Skip to main content
Log in

The Political Economy of the Anti-Chinese Movement in California in the Nineteenth Century

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882 painted one of the most unsettling themes in the history of discrimination against ethnic minorities in the nineteenth century. The enactment marked the first federal legislation to prevent the immigration of laborers of a specific ethnic group. This paper develops a model to study the anti-Chinese movement in California by drawing on the previous literature. The model suggests that adverse economic conditions in the labor market, direct competition between Chinese workers and native workers, well-organized native labor, and durable legislation can explain why there was a three-decade time lag between the first wave of Chinese agitation and the passage of the exclusion act. It can also explain why organized labor could influence politics in California.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1
Graph 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 1860, more than a quarter of labor force in the mining industry were Chinese origins.

  2. Interestingly, while Fong and Markham (1991) propose that the growth rate of immigration could lead to significant numbers of conflicts in their model, they conclude that “nothing to suggest that the growth rate (of Chinese immigration) had a significant effect on either conflict or discrimination” (Markham and Fong, 1991: 486).

  3. An act for the better regulation of the mines and the government of foreign miners

  4. An act to repeal an act for the better regulation of the mines and the government of foreign miners

  5. An act to provide for the protection of foreigners and to define their liabilities and privileges

  6. Unlike the previous foreign miners’ tax that all tax revenue must be surrendered to the state treasury of California

  7. It must be pointed out that the first legislation that was directly related to Chinese labors was a coolie bill, which was introduced by state senator George B. Tingley. The bill proposed to enforce the contract of labors in China, which would bring cheap labor to the USA for a certain length. The coolie bill was halted in amidst of anti-foreigner sentiments in the mining industry.

  8. An act to amend an act to provide for the protection of foreigners and to define their liabilities and privilege

  9. An act to discourage the immigration to this state of persons who cannot become citizens thereof

  10. An act to prevent the further immigration of Chinese or Mongolians to the state

  11. Approximate 1200 Chinese died at the Promontory junction in Utah (Tsai, 1986: 17).

  12. An act to prohibit the coolie trade

  13. See Lucibello (2014) for a general discussion of the Panic of 1873.

  14. The percentage of Chinese workers in the clothing industry is computed from the appendix V from Chiu (1967)

  15. There were six shoe factories in San Francisco in 1869. Workers in those factories were mostly affiliated with the Knight of St. Crispin (Cross 1935: 57). Shoemaking manufacturing was one of the occupations that faced intense competition from the national market.

  16. Most of the anti-coolie clubs of San Francisco and labor organizations were in the manufacturing sector.

  17. See Cross (1935: 81–82) for a list of state legislations in the 1870s. Most anti-Chinese proposals were struck down due to the concern of breaching the Burlingame Treaty, which would endanger the trade with China (e.g., see Cal State Senate Journal 1871, 438).

  18. See Assemblyman McMurray’s proposal for an example of such instruction in the beginning of the 1870s (California State Assembly Journal 1870: 101).

  19. An act to restrict the immigration of Chinese to the USA. The bill aimed to restrict the immigration of Chinese and abrogate the Burlingame Treaty by limiting the number of Chinese passengers to fifteen, which a ship may carry to the USA on any one voyage.

  20. Interestingly, Garfield was a supporter of Hayes’s veto on the restriction bill prior to the election (Hune 1982).

References

  • Arceo-Gomez EO, Campos-Vazquez RM. Double discrimination: is discrimination in job ads accompanied by discrimination in callbacks? J Econ Race Policy. 2019;2(4):257–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS. The economics of discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock HM. Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: Wiley; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich E. A theory of ethnic antagonism: the split labor market. Am Sociol Rev. 1972;37(5):547–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonacich E. Abolition, the extension of slavery, and the position of free blacks: a study of split labor markets in the United States, 1830-1863. Am J Sociol. 1975;81(3):601–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell TE. A split labor market analysis of discrimination against Chinese immigrants, 1850–1882. Am Sociol Rev. 1986;51(3):352–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown M, Philips P. Competition, racism, and hiring practices among California manufacturers, 1860-1882. Ind Labor Relat Rev. 1986;40(1):61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • California State Assembly Journal. 18th Session. California State Assembly Journal. Gelwicks, State Printer; 1870.

  • California State Assembly Statutes. 1st Session. California State Assembly Statutes. Winchester, State Printer; 1850.

  • California State Assembly Statutes. 2nd Session. California State Assembly Statutes. Eugene Casserly, State Printer; 1851.

  • California State Assembly Statutes. 3rd Session. California State Assembly Statutes. Fitch and Geiger, State Printer; 1852.

  • California State Assembly Statutes. 6th Session. California State Assembly Statutes. Redding, State Printer; 1855.

  • California State Assembly Statutes. 9th Session. California State Assembly Statutes. Omeara, State Printer; 1858.

  • California State Senate Journals. 3rd Session. Journal of the Senate. Fitch and Geiger, State Printer; 1852.

  • California State Senate Journals. 18th Session. Journal of the Senate. Springer, State Printer; 1871.

  • Chan S. A people of exceptional character: ethnic diversity, nativism, and racism in the California Gold Rush. In: Rooted in barbarous soil: people, culture, and community in Gold Rush California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2000. p. 44–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles KK, Guryan J. Prejudice and wages: an empirical assessment of Becker’s the economics of discrimination. J Polit Econ. 2008;116(5):773–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JJ. The impact of skill-based immigration restrictions: the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. J Hum Cap. 2015;9(3):298–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin GJ, Tu DK. Comprehensive immigration reform in the Jim Crow era: Chinese exclusion and the McCreary Act of 1893. Asian Am Law J. 2016;23:42–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn TW. A history of the Chinese in California: a syllabus. San Francisco: Chinese Historical Society of America; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu P. Chinese labor in California, 1850–1880: an economic study. Madison: State Historical Society of Wisconsin for the Dept. of History, University of Wisconsin; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR. American Shoemakers, 1648-1895: a sketch of industrial evolution. Q J Econ. 1909;24(1):39–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge MR. Chinese immigration. New York: H. Holt and Co.; 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross IB. A history of the labor movement in California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1935.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eaves L. A history of California labor legislation, with an introductory sketch of the San Francisco labor movement. Berkley: University of California Press; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily Alta California. Industrial Condition of the State. Daily Alta California; 1869.

  • Daily Alta California. The Tax on Foreign Miners and the Policy of Expulsion. Daily Alta California. 1852.

  • Davis WJ. History of political conventions in California, 1849–1892. Sacramento: California State Library; 1893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong E, Markham WT. Immigration, ethnicity, and conflict: the California Chinese, 1849–1882. Sociol Inq. 1991;61(4):471–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong E, Markham WT. Anti-Chinese politics in California in the 1870s: an intercounty analysis. Sociol Perspect. 2002;45(2):183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Ross A, Pavlik JB. Laissez-faire economic policy in a world where gender income gaps exist: helping or hurting. J Econ Race Policy. 2020;3(2):144–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter M. The political economy of ethnic change. Am J Sociol. 1974;79(5):1151–78.

  • Hilton M. The split labor market and chinese immigration, 1848-1882. J Ethn Migr. 1979;6(4):99–108.

  • Hune S. Politics of Chinese exclusion: legislative-executive conflict 1876–1882. Amerasia J. 1982;9(1):5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanazawa M. Immigration, exclusion, and taxation: anti-Chinese legislation in Gold Rush California. J Econ Hist. 2005;65(3):779–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal N. Blaming immigrants: nationalism and the economics of global movement. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus G. Chinese laborers and the construction of the Central Pacific. Utah Hist Q. 1969;37(1):41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger AO. The economics of discrimination. J Polit Econ. 1963;71(5):481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lew-Williams B. The Chinese must go: violence, exclusion, and the making of the alien in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucibello A. “Panic of 1873.” Essay. In Encyclopedia of American Recessions and Depressions 1, 1:227–46. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-Clio, LLC, 2014.

  • Mining and Scientific Press. “Editorial.” San Francisco, 12:4. 1860.

  • Morefield RH. The Mexican adaptation in American California: 1846–1875. San Francisco: R and E Research Associates; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nee V, de Bary Nee B. Longtime Californ’: a documentary study of an American Chinatown. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffer GA. Forbidden families: emigration experiences of Chinese women under the Page Law, 1875–1882. J Am Ethn Hist. 1986;6(1):28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson RH. The foreign miners’ tax of 1850 and Mexicans in California: exploitation or expulsion? Pac Hist. 1976;20:265–71.

  • Pincetl SS. Transforming California: a political history of land use and development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price PJ. A ‘Chinese Wall’ at the nation’s borders: Justice Stephen Field and the Chinese exclusion case. J Supreme Court Hist. 2018;43(1):7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmeyer EC. The anti-Chinese movement in California. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press; 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton A. The indispensable enemy: labor and the anti-Chinese movement in California. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1971.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seward GF. Chinese immigration in its social and economical aspects. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz JE. Approaches to the economics of discrimination. Am Econ Rev. 1973;63(2):287–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai S-s H. The Chinese experience in America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1986.

  • Wellborn M. The events leading to the Chinese exclusion acts. Annu Publ Hist Soc South Calif. 1912;9(1/2):49–58.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linan Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, L. The Political Economy of the Anti-Chinese Movement in California in the Nineteenth Century. J Econ Race Policy 5, 13–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00076-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41996-020-00076-9

Keywords

Navigation