Advertisement

Happiness of the oldest-old men is associated with fruit and vegetable intakes

  • Satu K. Jyväkorpi
  • A. Urtamo
  • K. H. Pitkälä
  • T. E. Strandberg
Research Paper
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Positive emotions and happiness may improve health and prolong life. Diet quality, Mediterranean dietary pattern, fruit and vegetable, chocolate, and fish consumption have been linked to positive affect, improved mood, and reduced risk of depression. We examined the associations between diet, nutrition, and perceived happiness in the oldest-old men.

Methods

The participants in this cross-sectional analysis were the oldest-old, home-dwelling men (n = 338, mean age 88 years, range 82–97 years) from the longitudinal Helsinki Businessmen Study cohort. In 2016, a postal health and nutrition survey was performed. Happiness was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale of Happiness (0–100 mm). The nutrition survey included a 3-day food diary, Mediterranean Diet Adherence score, and Index of Diet Quality designed to measure adherence to Finnish dietary recommendations. The participants were divided into quartiles according to happiness scores, and diet quality scores, food intakes, and other indicators were compared between the happiness quartiles.

Results

Happiness was linearly associated with total fruit and vegetable intakes (p = 0.002) and inversely associated with age (p = 0.016), blood glucose levels (p = 0.049), skipping lunch (p = 0.023), reduced food intake (p = 0.002), and weight loss (p = 0.016).

Conclusions

Fruit and vegetable intakes indicated happiness in the oldest-old men while reduced food intakes and weight loss were inversely associated with happiness. Maintaining good nutrition and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption may be important for psychological health of older people.

Keywords

Happiness Fruits and vegetables intake Oldest-old men Nutrition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Päivikki and Sakari Sohlberg Foundation and Helsinki University Hospital EVO-funding. The sponsors did not have any role in the study design, analysis or interpretation of data, nor in writing the report or the decision to submit this article. The authors were independent researchers not associated with the funders.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

SKJ: reports no conflict of interest. AU: reports no conflict of interest. KHP: reports no conflict of interest. TES: reports having various educational and consultative cooperation with several companies, including Nutricia, Abbott, Amgen, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis, and Novo-Nordisk; a minor amount of stock in Orion Pharma; and is a board member and former president of executive board of European Union Geriatric Medicine Society which has cooperation also with the nutrition industry.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Medicine.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim ES, Hagan KA, Grodstein F, DeMeo DL, De Vivo I, Kubzansky LD (2017) Optimism and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 185(1):21–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barak Y (2006) The immune system and happiness. Autoimmun Rev 5(8):523–527CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DuBois CM, Lopez OV, Beale EE, Healy BC, Boehm JK, Huffman JC (2015) Relationships between positive psychological constructs and health outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Int J Cardiol 195:265–280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ironson G, Banerjee N, Fitch C, Krause N (2018) Positive emotional well-being, health behaviors, and inflammation measured by C-reactive protein. Soc Sci Med 197:235–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huffman JC, Legler SR, Boehm JK (2017) Positive psychological well-being and health in patients with heart disease: a brief review. Future Cardiol.  https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2017-0016 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schutte NS, Palanisamy SK, McFarlane JR (2016) The relationship between positive psychological characteristics and longer telomeres. Psychol Health 31(12):1466–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanskanen A, Hibbeln JR, Tuomilehto J, Uutela A, Haukkala A, Viinamäki H et al (2001) Fish consumption and depressive symptoms in the general population in Finland. Psychiatr Serv 52(4):529–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ford PA, Jaceido-Siegl K, Lee JW, Youngberg W, Tonstad S (2013) Intake of Mediterranean foods associated with positive affect and low negative affect. J Psychosom Res 74(2):142–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mujcic R, Oswald AJ (2016) Evolution of well-being and happiness after increases in consumption of fruit and vegetables. Am J Public Health 106(8):1504–1510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slavin JL, Lloyed B, Hammond BR (2012) Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv Nutr 3(4):506–516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Strandberg TE, Salomaa V, Strandberg AY, Vanhanen H, Sarna S, Pitkälä K et al (2016) Cohort profile: the Helsinki Businessmen Study (HBS). Int J Epidemiol 45:1074CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benseñor IM, Pereira AC, Tannuri AC, Valeri CM, Akashi D, Fucciolo DQ et al (1998) Systemic arterial hypertension and psychiatric morbidity in the outpatient care setting of a tertiary hospital. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 56:406–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede JL (1999) The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition 15(2):116–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martínez-González MA, García-Arellano A, Toledo E, Salas-Salvadó J, Buil-Cosiales P, Corella D et al (2012) A 14-item Mediterranean Diet Assessment Tool and Obesity Indexes among high-risk subjects: the PREDIMED trial. PLoS One 8:e43134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mäkelä J, Langström H, Laitinen K (2012) Uusi ruokavalion laadun mittari ravitsemusohjauksen tueksi. Lääkärilehti 3:161–163 (in Finnish) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomez-Pinilla F, Nguyen TTJ (2012) Natural mood foods: the actions of polyphenols against psychiatric and cognitive disorders. Nutr Neurosci 15(3):127–133CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Strandberg TE, Strandberg AY, Pitkälä K, Salomaa VV, Tilvis RS, Miettinen TA (2008) Chocolate, well-being and health among elderly men. Eur J Clin Nutr 62(2):247–253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Helldán A, Raulio S, Kosola M, Tapanainen H, Tapanainen H, Ovaskainen M-L, Virtanen S. Finravinto 2012–tutkimus. The National FINDIET 2012 Survey. Raportti 16/2013, 187 p. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinninlaitos (THL), Helsinki, 2013. (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Medical Research Council (MRC). Dietary Assessment 2018. http://dapa-toolkit.mrc.ac.uk/. Accessed 15 Mar 2018

Copyright information

© European Geriatric Medicine Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satu K. Jyväkorpi
    • 1
  • A. Urtamo
    • 1
  • K. H. Pitkälä
    • 1
  • T. E. Strandberg
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Unit of Primary Health Care, Department of General Practice and Primary Health CareHelsinki University Central Hospital, University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.University of Helsinki, Clinicum and Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  3. 3.Center for Life Course Health ResearchUniversity of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations