost for hip fracture patients managed with an orthogeriatric care model in Singapore. Singapore Med J 58(3):139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pueyo-Sánchez M-J, Larrosa M, Surís X, Sánchez-Ferrin P, Bullich-Marin I, Frigola-Capell E et al (2018) Association of orthogeriatric services with long-term mortality in patients with hip fracture. Eur Geriatr Med 9(2):175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie De Foor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and informed consent

The patient records used in this retrospective study were fully anonymized by the hospitals before we accessed them. The research team does not have any access to the name, the ID number, or personal medical files of inpatients. For this retrospective study, ethical approval and informed consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Foor, J., Van Wilder, P., Leclercq, P. et al. The hospital cost of hip replacement for old inpatients in Belgium. Eur Geriatr Med 10, 67–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-018-0150-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-018-0150-3

Keywords

  • Hospital cost
  • Hip fracture
  • Hip osteoarthritis
  • Hip replacement
  • Older patient